[OE-core] [Oe-Core][PATCH] perf: Fix to obey LD failure

2016-10-04 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith Haridasan This patch brings the last bit from meta-mentor for the perf to build successfully with minnowmax BSP. The meta-mentor commit for the same is: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-mentor/commit/meta-mentor-staging?id=a8db95c0d4081cf96915e0c3c4063a44f55e21cc The p

Re: [OE-core] [Oe-Core][PATCH] perf: Fix to obey LD failure

2016-10-04 Thread sujith h
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Christopher Larson wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Christopher Larson > wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Sujith H wrote: >> >>> From: Sujith Haridasan >>> >>> When built on

Re: [OE-core] [Oe-Core][PATCH] perf: Fix to obey LD failure

2016-10-04 Thread sujith h
ompile (log file is located at /home/sujith/MEL/dogwood/build-minnowmax/tmp/work/intel_corei7_64-mel-linux/perf/1.0-r9/temp/log.do_compile.29062) After applying the patch it built cleanly. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Sujith H wrote: > From: Sujith Haridasan > > When built on minnowmax

[OE-core] [Oe-Core][PATCH] perf: Fix to obey LD failure

2016-10-04 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith Haridasan When built on minnowmax ( machine name: intel-corei7-64), an error is noticed during the do_compile: /home/sujith/codebench-linux-install-2015.12-133-i686-pc-linux-gnu/codebench/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-ld: Relocatable linking with relocations from format elf64-x86-64 (/hom

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] perf: Fix to obey LD failure on qemux86-64

2016-09-26 Thread sujith h
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:40 AM, sujith h wrote: > Hi, > > Let me know if we need to make any changes to this patch. If so I would be > happy to do that. > Sorry for my earlier mail, this patch is merged: http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] x264: add textrel to INSANE_SKIP

2016-09-26 Thread sujith h
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:39 AM, sujith h wrote: > Hi, > > Let me know if this patch is ok. Else I can help make this patch better. > oops, sorry for my earlier mail. This patch is merged : http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=aa7f7b63485b8c4d33491b9cd467

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] perf: Fix to obey LD failure on qemux86-64

2016-09-25 Thread sujith h
Hi, Let me know if we need to make any changes to this patch. If so I would be happy to do that. Thanks, Sujith H On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Sujith H wrote: > From: Christopher Larson > > When built on an i686 host for qemux86-64 without the > fix to obey LD and it fails:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] x264: add textrel to INSANE_SKIP

2016-09-25 Thread sujith h
Hi, Let me know if this patch is ok. Else I can help make this patch better. Thanks, Sujith H On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Sujith H wrote: > From: Fahad Usman > > Tried by adding CFLAGS_append = " -fpic " to > the recipe. But that couldn't help resolve the

[OE-core] [PATCH] x264: add textrel to INSANE_SKIP

2016-09-21 Thread Sujith H
From: Fahad Usman Tried by adding CFLAGS_append = " -fpic " to the recipe. But that couldn't help resolve the warning message: x264/r2491+gitAUTOINC+c8a773ebfc-r0/packages-split/x264/usr/lib/libx264.so.144' has relocations in .text [textrel] It was found that this warning is emitted because of

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] x264: add textrel to INSANE_SKIP to skip the warning

2016-09-21 Thread sujith h
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 12:22 +0530, Sujith H wrote: > > From: Fahad Usman > > > > This change help fix the warning message: > > > > x264/r2491+gitAUTOINC+c8a773ebfc-r0/packages- > > split/x264/usr

[OE-core] [PATCH] perf: Fix to obey LD failure on qemux86-64

2016-09-20 Thread Sujith H
From: Christopher Larson When built on an i686 host for qemux86-64 without the fix to obey LD and it fails: /scratch/dogwood/toolchains/x86_64/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-ld: Relocatable linking with relocations from format elf64-x86-64 (/scratch/dogwood/perf-ld-test/build/tmp/work/qemux86_64-mel-linu

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] perf: Fix to obey LD failure on host i686

2016-09-20 Thread sujith h
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Christopher Larson > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:10 AM, sujith h wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Andre McCurdy > >> wrote

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] perf: Fix to obey LD failure on host i686

