Hi,
> This is the patch that disables the sporadically failing stuff:
> [
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools/0001-tests-regression-disable-the-tools-live-tests.patch
> |
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-ker
Hi,
Upstream here.
Always happy to give input as long as we are put in the loop.
Also bugs/sporadic test failure can be reported on our mailing list [1] and bug
tracker[2].
[1] https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
[2] https://bugs.lttng.org/
We understand that the burden
eta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools_2.12.2.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools_2.12.2.bb
> @@ -162,3 +162,6 @@ do_install_ptest () {
> esac
> done
> }
> +
> +COMPATIBLE_HOST_riscv64 = "null"
> +
> --
> 2.28.0
>
>
--
Jon
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 07:22:03AM +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 10:25 -0400, Jonathan Rajotte-Julien wrote:
> > Is this something upstream (lttng-dev mailing list) should be
> > interested in?
>
> Its a tough one as the man page is technically correct
ts-do-not-run-test-applications-from-.libs.patch \
> +file://0001-fs.c-initialize-other_entry.patch \
> "
> SRCREV = "06df58f89ee51b1a2c6a2c187ec3f15691633910"
> UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX = "v(?P2(\.\d+)+)$"
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
>
01-tests-do-not-run-test-applications-from-.libs.patch \
> + file://0001-Make-manpages-multilib-identical.patch \
> "
> SRCREV = "06df58f89ee51b1a2c6a2c187ec3f15691633910"
> UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX = "v(?P2(\.\d+)+)$"
> --
> 2.13.3
>
> --
> __
"Li Zhou"
> To: "Jonathan Rajotte-Julien"
> Cc: "openembedded-core"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 3:41:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] lttng-modules: Check the pid_ns before using
> it because it may be NULL
> On 2/20/20 10:47 PM, Jon
Hi,
Can we get more info on the kernel version and config?
Did you submit this on our mailing list?(lttng-dev). If not I would highly
recommend that you do so in the future so we can eliminate *custom* patches and
get to the bottom of the issue at hand so that the whole community benefit from
I forwarded it to lttng-modules maintainer. I'll get back to you as soon as I
get feedback.
- Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 10:26 +0800, Li Zhou wrote:
> > Check the pid_ns before using it because it may be NULL to fix below
> > issue:
> > <1>[ 22.637196] Unable to handle ker
as babeltrace. If it will be known as
> babeltrace2 always, we probably change PN.
Babeltrace 2 executable will be forever named babeltrace2.
Hope this clear up this part a bit.
--
Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
EfficiOS
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:06:12AM +0100, Anders Wallin wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I think it's better to use babeltrace2 since it's a new version of
> babeltrace.
> The dist packages uses babeltrace2 and the main application/program is
> called babeltrace2.
>
> Jonatan; Do you have any comment on the
> +
> > > +S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> > > +
> > > +inherit autotools pkgconfig
> > > +
> > > +EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-debug-info"
> > > +
> > > +ASNEEDED = ""
> > >
> >
> > Looks like thi
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 03:19:08PM +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> Upstream is aware, and will investigate and fix.
For reference: https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/1217
Acked-by: Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
> ---
> ...ression-disable
ing on it.
These tests have a lot of moving parts.
Cheers
>
> Alex
>
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 18:37, Jonathan Rajotte-Julien <
> jonathan.rajotte-jul...@efficios.com> wrote:
>
> > Could you point me toward reports for the failing tests?
> >
> > I just
gt; -lttng-tools-ptest \
> openssh-ptest \
> openssl-ptest \
> perl-ptest \
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> --
> ___
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listi
PN}-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
> file://Makefile-Do-not-fail-if-CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS-is-not-en.patch
> \
> file://BUILD_RUNTIME_BUG_ON-vs-gcc7.patch \
> +
> file://0001-Fix-SUNRPC-Fix-oops-when-trace-sunrpc_task-events-in.patch \
> "
>
> SRC_URI[md5sum] = "c618fb646514dfc1bf910cfd7cda4256"
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> --
> ___
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
EfficiOS
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Hi,
This patch breaks the API of stable-1.5. It is clearly mentioned in the commit
message:
It introduces API-breaking changes in the C and Python APIs, since we
need to be able to return negative time values, which were previously
used as errors (-1ULL).
You can have it in your layer but it
gt; >
> >
> >
> > --
> > - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
> > thee at its end
> > - "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II
>
>
>
> --
> - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer
Remove upstreamed patches.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
...nk-libpause_consumer-on-liblttng-ctl.patch | 35 --
...01-Skip-when-testapp-is-not-present.patch} | 0
...tng-modules-presence-before-testing.patch} | 0
...st_getcpu_override-on-single-thread-.patch | 52 ---
...e-tree
examples-disable.patch \
> -
> file://0001-compat-work-around-broken-_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF-on-MU.patch \
> "
>
> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "ffcfa8c1ba9a52f002d240e936e9afa2"
> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> "9e8420f90d5f963f7aa32bc6d44adc1e491136f687c69f
am = "${AUTOREV}"
> +PV_class-devupstream = "2.11.0-rc+git${SRCPV}"
This should be 2.10.
