Steve
On 12/9/20 2:23 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:03 AM Dan Murphy wrote:
Steve
No it has some enhancements.
If it has enhancements then it probably isn't appropriate for LTS, we
should stick with 1.9.2
OK
I was not sure if we wanted to use the dev
branch as oppose
, Dec 9, 2020 at 9:21 AM Dan Murphy via lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
From: Alexander Kanavin
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
meta/recipes-support/lz4/{lz4_1.9.2.bb => lz4_1.9.3.bb} | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
From: Alexander Kanavin
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
meta/recipes-support/lz4/{lz4_1.9.2.bb => lz4_1.9.3.bb} | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-support/lz4/{lz4_1.9.2.bb => lz4_1.9.3.bb
From: Richard Purdie
Upstream renamed master -> dev, update SRC_URI to match.
[YOCTO #14135]
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
meta/recipes-support/lz4/lz4_1.9.2.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/lz4/lz4_1.9.
From: "changqing...@windriver.com"
Signed-off-by: Changqing Li
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy
---
.../thin-provisioning-tools/thin-provisioning-tools_0.8.5.bb| 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
a/meta-oe/recipes-support/thin-provisioning-t
Steve
Awesome thanks!
The 3 patches will fix our issues
Dan
On 12/4/20 4:18 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
I sent a pull request yesterday for a series that includes this patch.
Richard will probably merge it to dunfell in the next day or two.
Steve
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:30 AM Dan Murphy
Konrad
On 12/4/20 3:35 PM, Konrad Weihmann wrote:
I would include dunfell maintainer, so he can pick that up in his next
patch bump
CC: st...@sakoman.com
Thanks for the info.
I am currently backporting them now locally just to make sure they fix
my issue.
Apparently there are 3 patches o
Hello
How do we get this patch below backported to dunfell?
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass?h=gatesgarth&id=d9e327063f63193186822d958706081d64ec8139
We at TI are seeing similar issues with Dunfell and cryptodev modules on
5.10 builds.
Dan