2016-09-19 Thread sujith h
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Sujith H wrote: > > From: Christopher Larson > > > > When built on an i686 host for qemux86-64 without the > > fix to obey LD and it fails: > > > > /scratch/dogwood/

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] x264: add textrel to INSANE_SKIP for cyclone5 machine

2016-09-15 Thread sujith h
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:15 PM, sujith h wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:13 AM, sujith h wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Burton, Ross >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 12 September 2016 at 07:13, Sujith H wrote:

[OE-core] [PATCH] x264: add textrel to INSANE_SKIP to skip the warning

2016-09-14 Thread Sujith H
From: Fahad Usman This change help fix the warning message: x264/r2491+gitAUTOINC+c8a773ebfc-r0/packages-split/x264/usr/lib/libx264.so.144' has relocations in .text [textrel] Adding textrel to INSANE_SKIP resolves this issue. This issue was observed in cyclone5 and imx6qsabresd BSP's. So gener

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] x264: add textrel to INSANE_SKIP for cyclone5 machine

2016-09-14 Thread sujith h
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:13 AM, sujith h wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Burton, Ross > wrote: > >> >> On 12 September 2016 at 07:13, Sujith H wrote: >> >>> +# PIC can't be enabled for 32-bit x86 and cyclone5 >>> INSANE_

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] x264: add textrel to INSANE_SKIP for cyclone5 machine

2016-09-14 Thread sujith h
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 12 September 2016 at 07:13, Sujith H wrote: > >> +# PIC can't be enabled for 32-bit x86 and cyclone5 >> INSANE_SKIP_${PN}_append_x86 = " textrel" >> +INSANE_SKIP_${PN}_append_cyclone5 = "

[OE-core] [PATCH] x264: add textrel to INSANE_SKIP for cyclone5 machine

2016-09-11 Thread Sujith H
From: Fahad Usman This change help fix the warning message: x264/r2491+gitAUTOINC+c8a773ebfc-r0/packages-split/x264/usr/lib/libx264.so.144' has relocations in .text [textrel] Adding textrel to INSANE_SKIP resolves this issue. Signed-off-by: Fahad Usman --- meta/recipes-multimedia/x264/x264_

[OE-core] [PATCH] perf: Fix to obey LD failure on qemux86-64

2016-09-08 Thread Sujith H
From: Christopher Larson When built on an i686 host for qemux86-64 without the fix to obey LD and it fails: /scratch/dogwood/toolchains/x86_64/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-ld: Relocatable linking with relocations from format elf64-x86-64 (/scratch/dogwood/perf-ld-test/build/tmp/work/qemux86_64-mel-linu

[OE-core] [PATCH] perf: Fix to obey LD failure on host i686

2016-09-07 Thread Sujith H
From: Christopher Larson When built on an i686 host for qemux86-64 without the fix to obey LD and it fails: /scratch/dogwood/toolchains/x86_64/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-ld: Relocatable linking with relocations from format elf64-x86-64 (/scratch/dogwood/perf-ld-test/build/tmp/work/qemux86_64-mel-linu

Re: [OE-core] [yocto] [PATCH] ruby: ensure that .ext/rdoc is gone in compile

2016-09-07 Thread sujith h
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Aug 29, 2016, at 5:45 AM, Sujith H wrote: > > > > From: Christopher Larson > > > > rdoc gets unhappy if this already exists, so remove it before building. > > > > Without this, it's pos

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] ruby: ensure that .ext/rdoc is gone in compile

2016-08-31 Thread sujith h
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Alexander Kanavin < alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 08/29/2016 03:47 PM, Sujith H wrote: > >> From: Christopher Larson >> >> rdoc gets unhappy if this already exists, so remove it before building. >> >> Wit

[OE-core] [PATCH] ruby: ensure that .ext/rdoc is gone in compile

2016-08-29 Thread Sujith H
From: Christopher Larson rdoc gets unhappy if this already exists, so remove it before building. Without this, it's possible to hit this error: Directory .ext/rdoc already exists, but it looks like it isn't an RDoc directory. Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson Signed-off-by: Sujith Har

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] webkitgtk: package debug files properly and move -g removal to staging

2016-04-22 Thread sujith h
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 22 April 2016 at 13:41, Sujith Haridasan wrote: > >> +FILES_${PN}-dbg += "${libdir}/webkit2gtk-4.0/injected-bundle/.debug \ >> +${libdir}/webkitgtk/webkit2gtk-4.0/.debug/*" >> > > Debug packages are collected automat

[OE-core] Fwd: [yocto][meta-qt5] How to increase depth of qemuarm from bootargs?