--
Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
EfficiOS
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:52:36AM -0400, Jonathan Rajotte-Julien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Please don't base distributions on -rc tags. They are not meant for this.
> > >
> > > We always integrate support for newer kernel versions instrumentation back
> > &
7
v5.0.21
v5.1.9
v5.2-rc4
[4] https://ci.lttng.org/view/LTTng-modules/
--
Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
EfficiOS
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
.../liburcu/{liburcu_0.11.0.bb => liburcu_0.11.1.bb} | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-support/liburcu/{liburcu_0.11.0.bb => liburcu_0.11.1.bb}
(83%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/liburcu/liburcu_0.11.0
Hi,
> I think Jonathan Rajotte might be able to help us with lttng-tools.
Finally had some time for this.
See [1][2].
[2] does bring the matter of forcing lttng-ust support of lttng-tools when ptest
is deployed. "lttng-ust" is already set in PACKAGECONFIG by default but is
the
The lttng-tools project is essentially a "tracer" controller, the tests
depends heavily on lttng-ust and lttng-modules presence.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools_2.10.6.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/me
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
...ttng-modules-presence-before-testing.patch | 26 +++
.../lttng/lttng-tools_2.10.6.bb | 1 +
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools/0008-Fix-check-for-lttng-modules-presence
Clearly the actual patch is missing, sending v2 shortly.
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:06:44PM +, Jonathan Rajotte wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
> ---
> meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools_2.10.6.bb | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/m
The lttng-tools project is essentially a "tracer" controller, the tests
depends heavily on lttng-ust and lttng-modules presence.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools_2.10.6.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/me
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools_2.10.6.bb | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools_2.10.6.bb
b/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools_2.10.6.bb
index a3fabb20ec..f1bb7224f3 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel
nd = " ptest"
That said, I should be able to take a look at the problem related to
lttng-tools.
Thanks
--
Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
EfficiOS
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Drop backported patch.
Update paths to files that establish the licensing.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
...-support-for-the-RISC-V-architecture.patch | 157 --
.../{liburcu_0.10.2.bb => liburcu_0.11.0.bb} | 10 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 163 deleti
On Apr 17, 2019 5:56 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:I mentioned differences in numbers of pass/fail depending on whichimage you install ptests into. The recipes which have the issues andthe numbers are:core-image-sato with ptest installed:Recipe | Passed | Failed | Skipped
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
.../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-tools-profile.bb | 1 -
meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-common.inc | 1 -
meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools_2.10.6.bb | 1 -
3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
.../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-tools-profile.bb | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-tools-profile.bb
b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-tools-profile.bb
index
musl. This is a legit
bug. The fixes or a variant should be accepted soon.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
...nk-libpause_consumer-on-liblttng-ctl.patch | 35 +
...st_getcpu_override-on-single-thread-.patch | 52 ++
...e-tree-origin-can-be-a-symlink-itsel.patch | 80 +++
...004-Skip-when
musl implementation for _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF is a bit fishy.
[1] https://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2019/03/15/5
Anyway, we implemented a fallback.
This patch should be gone by next recipe update.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
...nd-broken-_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF-on-MU.patch | 109
Hi Khem,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 01:11:19PM -0400, Jonathan Rajotte-Julien wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 09:58:03AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
> > ---
> > meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-common.inc | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
t;"
>
> BABELTRACE = "babeltrace"
>
> --
> 2.21.0
>
> --
> ___
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
EfficiOS
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
""
> LTTNGUST_libc-musl = ""
> --
> 2.21.0
>
> --
> ___
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
c = "lttng-ust"
> -PACKAGECONFIG_remove_riscv64 = "lttng-ust"
>
> SRC_URI = "https://lttng.org/files/lttng-tools/lttng-tools-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
> file://x32.patch \
> --
> 2.21.0
>
> --
> ___
> Op
be the person to ask about
> this as our musl expert...
Do you have a link to said discussion? I ended up debugging using print
statement since even on Alpine gdb is "broken" (not working as expected).
I'm not sure how much time I can use on this. Will let you know if any progr
I find.
Side note, gdb simply segfault (at start) for me on a core-image-minirmnal
build using musl.
How would someone open the corefile generated on the build system with the
proper libs and all?
Thanks!
--
Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
EfficiOS
--
__
https://semver.org/
>
> Can you confirm this is bug fix only update?
>
Yes it is.
Cheers
--
Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
EfficiOS
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2019-March/280112.html
Cheers
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 04:08:42PM -0700, akuster808 wrote:
>
>
> On 3/13/19 1:53 PM, Jonathan Rajotte wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
>
> please provide more info on the u
Hi,
Disregard this series. It does not follow the project guideline regarding recipe
update for stable release.
