[OE-core] [pyro][PATCH] gcc: Use libssp_nonshared linker specs only for ppc/musl

Link libssp_nonshared.a only for ppc/musl because glibc already provides the content for libssp_nonshared in libc_nonshared.a and therefore we dont need to make it universal. (From OE-Core rev: c08247e3c7c004a40281d4010186a9ace86e0e47) Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/recipes-devtools/gcc

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] connman.inc: Add PACKAGECONFIG support for bluez5

On 04/01/2014 05:16 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 1 April 2014 14:41, Florin Sarbu wrote: Well, as far as I see it, these 2 packages (connman and libpcap) are aware only of bluez4 at the moment. ConnMan supports both, and libpcap uses the libbluetooth API so that should link fine against either

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] connman.inc: Add PACKAGECONFIG support for bluez5

nd no configurable way to use bluez5. Florin Regards, Cristian -Original Message- From: Florin Sarbu [mailto:florin.sa...@windriver.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 3:27 PM To: Iorga, Cristian Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Richard Purdie Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] connman.inc: A

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libpcap.inc: Add PACKAGECONFIG support for bluez

On 04/01/2014 01:47 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:16:40PM +0300, Florin Sarbu wrote: This patch adds support for having bluez5 in PACKAGECONFIG and get libpcap DEPEND on bluez5. Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/recipes-connectivity/libpcap/libpcap.inc | 5 +++-- 1

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] connman.inc: Add PACKAGECONFIG support for bluez5

esday, April 1, 2014 1:51 PM To: Sarbu, Florin-Ionut (Wind River) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] connman.inc: Add PACKAGECONFIG support for bluez5 On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 13:09 +0300, Florin Sarbu wrote: Currently connman can only RDEPEND on bluez4. This

[OE-core] [PATCH] libpcap.inc: Add PACKAGECONFIG support for bluez

This patch adds support for having bluez5 in PACKAGECONFIG and get libpcap DEPEND on bluez5. Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/recipes-connectivity/libpcap/libpcap.inc | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/libpcap/libpcap.inc b

[OE-core] [PATCH] connman.inc: Add PACKAGECONFIG support for bluez5

Currently connman can only RDEPEND on bluez4. This patch adds support for having bluez5 in PACKAGECONFIG and get connman RDEPEND on bluez5 if desired. Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman.inc | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] buildhistory.bbclass: Fix dependency files creation

On 03/26/2014 12:09 PM, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:15:43AM +, Sarbu, Florin-Ionut (Florin) wrote: I get the same error on do_rootfs for a rpm based image: Exception: UnboundLocalError: local variable 'new_arch' referenced before assignment Does this happen on latest

[OE-core] [bitbake-devel] bitbake: fetch2: Remove the unused urldata from the git fetcher.

Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py index b236631..a9470e4 100644 --- a/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py +++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] systemd: Fix packaging of pam config files.

Hi, did anybody have the time to look over this? Thanks. On 11/15/2013 02:10 PM, Florin Sarbu wrote: Removed early FILES_${PN} += for the pam config files which would subesequently be overwritten by a FILES_${PN} = . Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_208.bb

[OE-core] [PATCH] systemd: Fix packaging of pam config files.

Removed early FILES_${PN} += for the pam config files which would subesequently be overwritten by a FILES_${PN} = . Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_208.bb | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd

[OE-core] [PATCH] busybox.inc: Add -f to rm of ${D}${sysconfdir}/syslog-startup.conf.${BPN} to not error out when the busybox config used does not have SYSLOG enabled and DISTRO_FEATURES does not cont

Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc b/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc index 8b38c1a..454d7e3 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc +++ b

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] procps: Add cgroup support

Kindly ignore my last remark, I'm a little tired :) On 08/22/2013 08:26 AM, Sarbu, Florin-Ionut (Florin) wrote: This has been merged, but fails for me: ERROR: Command Error: exit status: 1 Output: Applying patch procps-3.2.8-ps-cgroup.patch patching file ps/output.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 1092 w

[OE-core] systemd 197 not mirrored

Had this email sent to p...@yoctoproject.org but maybe this mailing list is the better place to ask. Seems there is an issue downloading systemd 197 from the SRC_URI defined in the recipe. On the other hand, the mirrors don't have version 197 of systemd, but rather only 196. Anybody else gett