2016-04-15 Thread sujith h
-- Forwarded message -- From: sujith h Date: Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:53 PM Subject: [yocto][meta-qt5] How to increase depth of qemuarm from bootargs? To: "yo...@yoctoproject.org" Cc: noor_ah...@mentor.com Hi all, I am trying to build Qt5 from meta-qt5 ( master bra

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: Loading glx module

2015-01-06 Thread sujith h
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:41 PM, sujith h wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Burton, Ross > wrote: > >> >> On 6 January 2015 at 12:51, sujith h wrote: >> >>> saying: "could not initialize glx" . Hence I made a change in the recipe

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: Loading glx module

2015-01-06 Thread sujith h
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 6 January 2015 at 12:51, sujith h wrote: > >> saying: "could not initialize glx" . Hence I made a change in the recipe >> and added IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " xserver-xorg-extension-glx" and it

[OE-core] [PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: Loading glx module

2015-01-06 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H This module was required to get opengl working with Qt5 version 5.4 ( when tested with qemuarm and qemux86). After adding this change to the xorg.conf and restarting xserver qtquick and qtdeclarative examples of Qt5 started working appropriately. Signed-off-by: Sujith H Signed

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: Loading glx module

2015-01-06 Thread sujith h
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 6 January 2015 at 10:54, Sujith H wrote: > >> +if >> ${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES','x11','true','false',d)}; then >> > > Why would a X11-sp

[OE-core] [PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: Loading glx module

2015-01-06 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H This module was required to get opengl working with Qt5 version 5.4 ( when tested with qemuarm and qemux86). After adding this change to the xorg.conf and restarting xserver qtquick and qtdeclarative examples of Qt5 started working appropriately. Signed-off-by: Sujith H Signed

[OE-core] [PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: Loading glx module

2015-01-06 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H This module was required to get opengl working with Qt5 version 5.4 ( when tested with qemuarm and qemux86). After adding this change to the xorg.conf and restarting xserver qtquick and qtdeclarative examples of Qt5 started working appropriately. Signed-off-by: Sujith H Signed

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] pyparted: Add recipe

2014-08-12 Thread sujith h
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:34:20PM +0530, Sujith H wrote: > > From: Sujith H > > > > This recipe will provide a set of Python modules that > > provide Python programmers an interface to libparted, > >

[OE-core] [PATCH] pyparted: Add recipe

2014-08-12 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H This recipe will provide a set of Python modules that provide Python programmers an interface to libparted, the GNU parted library for disk partitioning and filesystem manipulation. Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson Signed-off-by: Sujith H --- meta/recipes-extended/pyparted

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] opkg-utils: allow disabling update-alternatives

2014-08-11 Thread sujith h
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 08/08/2014 02:37 AM, Sujith H wrote: > >> From: Sujith H >> >> This is needed to deal with the situation where we're using ipk >> packaging, so >> opkg-utils must be built regardless of what update-a

[OE-core] [PATCH] opkg-utils: allow disabling update-alternatives

2014-08-11 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H This is needed to deal with the situation where we're using ipk packaging, so opkg-utils must be built regardless of what update-alternatives provider we prefer. The downside to the current implementation is the need to adjust PACKAGECONFIG as well as PREFERRED_PROVIDER, but

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] psplash: Adding support for systemd service files

2014-08-11 Thread sujith h
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 08/08/2014 02:09 AM, Sujith H wrote: > >> From: Sujith H >> >> If the DISTRO_FEATURES has systemd, then its better >> to have corresponding service files associated with >> the psplash. This change will

[OE-core] [PATCH] opkg-utils: allow disabling update-alternatives

2014-08-08 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H This is needed to deal with the situation where we're using ipk packaging, so opkg-utils must be built regardless of what update-alternatives provider we prefer. The downside to the current implementation is the need to adjust PACKAGECONFIG as well as PREFERRED_PROVIDER, but