Thanks
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 08:55:53PM +, Jonathan Rajotte wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
> ---
> .../lttng/{lttng-ust_2.10.1.bb => lttng-ust_2.10.3.bb
Hi,
Disregard this patch. It does not follow the project guideline regarding recipe
update for stable release.
Thanks,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 09:30:08PM +, Jonathan Rajotte wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
> ---
> .../lttng/{babeltrace_1.5.4.bb => babeltrace_1.5.6.bb
in
updating.
I guess the yocto/bitbake way to ensure our user get the latest stablest is to
provide a meta-lttng layers and instruct them to use it.
Again sorry for the noise.
Cheers
>
> Ross
>
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 20:54, Jonathan Rajotte
> wrote:
> >
> > Sign
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
.../lttng/{babeltrace_1.5.4.bb => babeltrace_1.5.6.bb}| 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/{babeltrace_1.5.4.bb => babeltrace_1.5.6.bb}
(82%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel
Update 0001-Allow-multiple-attempts-to-connect-to-relayd.patch chunk
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
...multiple-attempts-to-connect-to-relayd.patch | 17 -
...tng-tools_2.9.5.bb => lttng-tools_2.9.11.bb} | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+),
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
.../lttng/{lttng-ust_2.10.1.bb => lttng-ust_2.10.3.bb}| 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/{lttng-ust_2.10.1.bb => lttng-ust_2.10.3.bb}
(90%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng
Drop patch [1] since it is part of the 2.10.9 release.
[1]
lttng-modules/0001-Fix-net-expose-sk-wmem-in-sock_exceed_buf_limit-trac.patch
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
...k-wmem-in-sock_exceed_buf_limit-trac.patch | 67 ---
...ules_2.10.7.bb => lttng-modules_2.10.9
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
.../lttng/{lttng-tools_2.9.5.bb => lttng-tools_2.9.11.bb} | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/{lttng-tools_2.9.5.bb =>
lttng-tools_2.9.11.bb} (97%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng
Pertinent fix for OE-Core since 2.10.6:
Fix: out of memory error handling
Fix: access migrate_disable field directly
Prevent allocation of buffers if exceeding available memory
2.10.9 also contains the necessary fix to support kernel up to 5.0.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
.../lttng/{lttng-ust_2.10.1.bb => lttng-ust_2.10.3.bb}| 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/{lttng-ust_2.10.1.bb => lttng-ust_2.10.3.bb}
(90%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng
:54550aa42378ce4b215bccbfd95e5e650b0d2efa)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
---
As a remainder, these glibc patches led to deadlock for the lttng-ust
python agent.
For a base test, I builded a core-image-sato and played around a bit in it.
Cheer
---
...set
: 54550aa42378ce4b215bccbfd95e5e650b0d2efa)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
---
As a remainder, these glibc patches led to deadlock for the lttng-ust
python agent.
For a base test, I builded a core-image-sato, played around a bit in it.
Cheer.
---
...set-dl_load_write_lock
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
.../lttng/lttng-tools_2.10.6.bb | 21 ++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools_2.10.6.bb
b/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools_2.10.6.bb
index 3324959cc3
Enable users to use lttng as an event sink for python3.
For more details: https://lttng.org/docs/v2.10/#doc-python-application
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-ust_2.10.3.bb | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta
to ensure that events generated
finish in the same buffer. Depend on util-linux.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rajotte
---
I also submitted the following patches [1] [2] to lttng upstream. It
should help get the ptest sucess ratio up when they are merged. They
should be released in the upcoming month.
[1
Hi Bruce,
We just release LTTng-modules 2.10.9 that should remove the need for most if not
all of this patches. Could you try it out?
Cheers
--
Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
EfficiOS
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core
_2.26.bb
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ SRC_URI = "${GLIBC_GIT_URI};branch=${SRCBRANCH};name=glibc \
>
> file://0024-elf-dl-deps.c-Make-_dl_build_local_scope-breadth-fir.patch \
> file://0025-locale-fix-hard-coded-reference-to-gcc-E.patch \
>
> file://0026-assert-Suppress-pedantic-warning-caused-by-statement.patch \
> + file://0027-glibc-reset-dl-load-write-lock-after-forking.patch \
> + file://0028-Bug-4578-add-ld.so-lock-while-fork.patch \
> "
>
> NATIVESDKFIXES ?= ""
--
Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
EfficiOS
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Hi,
Reposting to mailing list since I was not allowed without a subscription.
Both Alexander Kanavin (Babeltrace recipe maintainer) and Richard Purdie
were CC on the initial message.
Original Message
--
Hi,
The following commit [1] is present since Jethro but the issue is also
present in F
63 matches
Mail list logo
