Re: [OE-core] [RFC] uboot-sign: Fix u-boot dtb signatures

CC everyone from the original bug report Am Donnerstag, dem 20.02.2025 um 15:40 +0100 schrieb Leonard Anderweit via lists.openembedded.org: > With UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE enabled commit 3fb215a3af24 (u-boot: > kernel-fitimage: Fix dependency loop if UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE and > UBOOT_ENV > ena

Re: [OE-core] Broken FIT image signing since "u-boot: kernel-fitimage: Fix dependency loop if UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE and UBOOT_ENV enabled"

Hi, I've also noticed this bug and sent patch [1] to fix it. [1] https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/211761 Leonard Am Donnerstag, dem 20.02.2025 um 10:46 + schrieb Jose Quaresma via lists.openembedded.org: > Hi, > > Any news about this regression? > If we don't get

[OE-core] [RFC] uboot-sign: Fix u-boot dtb signatures

With UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE enabled commit 3fb215a3af24 (u-boot: kernel-fitimage: Fix dependency loop if UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE and UBOOT_ENV enabled) always adds the signature of UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME to the u-boot dtb, independent of FIT_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL. The kernel fitimage configuration node is signed wi

[OE-core] [scarthgap] uboot-config: fix devtool modify with kernel-fitimage

From: Adrian Freihofer How to reproduce: - UBOOT_CONFIG must be used. With UBOOT_MACHINE it works fine. A simple example based on oe-core is to modify the beaglebone-yocto.conf file like this: -UBOOT_MACHINE = "am335x_evm_defconfig" +UBOOT_CONFIG = "foo" +UBOOT_CONFIG[foo] = "am335x_evm