[OE-core] [PATCH] psplash: Adding support for systemd service files

2014-08-08 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H If the DISTRO_FEATURES has systemd, then its better to have corresponding service files associated with the psplash. This change will help to do the same. Signed-off-by: Muzaffar Mahmood Signed-off-by: Sujith H --- meta/recipes-core/psplash/files/psplash-quit.service | 11

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] opkg-utils: allow disabling update-alternatives

2014-08-07 Thread sujith h
Hi Paul Eggleton, On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Sujith H wrote: > From: Sujith H > > This is needed to deal with the situation where we're using ipk packaging, > so > opkg-utils must be built regardless of what update-alternatives provider we > prefer. The

[OE-core] [PATCH] opkg-utils: allow disabling update-alternatives

2014-08-07 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H This is needed to deal with the situation where we're using ipk packaging, so opkg-utils must be built regardless of what update-alternatives provider we prefer. The downside to the current implementation is the need to adjust PACKAGECONFIG as well as PREFERRED_PROVIDER, but

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] opkg-utils: allow disabling update-alternatives

2014-08-06 Thread sujith h
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wednesday 06 August 2014 17:34:09 Sujith H wrote: > > From: Sujith H > > > > This is needed to deal with the situation where we're using ipk > packaging, > > so opkg-utils must be built regardless of

[OE-core] [PATCH] opkg-utils: allow disabling update-alternatives

2014-08-06 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H This is needed to deal with the situation where we're using ipk packaging, so opkg-utils must be built regardless of what update-alternatives provider we prefer. The downside to the current implementation is the need to adjust PACKAGECONFIG as well as PREFERRED_PROVIDER, but

[OE-core] [PATCH] opkg-utils: allow disabling update-alternatives

2014-08-06 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H This is needed to deal with the situation where we're using ipk packaging, so opkg-utils must be built regardless of what update-alternatives provider we prefer. The downside to the current implementation is the need to adjust PACKAGECONFIG as well as PREFERRED_PROVIDER, but

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] systemd: Adding RRECOMMENDS for os-release

2014-08-06 Thread sujith h
Hi, This patch is in addition to the os-release patch I had posted earlier. Because systemd wants os-release file and uses it. On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Sujith H wrote: > From: Sujith H > > Systemd depends on the os-release hence adding > RRECOMMENDS for the sys

[OE-core] [PATCH] systemd: Adding RRECOMMENDS for os-release

2014-08-06 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H Systemd depends on the os-release hence adding RRECOMMENDS for the systemd package. Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson Signed-off-by: Sujith H --- meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_213.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image.bbclass: Adding loop back for machine name in hosts file

2014-08-05 Thread sujith h
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 4 aug. 2014, om 15:57 heeft Sujith H het volgende > geschreven: > > > From: Sujith H > > > > If hostname is not added to /etc/hosts file then rpcinfo > > command fails when hostname is passed as

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image.bbclass: Adding loop back for machine name in hosts file

2014-08-04 Thread sujith h
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Enrico Scholz < enrico.sch...@sigma-chemnitz.de> wrote: > Sujith H writes: > > > If hostname is not added to /etc/hosts file then rpcinfo command fails > > when hostname is passed as argument. > > ... > > root@mx6q:~# rpcinf

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image.bbclass: Adding loop back for machine name in hosts file

2014-08-04 Thread sujith h
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Monday 04 August 2014 20:03:09 sujith h wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Paul Eggleton < > paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com > > > wrote: > > > > > &

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image.bbclass: Adding loop back for machine name in hosts file

2014-08-04 Thread sujith h
Hi Paul, On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi Sujith, > > On Monday 04 August 2014 19:27:08 Sujith H wrote: > > From: Sujith H > > > > If hostname is not added to /etc/hosts file then rpcinfo > > command fails when hostname is passed a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image.bbclass: Adding loop back for machine name in hosts file

2014-08-04 Thread sujith h
Hi, Let me know if any more changes have to be made to make this patch look better. On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Sujith H wrote: > From: Sujith H > > If hostname is not added to /etc/hosts file then rpcinfo > command fails when hostname is passed as argument. This was >

