Re: [OE-core] [[PATCH v3]] populate_sdk_base.bbclass: Make it possible to override the create_shar method of populate_sdk_base.

2012-10-15 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 10/08/12 12:43, Martin Ertsaas wrote: > From: Thomas Kristensen > > If you wish to change the install/unpack method of the sdk, this can now be > done by making > your own create_shar method, and setting a SDK_PACKAGING_FUNC variable to your > new create_shar function. > > Signed-off-by: Thoma

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] populate_sdk_base.bbclass: Make it possible to overrise the create_shar method of populate_sdk_base.

2012-10-07 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 10/03/12 14:51, Martin Ertsaas wrote: > From: Thomas Kristensen > > If you wish to change the install/unpack method of the sdk, this can now be > done by making > your own create_shar method, and setting a POPULATE_SDK_CREATE_SHAR_COMMAND > variable to your > new create_shar function. > > Sig

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk, image: Add debug capture support

2012-10-02 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 10/02/12 15:59, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote: >> On 10/02/12 15:53, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 10:42 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: &

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk, image: Add debug capture support

2012-10-02 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 10/02/12 15:53, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: >> On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 10:42 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> Or IMAGE_FEATURES += "dbg-img" ;-) >> Where is that implemented? I couldn't find any obvious reference to >> dbg-img in any classes. >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] bash: Make it possible to run bash 3.2.48 instead of 4.2.

2012-09-23 Thread Martin Ertsås
What is the status of this patch? Are there more changes needed for this to make it in master, or are we just waiting until after 1.3? - Martin On 09/20/12 08:48, Saul Wold wrote: > On 09/19/2012 11:05 PM, Martin Ertsås wrote: >> On 09/19/12 17:02, Saul Wold wrote: >>> On 0

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] bash: Make it possible to run bash 3.2.48 instead of 4.2.

2012-09-20 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 09/20/12 08:48, Saul Wold wrote: > On 09/19/2012 11:05 PM, Martin Ertsås wrote: >> On 09/19/12 17:02, Saul Wold wrote: >>> On 09/19/2012 12:16 AM, Martin Ertsaas wrote: >>>> bash-3.2.48 did not provide the linking from sh to bash, making it >>>> unusabl

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] bash: Make it possible to run bash 3.2.48 instead of 4.2.

2012-09-19 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 09/19/12 17:02, Saul Wold wrote: > On 09/19/2012 12:16 AM, Martin Ertsaas wrote: >> bash-3.2.48 did not provide the linking from sh to bash, making it >> unusable. >> Moving the license part out of the bash.inc file, and into >> bash_4.2.bb file makes >> us able to use that file also for bash_3.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] bash: Make it possible to run bash 3.2.48 instead of 4.2.

2012-09-18 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 09/18/12 16:55, Saul Wold wrote: > On 09/18/2012 05:52 AM, Martin Ertsaas wrote: >> bash-3.2.48 did not provide the linking from sh to bash, making it >> unusable. >> This patch fixes this. The reason for using 3.2.48 is that it is >> GPLv2 licensed, >> which 4.2 is not. >> --- >> meta/recipes

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] bash: Make bash_3.2.48 a nativesdk package.

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 09/11/12 10:29, Martin Ertsaas wrote: > 3.2.48 is the bash package in oe-core which is not GPLv3. Making that a > nativesdk > package makes sure we have the same bash version in our toolchain as in our > image. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Ertsaas > --- > meta/recipes-extended/bash/bash_3.2.48.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] perl: Remove the changes of bin, lib etc. as the defaults will give sane values.

2012-09-09 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 09/06/12 21:43, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 9/6/12 2:11 PM, Saul Wold wrote: >> On 09/06/2012 01:29 AM, Martin Ertsaas wrote: >>> The old config put stuff in >>> ${perldir}/image/usr/local/oecore-x86_64/sysroot/x86_64-unknownsdk-linux/usr/local/oecore-x86_64/sysroots/x86_64-unknownsdk-linux/usr >>> i

Re: [OE-core] Tackling compilation errors in qt5 recipe.

2012-08-23 Thread Martin Ertsås
Hi. You could have a look at g...@github.com:martiert/meta-qt5.git as a starting point. Have not tried anything but the qt5-x11-free packages, which makes what is needed for rendering, but it is at least a starting point. - Martin On 08/23/12 19:59, Sravan wrote: > Hello, > > I never worked on o

Re: [OE-core] meta-qt5 available

2012-07-26 Thread Martin Ertsås
will break on non-armv7a chips. - Martin On 07/26/12 16:08, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 26-07-12 16:02, Martin Ertsås schreef: > > Hi. > > > I have just made a new layer, for qt5 recipes. This contains work in > > progress recipes, but should be working. In the (not so) long run, q

[OE-core] meta-qt5 available

2012-07-26 Thread Martin Ertsås
Hi. I have just made a new layer, for qt5 recipes. This contains work in progress recipes, but should be working. In the (not so) long run, qt5 recipes will hopefully be added to oe-core, but in the meantime these are available. The recipes are based on the qt4 recipes in oe-core from 4-5 months

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Changed SRC_URI for eglibc repo.

2012-07-19 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 07/19/12 13:41, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:34 +0200, Martin Ertsås wrote: >> On 07/19/12 13:35, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:15:17PM +0200, Martin Ertsaas wrote: >>>> The branches repo for eglibc is /branches, not /

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Changed SRC_URI for eglibc repo.

2012-07-19 Thread Martin Ertsås
On 07/19/12 13:35, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:15:17PM +0200, Martin Ertsaas wrote: >> The branches repo for eglibc is /branches, not /svn/branches. > Are you sure? wasn't this tested on broken bitbake where protocol param > was ignored and default svn:// protocol was used inst