Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH] gnupg: added a coreutils runtime dependancy to gnupg recipe

2017-09-11 Thread yahia farghaly
e. so as a conclusion, i think it is not a problem of gnupg. On 11 September 2017 at 14:52, Alexander Kanavin < alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 09/09/2017 01:17 AM, Yahia Farghaly wrote: > >> From: yahiafarghaly >> >> When using 'apt-key add

Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH] gnupg: added a coreutils runtime dependancy to gnupg recipe

2017-09-09 Thread yahia farghaly
sorry if my question is naive, this is my first time working with yocto and the first patch i submit in an open source project ‌ On 9 September 2017 at 03:51, yahia farghaly wrote: > > Ok, this is a nice idea what i think is i may take only comm.c and its > depends then compiling it a

Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH] gnupg: added a coreutils runtime dependancy to gnupg recipe

2017-09-08 Thread yahia farghaly
, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Yahia Farghaly > wrote: > > From: yahiafarghaly > > > > When using 'apt-key add' on the target image, the gnupg is required > > but for gnupg to be fully functional, the coreutils is required to be > exist

[OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH] gnupg: added a coreutils runtime dependancy to gnupg recipe

2017-09-08 Thread Yahia Farghaly
From: yahiafarghaly When using 'apt-key add' on the target image, the gnupg is required but for gnupg to be fully functional, the coreutils is required to be exist with the gnupg. Otherwise, it may throw an error in runtime as one of components of coreutils is missing. For 'apt-key add', i face