Re: [OE-core] what is meaning of "SRC_URI_append_whatever +=" ??

2012-03-21 Thread Graeme Gregory
On 21/03/2012 10:46, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 21 mrt. 2012, om 11:28 heeft Robert P. J. Day het volgende geschreven: > >> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> >>> still perusing the very basics of oe-core and grepping madly, came >>> across the following oddity: >>> >>> $ grep -r SRC_URI_a

Re: [OE-core] [RFC oe-core] mkcard: Add a script to parition and format an SD Card

2011-08-30 Thread Graeme Gregory
On 30/08/2011 11:34, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 30 aug. 2011, om 11:36 heeft Graeme Gregory het volgende geschreven: > >> On 30/08/2011 10:31, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 17:03 -0400, Jason Kridner wrote: >>>>>>> This script is BSP specif

Re: [OE-core] [RFC oe-core] mkcard: Add a script to parition and format an SD Card

2011-08-30 Thread Graeme Gregory
On 30/08/2011 10:31, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 17:03 -0400, Jason Kridner wrote: > This script is BSP specific and shouldn't live in the OE-core layer. The only issue is this script is used from within the IMAGE_CMD_sdimg code which lives in OE-core (meta/classes/i

Re: [OE-core] [PROPOSAL] Package feature switches, redux.

2011-07-04 Thread Graeme Gregory
On 07/04/2011 05:12 PM, Chris Elston wrote: >> Hi, with my Angstrom cap on I like this syntax and I think it will be >> really useful. >> >> A second level concern I have is about conflicting features, its not >> something we will come across probably in DISTRO land as we are sensible >> enough not

Re: [OE-core] [PROPOSAL] Package feature switches, redux.

2011-07-04 Thread Graeme Gregory
On 07/04/2011 12:54 PM, Chris Elston wrote: > Since responses to my previous mail were generally positive, I've > reworked the package feature switches so that the interface is as RP > suggested. > > In the recipe for foo you would have a set of features defined like > this: > > PACKAGE_CONFIG[bar]

Re: [OE-core] Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh)

2011-07-03 Thread Graeme Gregory
On 07/03/2011 01:26 PM, Philip Balister wrote: > On 06/29/2011 09:56 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> That's already the case now. The problem is the PROVIDES overlap >> since the Poky people decided a distro could only have one true ssh >> implementation instead of choosing it per image. So if your dist

Re: [OE-core] Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh)

2011-06-29 Thread Graeme Gregory
On 06/29/2011 09:50 AM, Anders Darander wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:24, Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 29 jun 2011, om 00:41 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: >>> If they are independent then may be the openssh recipe should be >>> divided into openssh-ssh and openssh-rest so one can use ope

Re: [OE-core] Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh)

2011-06-28 Thread Graeme Gregory
On 06/29/2011 12:50 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Jun 28, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Scott Garman wrote: > >> On 06/28/2011 03:41 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> ERROR: Multiple .bb files are due to be built which each provide ssh >>> (/home/kraj/work/angstrom/sources/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/drop

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] package.bbclass: convert unpackaged file message from 'info' to 'warn' so that it shows up on the console

2011-05-09 Thread Graeme Gregory
On 09/05/2011 08:11, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 8 mei 2011, om 08:23 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: On 5/7/2011 9:50 AM, Darren Hart wrote: According to my discussion with RP, bb.note() is supposed to appear on the console. If it doesn't, that is a bug in bitbake, not the recipe it does if

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 28/33] python-pycairo: fix installation path of __init__.py

2011-04-22 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:27:31AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Koen Kooi > wrote: > > > > Op 22 apr 2011, om 19:16 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: > > > >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > >>> From: Nitin A Kamble > >>> > >>> This fixes

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] meta-handheld

2011-04-21 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 05:04:37PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi all, > > I've discussed the possibility with a few people on IRC of creating a meta- > handheld layer for support of older handheld devices - this would include > Zaurus, iPAQ, SimPad, etc; possibly even EZX phones if they aren't

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 00/13] Pull request #8

2011-04-18 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 01:07:01PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 18-04-11 12:44, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > Not an issue with this checkin, but it raises a question for me, > > > > Should xorg stuff be in OE core?

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] recipes-efl inside meta-oe or meta-efl next to meta-oe?

2011-03-24 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 07:49:27AM +, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:27:28AM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > Have either of you ever tried to explain some of the concepts we're > > dealing with to people who aren't deeply engaged engineers? >

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] recipes-efl inside meta-oe or meta-efl next to meta-oe?

2011-03-24 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:27:28AM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > Have either of you ever tried to explain some of the concepts we're > dealing with to people who aren't deeply engaged engineers? > Yes, everytime I apply for a new job/contract getting quite used to explaining it. > Having a model

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] recipes-efl inside meta-oe or meta-efl next to meta-oe?

2011-03-23 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:02:17PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 17:52 +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:03:04PM +, Joshua Lock wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 15:40 +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > > > On W

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] recipes-efl inside meta-oe or meta-efl next to meta-oe?

2011-03-23 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:03:04PM +, Joshua Lock wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 15:40 +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 08:19:31AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Koen Kooi > > > wrote: > > > > Hi,

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] recipes-efl inside meta-oe or meta-efl next to meta-oe?

2011-03-23 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 08:19:31AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to import the EFL recipes Martin did from meta-shr into the > > meta-openembedded repo. Before I go bothering Martin about it, what would > > be the best place t

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] recipes-efl inside meta-oe or meta-efl next to meta-oe?

2011-03-23 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:24:59PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 12:49 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > > I'd like to import the EFL recipes Martin did from meta-shr into the > > meta-openembedded repo. Before I go bothering Martin about it, what would > > be the best place to put