On 07/12/2017 06:03 AM, Burton, Ross
wrote:
On 11 July 2017 at 16:57, Lev
Iserovich <lev.iserov...@deshawresearch.com>
wrote:
Libasprintf
was included in gettex
On 07/11/2017 11:35 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
Your patch is simply corrupted - please use git to send it, not a regular MUA.
Thank you, resending with git worked.
Lev
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
From: Lev Iserovich
Libasprintf was included in gettext 0.16 recipe, but omitted for some reason
in 0.19. This turns it back on.
Signed-off-by: Lev Iserovich
---
meta/recipes-core/gettext/gettext_0.19.8.1.bb | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes
Can anyone help me with undestanding this - I'm confused by this
patchwork failure.
The patch applies just fine on top of master - my patch was based on top
of the commit with the hash referenced by patchwork below.
Thanks,
Lev Iserovich
On 07/10/2017 05:31 PM, Patchwork wrote:
== S
Libasprintf was included in gettext 0.16 recipe, but omitted for some reason
in 0.19. This turns it back on.
Signed-off-by: Lev Iserovich
---
meta/recipes-core/gettext/gettext_0.19.8.1.bb | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/gettext
