Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2][v2] doxygen-native: add recipe

> Whilst this recipe works, I wonder if it would be more useful if it > were cross-compilable and used BBCLASSEXTEND to become native. Yes. I agree. it would be more useful. -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] Add api-doc class

>>It's not opt-in: once a recipe is using doxygen.bbclass then it has a build >>dependency on doxygen-native and *will* generate documentation. >>This is needless overhead if you don't intend to read the documentation. > > I think if you intend to read the documentation. Just inherit this class. I

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] Add api-doc class

>It's not opt-in: once a recipe is using doxygen.bbclass then it has a build >dependency on doxygen-native and *will* generate documentation. >This is needless overhead if you don't intend to read the documentation. I think if you intend to read the documentation. Just inherit this class. If not

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] doxygen: add recipe

>Also why are we adding it, what packages needs doxygen ? Please refer this site: http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/index.html -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/list

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] Add api-doc class

>>As this class is specific to doxygen, please call it doxygen.bbclass. [Zongchun] I agree and will change it in the next patch. >>Also I think this should be opt-in not forcibly enabled as not everyone would >>want API documentation to be generated. [Zongchun] Yes. it is opt-in. the source code o

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libtool: Add depends on binutils-cross

>OK is it cross, native or target recipe which has the problem ? >wouldnt it need to also depend on gcc-cross ? Only cross recipe has the problem. There is no need to gcc-cross. -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedde

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libtool: Add depends on binutils-cross

>can you explain the race a bit here. Sorry to confuse you. Sometimes libtool have been built but the binutils-cross have't been built yet. It is required by libtool. -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files:fix the command line wrap around issue

Yes. At least for my target, CONFIG_RESIZE isn't enabled that I'd expect to be required for this to work. for my target, CONFIG_RESIZE have been enabled, if we use resize in profile, we may meet the invalid character issue as I mentioned earlier. __

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files:fix the command line wrap around issue

发件人: otavio.salva...@gmail.com [mailto:otavio.salva...@gmail.com] 代表 Otavio Salvador 发送时间: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 11:15 AM 收件人: Zongchun YU 抄送: Burton, Ross; OE-core 主题: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files:fix the command line wrap around issue On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Zongchun YU

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files:fix the command line wrap around issue

Hello Ross. Do you have any other comments about this patch? Thank you! Best Regards Zongchun ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

[OE-core] 答复: [PATCH] base-files:fix the command line wrap around issue

Hello Ross. Thanks for your comments, I am sorry. the description is not clear. please see the below content: Sometimes we may use long commands. For example: Normal display: user@host:~cmd arg1 arg2 arg3 arg4 arg5argn-1 argn |