On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 20:12, Steve Sakoman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:28 AM Khem Raj wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/24/21 8:09 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 12:26 AM Anton Kachalov via
> > > lists.openembedde
> to force clean the deleted files on overlayfs upperdir. However, it
> > will mean that all the scripts regardless if they are updated or not,
> > will be re-executed after rootfs update.
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 17:08, Mike Looijmans > <mailto:mike.looijm...@t
herlands
>
> T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69 <+31%20499%20336%20969>
> E: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
> W: www.topic.nl
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> On 22-03-2021 16:45, Anton Kachalov via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > From:
From: "Anton D. Kachalov"
When running on read-only rootfs backed with overlayfs, the processed scripts
are being marked as deleted on upperdir of overlayfs. When it comes to
upgrade the main read-only image, it might contain new postinst scripts that
are different from the already processed. Int
From: "Anton D. Kachalov"
When running on the systems having read-only rootfs backed by overlayfs,
removing the whole directory lead to create a special char device file
on the upperdir to reflect directory's removal. Once it is required to
upgrade the whole read-only image that might contain new
Hi, Richard.
Thanks! I've expected some kind of ack :)
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 13:51, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 12:39 +0100, Anton Kachalov via
> lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > Ping on the patch
>
> I
Ping on the patch
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 16:43, Anton Kachalov via lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
> Example use case in OpenBMC: rootfs is squashfs and the system has either
> overlayfs for whole rootfs or for some parts (e.g. /etc).
>
> This option will allow to create migrat
Perhaps, I'm doing something wrong, but setting this variable in
build/conf/local.conf makes packages fail to build (do_install): only those
which fail with pseudo before (linux-libc-headers and base-files).
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 18:15, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Hello,
nope, setting the entire PSEUDO_IGNORE_PATHS without "/usr" doesn't work.
The do_install task fails with error code 134 without any log file. Neither
temp/run.do_install file exists. The pseudo.log doesn't have any errors.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 19:22, Peter Kjellerstedt <
peter.kjellerst.
Example use case in OpenBMC: rootfs is squashfs and the system has either
overlayfs for whole rootfs or for some parts (e.g. /etc).
This option will allow to create migration one-shot postinsts using
"pkg_postinst_ontarget_${PN}" routines defined in recipes to fix
files under upper workdir in over
chard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 22:58 +0100, Anton Kachalov via
> lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > Allow the Yocto's building tree to be placed under /usr.
> >
> > Relevant issue: https://github.com/openbmc/o
Allow the Yocto's building tree to be placed under /usr.
Relevant issue: https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/issues/3724
Signed-off-by: Anton D. Kachalov
---
meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
12 matches
Mail list logo
