On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 3:39 AM Joshua Watt wrote:
>
> Can we backport this to hardknott and dunfell (and gatesgarth if it's
> still active)?
Yes, will backport to dunfell!
Steve
> On 5/5/21 4:40 PM, Joshua Watt wrote:
> > Instead of having find directly invoke touch for each file in the root
>
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 08:39:27AM -0500, Joshua Watt wrote:
> Can we backport this to hardknott and dunfell (and gatesgarth if it's still
> active)?
Yes indeed, please to dunfell!
-Mikko, who also marked the patch but didn't have time to put it to test on
dunfell..
> On 5/5/21 4:40 PM, Joshua
Can we backport this to hardknott and dunfell (and gatesgarth if it's
still active)?
On 5/5/21 4:40 PM, Joshua Watt wrote:
Instead of having find directly invoke touch for each file in the root
file system, pass a list to xargs for batching. This significantly
reduces the number of times the to
Instead of having find directly invoke touch for each file in the root
file system, pass a list to xargs for batching. This significantly
reduces the number of times the touch program is invoked and speeds up
the do_image task time:
PKG TASK ABSDIFF RELDIFF CPUTIME1 -> CPUTIME