Re: [OE-core] systemd services in the rootfs

AGES, then it doesn't make too much sense to exist in my opinion, as it would just be an extra variable defined to do something that can be achieved without defining a extra variable. Florin On 02/14/2013 12:17 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 14 February 2013 09:09, Florin Sarbu wrote:

Re: [OE-core] systemd services in the rootfs

. Hope I cleared things up a little better now. Thanks, Florin On 02/14/2013 10:47 AM, Radu Moisan wrote: On 02/13/2013 05:33 PM, Florin Sarbu wrote: Hi all, following the transition of the systemd.bbclass from meta-openembedded to oe-core, I stumbled upon on what seems to me a missing featur

[OE-core] [PATCH] connman: Have connman package systemd service.

connman.inc was missing the SYSTEMD_PACKAGES variable. Declared ${PN}-systemd as the package containing the systemd service file and also added this package to PACKAGES variable. Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman.inc |5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3

[OE-core] systemd services in the rootfs

Hi all, following the transition of the systemd.bbclass from meta-openembedded to oe-core, I stumbled upon on what seems to me a missing feature that has not been brought along in the new systemd.bbclass in oe-core. Seems that if one does not explicitly specify the inclusion of the packages co

[OE-core] [PATCH] alsa-utils: add bash as a dependency of the alsa-utils-alsaconf rpm.

alsa-utils-alsaconf rpm contains the bash script alsaconf. In order to have the do_rootfs not error when bash is not brought along in the rootfs as an explicit dependency, we add it as a dependency of alsa-utils. Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.0.25.bb

Re: [OE-core] alsaconf and bash

But on the other hand, if the comment says the script is not suited for OE-core, then why have the alsa-utils rpm depend on the alsaconf rpm? Florin On 01/08/2013 06:27 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Florin Sarbu mailto:florin.sa...@windriver.com>>

Re: [OE-core] alsaconf and bash

Would you guys suggest we add bash as a dependency for alsa-utils? On 01/08/2013 08:09 AM, Florin Sarbu wrote: On 01/08/2013 02:44 AM, Chris Larson wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Florin Sarbu mailto:florin.sa...@windriver.com>> wrote: in alsa-utils_1.0.25.bb <ht

Re: [OE-core] alsaconf and bash

On 01/08/2013 02:44 AM, Chris Larson wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Florin Sarbu mailto:florin.sa...@windriver.com>> wrote: in alsa-utils_1.0.25.bb <http://alsa-utils_1.0.25.bb>, I see this comment: # We omit alsaconf, because # a) this is a bash script

[OE-core] alsaconf and bash

Hi all, in alsa-utils_1.0.25.bb, I see this comment: # We omit alsaconf, because # a) this is a bash script # b) it creates config files not suitable for OE-based distros Trying out on master, I get a do_rootfs error because bash is not a rundep of alsa-utils, and there is nothing in the alsa-u

Re: [OE-core] binutils fails to set ld.gold as default

You're right, the symbolic link pointing to this "regular" ld confused me. Looking at it's version, it clearly says gold. Thank you. On 09/23/2012 06:41 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Florin Sarbu wrote: What exactly do you wanna see in the ou

Re: [OE-core] binutils fails to set ld.gold as default

What exactly do you wanna see in the output? I can post the variables you are looking for. Florin On 09/22/2012 12:53 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Florin Sarbu wrote: It is enabled. As I said earlier, ld.gold gets created, it's just that ld is not pointing

Re: [OE-core] binutils fails to set ld.gold as default

like yes. Just to be extra sure, I did try to add the extra space as you suggested but the behaviour is the same. Thanks, Florin On 09/21/2012 04:58 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 16:32 +0300, Florin Sarbu wrote: Hi all, I am facing an issue trying to use ld.gold as the default

[OE-core] binutils fails to set ld.gold as default

Hi all, I am facing an issue trying to use ld.gold as the default ld on a poky build. I've added to my build's conf/local.conf DISTRO_FEATURES_append = "ld-is-gold" so I get in tmp-eglibc-eglibc/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/bin/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi the following (amongst others): arm-