[OE-core] [PATCH] image.bbclass: Adding loop back for machine name in hosts file

2014-08-04 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H If hostname is not added to /etc/hosts file then rpcinfo command fails when hostname is passed as argument. This was observed when rpcinfo command was tested on freescale target. Below was the output observed without this change. root@mx6q:~# rpcinfo -s mx6q rpcinfo: can&#

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] netbase: Adding loop back for machine name in hosts file

2014-08-04 Thread sujith h
Kindly ignore the above patch. It was sent by mistake :( Sorry for trouble. On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Sujith H wrote: > From: Sujith H > > If hostname is not added to /etc/hosts file then rpcinfo > command fails when hostname is passed as argument. This was > observ

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] netbase: Adding loop back for machine name in hosts file

2014-08-04 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H If hostname is not added to /etc/hosts file then rpcinfo command fails when hostname is passed as argument. This was observed when rpcinfo command was tested on freescale target. Below was the output observed without this change. root@mx6q:~# rpcinfo -s mx6q rpcinfo: can&#

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] netbase: Adding loop back for machine name in hosts file

2014-08-04 Thread sujith h
gt; forbidden ('_') or have special meanings in DNS. > > > Enrico > > Footnotes: > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648725 > -- > _______ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.opene

[OE-core] [PATCH] os-release: Adding a new recipe for operating system identification

2014-08-01 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H The /etc/os-release will have the operating system identification data. Tested on target with systemd enabled. Here is the sample file looks in the file: ID=poky-ivi-systemd NAME=Yocto GENIVI Baseline (Poky/meta-ivi) VERSION=6.0+snapshot-20140721 (daisy) VERSION_ID=6.0+snapshot

[OE-core] [PATCH] netbase: Adding loop back for machine name in hosts file

2014-07-31 Thread Sujith H
From: Sujith H If hostname is not added to /etc/hosts file then rpcinfo command fails when hostname is passed as argument. This was observed when rpcinfo command was tested on freescale target. Below was the output observed without this change. root@mx6q:~# rpcinfo -s mx6q rpcinfo: can&#

[OE-core] [meta-qt5] Warnings while building Qt recipes

2014-05-21 Thread sujith h
r_out('libdir', WARN_QA, d)}" May I know a better option to resolve this warnings? Thanks, Sujith H -- സുജിത് ഹരിദാസന് Bangalore Contributor to KDE project http://fci.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-DRM-Campaign http://sujithh.info -- ___ Openembedd

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] nspr: Add LDFLAGS to TARGET_CC_ARCH to fix warning

2013-10-16 Thread sujith h
Hi, I hope the patch and the waning messages it addresses are ok. Else let me know, I will fix them. Thanks, Sujith H On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Sujith H wrote: > WARNING: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary: > 'armv7a-vfp-neon-mel-linux-gnueabi/nspr/4.10-r0/packages

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Fixing the warning

2013-10-15 Thread sujith h
Hi Sau On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 10/08/2013 09:25 PM, Sujith H wrote: > >> Warning: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary >> >> > The short commit message needs to be in the format similar to > nspr: Add LDFLAGS to TARGET_CC_ARCH to fix Wa

[OE-core] [PATCH] nspr: Add LDFLAGS to TARGET_CC_ARCH to fix warning

2013-10-15 Thread Sujith H
/lib/nspr/tests/threads' WARNING: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary: 'armv7a-vfp-neon-mel-linux-gnueabi/nspr/4.10-r0/packages-split/nspr-dev/usr/lib/nspr/tests/semaerr' There are many QA Warnings thrown like the above for this recipe. This is observed for target imx6 sabre

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Fixing the warning

2013-10-08 Thread sujith h
better. Thanks, Sujith H On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sujith H wrote: > Warning: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary > > Signed-off-by: Sujith H > --- > meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.10.bb | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git > a/meta/recipes

[OE-core] [PATCH] Fixing the warning

2013-10-08 Thread Sujith H
Warning: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary Signed-off-by: Sujith H --- meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.10.bb | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.10.bb b/meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.10.bb index fcecb95..4247fd0 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-support