Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] cmake: 3.14.5 -> 3.15.1

2019-08-08 Thread Bach, Pascal
CMake 3.15.2 got released in the meantime. I will submit an update to that version directly. Please ignore this patch. > -Original Message- > From: Pascal Bach > Sent: Donnerstag, 8. August 2019 09:01 > To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Cc: Bach, Pascal (

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] cmake.bbclass: pass mandatory compiler flags through CMAKE__COMPILER_ARG1

2019-05-14 Thread Bach, Pascal
Hi Nikolai, I think this would work. However I would like to understand the problem you are trying to solve with this. Do you have an example of a recipe this would be needed? Pascal > -Original Message- > From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > On Behalf Of > Nikolai

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] bitbake.conf: add git-lfs to HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL

2019-04-17 Thread Bach, Pascal
> > > Your "everyone has to install it" worry misses the much bigger > > > problem that git-lfs is a relatively new tool and not available in > > > distributions like Debian 9 or Ubuntu 16.04. > > > > Someone could certainly write a native recipe for lfs and add that as > > a dependency which would

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/3] cmake-native: Enable ccmake by default and depend on ncurses

2019-04-03 Thread Bach, Pascal
> > Enable the building of the curses based ui for cmake. This depends on > ncurses. I think this is acceptable. It might also be useful for people wanting to use ccmake inside an SDK. > Signed-off-by: Nathan Rossi > --- > This patch suggests enabling this in the cmake-native recipe, however t

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] cmake: 3.14.0 -> 3.14.1

2019-04-03 Thread Bach, Pascal
This patch should also go into warrior as I think we should not ship 3.14.0 due to the issue mentioned bellow. > -Original Message- > From: Pascal Bach > Sent: Montag, 1. April 2019 14:17 > To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Cc: Bach, Pascal (BT CPS R&D ZG

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] nfs-utils: build tools with target compiler

2019-02-14 Thread Bach, Pascal
> Will you be sending that fix upstream too? I'm planning to. However I'm struggling a bit to figure out where exactly I should send this patch. It's not clear to me how the nfs-utils project is structured. > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 16:16, Pascal Bach > wrote: > > > > Some tools were built wi

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] cmake: update to 3.13.4

2019-02-12 Thread Bach, Pascal
Hi Otavio > Hello Pascal, > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:51 AM Pascal Bach > wrote: > > All patches have been rebased on top of the 3.13.4 release. > > Most patches had no changes (even on ranges) and it'd be good to avoid > touching those files so we can keep the patch to the smaller changeset

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] cmake: add CMAKE_SYSROOT to generated toolchain file

2018-09-28 Thread Bach, Pascal
> since it was staged in oe-core/master-next, it got into my testing queue and > is causing several recipes FTBFS > > see > > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Build/66877/ I did some digging and it seems all of these failures are related. Each of them is adding the host path /usr/include s

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] cmake: add CMAKE_SYSROOT to generated toolchain file

2018-08-24 Thread Bach, Pascal
> > Fixes problems which we have also seen on sumo branch. Thanks for this! > > Sorry, spoke too soon. This fixes compilation on a few recipes in my tree but > there are still lots failures with the same error message. We had a hacky > patch to cmake as a workaround but that too causes some prob

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] cmake.bbclass: set archiver, linker and ranlib in toolchain.cmake

2015-07-17 Thread Bach, Pascal
Hi > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier [mailto:ste...@herbrechtsmeier.net] > Sent: Freitag, 17. Juli 2015 12:56 > To: Bach, Pascal; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] cmake.bbclass: set archiver, linker and ranlib >

Re: [OE-core] [yocto] Move device tree generation from include file to bbclass

2015-04-16 Thread Bach, Pascal
Hi Bruce, Hi Nikolay > > >>> > >>> Adding oe-core, since that's the right place to have a discussion > >>> like this. Thanks I'm never sure where to ask what :) > >>> > As ARM now also moved to device tree it look like in future we > will > have more kernels that are using device t

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image_types.bbclass: Make ubi depend on ubifs

2014-11-05 Thread Bach, Pascal
> > > } > > > > +IMAGE_TYPEDEP_ubi = "ubifs" > > > > + > > > > > > 'ubifs' or 'ubifs-native'? > > > > IMAGE_TYPEDEP describes dependencies between image types. So in this > > case ubifs referred to IMAGE_CMD_ubifs > > I'm not aware that there is ubifs-native image type. > > -- > > Any chance this

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image_types.bbclass: Make ubi depend on ubifs

2014-11-05 Thread Bach, Pascal
> > > > } > > > +IMAGE_TYPEDEP_ubi = "ubifs" > > > + > > > > 'ubifs' or 'ubifs-native'? > > IMAGE_TYPEDEP describes dependencies between image types. So in this > case ubifs referred to IMAGE_CMD_ubifs > I'm not aware that there is ubifs-native image type. > -- Any chance this gets included? Pa

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image_types.bbclass: Make ubi depend on ubifs

2014-10-27 Thread Bach, Pascal
> > } > > +IMAGE_TYPEDEP_ubi = "ubifs" > > + > > 'ubifs' or 'ubifs-native'? IMAGE_TYPEDEP describes dependencies between image types. So in this case ubifs referred to IMAGE_CMD_ubifs I'm not aware that there is ubifs-native image type. -- ___ Openemb

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] cmake: Try and improve cleaning of builds when B==S

2014-10-24 Thread Bach, Pascal
Just a note it should be sufficient to delete the CMakeCache.txt file to force CMake to reconfigure. But deleting the rest doesn't hurt. Pascal > -Original Message- > From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Beh