[OE-core] [PATCH] intltool: Add Upstream-Status and Signed-off-by to remove-xml-check.patch

Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- .../intltool-0.50.0/remove-xml-check.patch |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/intltool/intltool-0.50.0/remove-xml-check.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/intltool/intltool-0.50.0/remove-xml

[OE-core] [PATCH] Add MPL version 2.0 license in common-licenses dir as well as adding a non-SPDX license name in license.bbclass

Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/classes/license.bbclass |1 + meta/files/common-licenses/MPL-2.0 | 373 2 files changed, 374 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/MPL-2.0 diff --git a/meta/classes

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] Update intltool to version 0.50.0

Ping? On 04/20/2012 10:52 AM, Florin Sarbu wrote: Uprev intltool to newer 0.50.0 version Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- .../intltool-0.40.6/intltool-nowarn-0.40.0.patch | 52 .../intltool-0.50.0/intltool-nowarn-0.50.0.patch | 42

Re: [OE-core] dbus test suite

On 05/29/2012 12:41 PM, Radu Moisan wrote: On 05/29/2012 12:28 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Radu Moisan > wrote: How do I add something in the dependency chain? With --enable-test dbus fails at do_configure complaining about

Re: [OE-core] Linux-yocto 3.0 crashes at do_patch...

Same for me again on a try today: | build/tmp-eglibc-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/scc: line 399: yocto/standard/beagleboard-standard: No such file or directory | ERROR. Could not find an excutable target for yocto/standard/base | ERROR. Could not locate meta series for yocto/standard/be

Re: [OE-core] Linux-yocto 3.0 crashes at do_patch...

I confirm I still encounter the same error. On 05/17/2012 01:09 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: Today i ran into an issue that Florin Sarbu signaled sometime last week. It seems like do_patch crashes while compiling linux 3.0: ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /media/HDD-WRS/yocto/2012

[OE-core] [PATCH v3] Update intltool to version 0.50.0

Uprev intltool to newer 0.50.0 version Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- .../intltool-0.40.6/intltool-nowarn-0.40.0.patch | 52 .../intltool-0.50.0/intltool-nowarn-0.50.0.patch | 42 .../noperlcheck.patch |8

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] Update intltool to version 0.50.0

Uprev to version 0.50.0 Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- .../intltool-0.40.6/intltool-nowarn-0.40.0.patch | 52 .../intltool-0.50.0/intltool-nowarn-0.50.0.patch | 42 .../noperlcheck.patch |4 +- .../remove-xml

[OE-core] [PATCH] Update intltool to version 0.50.0

Uprev to version 0.50.0 and move SRC_URI from .inc into the .bb specifying the version Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- .../intltool-0.40.6/intltool-nowarn-0.40.0.patch | 52 .../intltool/intltool-0.40.6/noperlcheck.patch | 40 --- .../intltool-0.40.6

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] vala: Add vala package as a devtool (version 0.12.1)

caused On 04/12/2012 09:28 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 11 apr. 2012 om 18:07 heeft Florin Sarbu het volgende geschreven: Added the vala package from meta-oe to support future systemd integration. But systemd doesn't need vala.. Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/recipes-devtools

[OE-core] [PATCH] vala: Add vala package as a devtool (version 0.12.1)

Added the vala package from meta-oe to support future systemd integration. Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/recipes-devtools/vala/vala.inc | 25 + meta/recipes-devtools/vala/vala_0.12.1.bb |7 +++ 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions

[OE-core] [PATCH] vala: Add vala package as a devtool (version 0.12.1)

Added the vala package from meta-oe to support future systemd integration. Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/recipes-devtools/vala/vala.inc | 25 + meta/recipes-devtools/vala/vala_0.12.1.bb |7 +++ 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions

[OE-core] [PATCH] vala: Add vala package as a devtool (version 0.12.1)

Added the vala package from meta-oe to support future systemd integration. Signed-off-by: Florin Sarbu --- meta/recipes-devtools/vala/vala.inc | 25 + meta/recipes-devtools/vala/vala_0.12.1.bb |7 +++ 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions