Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad: add PACKAGECONFIG for onevpl

Please ignore this patch. It needs some re-work ! Regards, Naveen > -Original Message- > From: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org c...@lists.openembedded.org> On Behalf Of Naveen Saini > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 12:47 PM > To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Subject

[OE-core] [dunfell][PATCH] libtirpc: CVE-2021-46828 DoS vulnerability with lots of connections

Source: http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=steved/libtirpc.git; MR: 120231 Type: Security Fix Disposition: Backport from http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=steved/libtirpc.git;a=commit;h=86529758570cef4c73fb9b9c4104fdc510f701ed ChangeID: 544120a5f10a4717cd2c7291821a012e26b14b7f Description: CVE-2021-468

[OE-core] [PATCH] gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad: add PACKAGECONFIG for onevpl

Allow user to build this plugin against MFX version 2.2+ (oneVPL) https://github.com/GStreamer/gst-plugins-bad/commit/beda9a73339bef878e95798f629a868c647627ce Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini --- .../gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad_1.20.3.bb | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH v2] classes: rootfs-postcommands: autologin root on serial-getty

good question, haven't had a sysvinit system in ages... so no easy "let's test it on this platform" :-s do you happen to have one? should the patch include a warning to sysvinit users like "not supported" "config switch only applies to systemd" ... suggestions? (-: the only sysvinit+getty refe

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2]] recipes-support: rng-tools change systemd service name

On 7/27/22 10:51 AM, An?bal Lim?n wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 5:44 AM Luca Ceresoli > wrote: Hello Aníbal, On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 14:33:22 -0500 "An?bal Lim?n" mailto:limon.ani...@gmail.com>> wrote: > From: Aníbal Limón mailto:limon.ani..

Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][master][PATCH] apt: fix do_package_qa failure

On 7/27/22 19:51, Alexander Kanavin wrote: [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] What is actually being installed in there? Is it really right to remove it? An empty dir apt is installed under /var/log/. It should be ok to remove it since apt could create it when it d

[OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] libtirpc: CVE-2021-46828 DoS vulnerability with lots of connections

Source: http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=steved/libtirpc.git; MR: 120225 Type: Security Fix Disposition: Backport from http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=steved/libtirpc.git;a=commit;h=86529758570cef4c73fb9b9c4104fdc510f701ed ChangeID: 29c32ee171a6a47e06c788e5c608fac9bb3a64b2 Description: CVE-2021-468

[OE-core][PATCH] grub2: fix several CVEs

Backport CVE patches from upstream to fix: CVE-2021-3695 CVE-2021-3696 CVE-2021-3697 CVE-2022-28733 CVE-2022-28734 CVE-2022-28735 CVE-2022-28736 Backport the following 5 patches to make CVE patches be applied smoothly. video-Remove-trailing-whitespaces.patch video-readers-jpeg-Ab

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libusb1: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins

> The patch sanity check should warn about it as it does for the status header. > I said, RP can add it. Easier said than done when a patch already contains S-o-b and we want to allow people to S-o-b from their corporate accounts whilst posting patches from their personal account. Ross -- Otav

Re: [oe-core][kirkstone][PATCH 1/1] lua: Backport fix for CVE-2022-33099

This patch is in the set currently out for review: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/168524 So it should hit kirkstone in the next few days. Steve On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 7:48 AM Joe Slater wrote: > > From: Khem Raj > > Fixes stack overflow while handling recurring

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libusb1: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins

Adding s-o-b in behalf of others is not allowed, it's akin to a signature - it literally says 'signed off by me'. The only s-o-b you can add is your own. Besides, RP should not be fixing up things for you, and when he does it's a favour and not an entitlement. Alex On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 18:56,

[oe-core][kirkstone][PATCH 1/1] lua: Backport fix for CVE-2022-33099

From: Khem Raj Fixes stack overflow while handling recurring errors in Lua-stack Signed-off-by: Khem Raj Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie (cherry picked from commit caad9d5f7184f0fa60fa7770e5d3da3f533647cb) Signed-off-by: Joe Slater --- .../lua/lua/CVE-2022-33099.patch | 61 +++

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] oeqa/sdk: Add basic rust cargo test

Em qua., 27 de jul. de 2022 às 13:48, Luca Ceresoli via lists.openembedded.org escreveu: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:24:12 +0100 > "Richard Purdie" wrote: > > > From: Otavio Salvador > > > > Add a QA test to the SDK to test that a basic cargo build works. > > > > [RP: Tweaked to work for multilibs

[OE-core] [PATCH] create-spdx: Fix supplier field

The correct field name is "supplier" according to SPDX schema. The "supplier" field translates to "PackageSupplier", but that's for tag-value format. Signed-off-by: Mihai Lindner --- meta/classes/create-spdx.bbclass | 6 +++--- meta/lib/oe/spdx.py | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertio

Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH] wic/direct.py: ignore root mountpoint in fstab updater

But looking at the commit that introduced the problem, I see that it completely undoes it. In general, I like the idea of having the fstab_updater create the root entry, but for this to work without duplication, the /dev/root entry would have to be removed from fstab. This would force any wic im

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libusb1: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins

Sent :-) Em qua., 27 de jul. de 2022 às 13:45, Khem Raj escreveu: > > > On 7/27/22 12:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > > > > Em qua., 27 de jul. de 2022 às 13:35, Ross Burton > > escreveu: > > > > Whoever adds the patch needs to add their S-o-b. > > > > > > Th

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] libusb1: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins

Backport a fix from 1.0.27 so we only link atomic if no atomic builtins are available. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador --- Changes in v2: - add signed-off-by ...k-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bui.patch | 53 +++ meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1_1.0.26.bb | 1 + 2 files cha

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libusb1: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins

On 7/27/22 12:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: Em qua., 27 de jul. de 2022 às 13:35, Ross Burton > escreveu: Whoever adds the patch needs to add their S-o-b. The patch sanity check should warn about it as it does for the status header. I said, RP can add it.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libusb1: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins

Em qua., 27 de jul. de 2022 às 13:35, Ross Burton escreveu: > Whoever adds the patch needs to add their S-o-b. > The patch sanity check should warn about it as it does for the status header. I said, RP can add it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libusb1: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins

Whoever adds the patch needs to add their S-o-b. Ross From: Otavio Salvador Date: Wednesday, 27 July 2022 at 17:20 To: Ross Burton , Purdie, Richard Cc: ota...@ossystems.com.br , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libusb1: Link with -latomic only if no a

Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH] wic/direct.py: ignore root mountpoint in fstab updater

Yes. With the patch the warning disappears from dmesg Am Mi, 27. Jul 2022 um 15:44:48 + schrieb Ross Burton : This looks like a fix for , can you confirm that? Ross On 27 Jul 2022, at 14:45, Markus Volk via lists.openembedded.org

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libusb1: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins

Em qua., 27 de jul. de 2022 às 12:28, Ross Burton escreveu: > The patch is missing your S-o-b. > The patch isn't mine but a backport. Richard can add it when adding it to MUT, though. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.brhttp://code.oss

Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH] wic/direct.py: ignore root mountpoint in fstab updater

This looks like a fix for https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14865, can you confirm that? Ross > On 27 Jul 2022, at 14:45, Markus Volk via lists.openembedded.org > wrote: > > We already have a root entry in fstab. This commit prevents processing root > mountpoint in fstab_updat

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] debian packaging: set md5sums for conffiles

Will do. On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 8:35 AM Alexander Kanavin wrote: > I think Ross is merely helping you to reach the correct solution, but > everyone would appreciate if you write and submit the actual fix :-) > > Alex > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 16:32, Rusty Howell wrote: > > > > Thanks for the

Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH v2] classes: rootfs-postcommands: autologin root on serial-getty

> +serial_autologin_root () { > + if [ -e ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}${systemd_system_unitdir}/serial-getty@.service > ]; then > + sed -i '/^\s*ExecStart\b/ s/getty /&--autologin root /' \ > + > "${IMAGE_ROOTFS}${systemd_system_unitdir}/serial-getty@.service" > + fi >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libusb1: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins

The patch is missing your S-o-b. Ross > On 27 Jul 2022, at 13:00, Otavio Salvador via lists.openembedded.org > wrote: > > Backport a fix from 1.0.27 so we only link atomic if no atomic builtins > are available. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > --- > ...k-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bu

Re: [yocto] [Openembedded-architecture] Let's drop x86-x32 (was Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/51] rpm: update 4.17.0 -> 4.17.1)

On Wed, 2022-07-27 at 16:56 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 at 17:46, Alexander Kanavin via > lists.yoctoproject.org > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 at 17:41, Mittal, Anuj > > wrote: > > > I don't know if there are any Yocto users of it who might notice. > > > > > >

Re: [yocto] [Openembedded-architecture] Let's drop x86-x32 (was Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/51] rpm: update 4.17.0 -> 4.17.1)

On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 at 17:46, Alexander Kanavin via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 at 17:41, Mittal, Anuj wrote: > > I don't know if there are any Yocto users of it who might notice. > > > > Instead of dropping the testing completely, may be we should switch to > > building

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2]] recipes-support: rng-tools change systemd service name

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 5:44 AM Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Hello Aníbal, > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 14:33:22 -0500 > "An?bal Lim?n" wrote: > > > From: Aníbal Limón > > > > Change systemd service name from rngd -> rng-tools to avoid load twice > > the service when sysvinit compatibility is enabled, > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] debian packaging: set md5sums for conffiles

I think Ross is merely helping you to reach the correct solution, but everyone would appreciate if you write and submit the actual fix :-) Alex On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 16:32, Rusty Howell wrote: > > Thanks for the quick responses. It took us a while to figure out why we > were seeing weird beh

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] debian packaging: set md5sums for conffiles

Thanks for the quick responses. It took us a while to figure out why we were seeing weird behaviour with our products, and we ultimately figured out the conffiles are being replaced during the update. I am working off of Hardknott currently, so that's my mistake not switching to master. And I

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] debian packaging: set md5sums for conffiles

> So we’re definitely not generating the DEBIAN/md5sums files that dpkg-deb > likes to have. However, this file in proper Debian packages doesn’t contain > hashes for the conffiles, so I can only imagine that dpkg generates them on > install, which leads to the question of where that is meant to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] debian packaging: set md5sums for conffiles

So we’re definitely not generating the DEBIAN/md5sums files that dpkg-deb likes to have. However, this file in proper Debian packages doesn’t contain hashes for the conffiles, so I can only imagine that dpkg generates them on install, which leads to the question of where that is meant to happen.

[OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH] wic/direct.py: ignore root mountpoint in fstab updater

We already have a root entry in fstab. This commit prevents processing root mountpoint in fstab_updater and thus avoids duplicate entries for root in fstab. Signed-off-by: Markus Volk --- scripts/lib/wic/plugins/imager/direct.py | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] debian packaging: set md5sums for conffiles

> On 27 Jul 2022, at 12:48, Alexander Kanavin via lists.openembedded.org > wrote: > > Also, I'm not sure I understand why this needs to be fixed with custom > code. Isn't this something that dpkg/apt take care of themselves? Yes, I suspect this is a problem with how we’re generating the DEBIAN

[OE-core] [PATCH] libusb1: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins

Backport a fix from 1.0.27 so we only link atomic if no atomic builtins are available. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador --- ...k-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bui.patch | 51 +++ meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1_1.0.26.bb | 1 + 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+) create mode 1

[OE-core] [RFC][PATCHv2] glibc: revert one upstream change to work around broken DEBUG_BUILD build

* work around for build failure with DEBUG_BUILD: http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/661468/ TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/glibc/2.35-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-oe-linux/../../libexec/x86_64-oe-linux/gcc/x86_64-oe-linux/11.3.0/ld.bfd: TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work

Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][master][PATCH] apt: fix do_package_qa failure

What is actually being installed in there? Is it really right to remove it? Alex On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 07:39, Changqing Li wrote: > > From: Changqing Li > > bitbake nativesdk-apt failed with error: > ERROR: nativesdk-apt-2.4.5-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: nativesdk-apt installs > files in > /

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] debian packaging: set md5sums for conffiles

Also, I'm not sure I understand why this needs to be fixed with custom code. Isn't this something that dpkg/apt take care of themselves? Alex On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 12:53, Luca Ceresoli via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > Hello Rusty, > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:13:28 -0600 > "Rusty Howell" wr

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] wic: add target tools to PATH when executing native commands

We might want to run a cross tool, such as objcopy, in wic. These are in a TARGET_SYS/ subdirectory under /usr/bin, so add that directory to the search path too. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- scripts/lib/wic/misc.py | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/scr

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] wic/bootimg-efi: use cross objcopy when building unified kernel image

We can't rely on the host objcopy knowing how to process target binaries, so use the cross objcopy in the sysroot instead. Also construct the command argument-by-argument as the format expression was getting unwieldy. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/bootimg-efi.py

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] wic: depend on cross-binutils

Wic can build an unified kernel image, but this needs the cross-objcopy from binutils. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/classes/image_types_wic.bbclass | 2 ++ meta/recipes-core/meta/wic-tools.bb | 1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta/classes/image_types_wic.bbclass b/me

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] debian packaging: set md5sums for conffiles

Hello Rusty, On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:13:28 -0600 "Rusty Howell" wrote: > Currently in an image created with debian package management, dpkg is missing > the md5sums in > /var/lib/dpkg/status for files designated as conffiles. They are just listed > as "newconffile", > which is an intermediate

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2]] recipes-support: rng-tools change systemd service name

Hello Aníbal, On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 14:33:22 -0500 "An?bal Lim?n" wrote: > From: Aníbal Limón > > Change systemd service name from rngd -> rng-tools to avoid load twice > the service when sysvinit compatibility is enabled, > > ... > root@:~# ps | grep rng >23 root 0 SW [hwrng] >

Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH v3] classes: rootfs-postcommands: autologin root on serial-getty

On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 05:37:39 +0200 "Johannes Schneider via lists.openembedded.org" wrote: > when empty-root-password AND serial-autologin-root are part of the > IMAGE_FEATURES, save some of the developers time by not having to type > the (then still sole) 'root' username on the serial consoleafte

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] lame: Remove hardcoded rpaths

I thought of that myself, but did not yet investigate. We have hardcode_into_libs disabling in 4 "recipes": git grep hardcode_into_libs -- meta recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0009-Use-libtool-2.4.patch: hardcode_into_libs=yes recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0009-Use-libtool-2.4.patch: if

[OE-core] [dunfell][PATCH] libTiff: CVE-2022-2056 CVE-2022-2057 CVE-2022-2058 DoS from Divide By Zero Error

Source: https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff MR: 119341 Type: Security Fix Disposition: Backport from https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/commit/dd1bcc7abb26094e93636e85520f0d8f81ab0fab ChangeID: 6cea4937a34a618567a42cef8c41961ade2f3a07 Description: CVE-2022-2056 CVE-2022-2057 CVE-2022-2058

[OE-core] [dunfell][PATCH] qemu: CVE-2022-35414 can perform an uninitialized read on the translate_fail path, leading to an io_readx or io_writex crash

Source: https://github.com/qemu/qemu MR: 119832 Type: Security Fix Disposition: Backport from https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/418ade7849ce7641c0f7333718caf5091a02fd4c ChangeID: 1246afd7bb950d2d5fe2e198961797c0fa14ac00 Description: CVE-2022-35414 qemu: can perform an uninitialized read

Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH v3] classes: rootfs-postcommands: autologin root on serial-getty

Hi, what & where would you like to see (as) additional documentation? (-: regards From: Marta Rybczynska Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2022 09:27 To: SCHNEIDER Johannes Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH v3] classes: rootfs-postcommands: autologin

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] mesa: fix compile error when debug build enabled

From: Kai Kang It fails to compile mesa{,-native} when DEBUG_BUILD is enabled: ../mesa-22.1.3/src/compiler/nir/nir_inline_helpers.h: In function ‘nir_opt_move_block’: ../mesa-22.1.3/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_move.c:55:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘src_is_ssa’: indirect f

Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH v3] classes: rootfs-postcommands: autologin root on serial-getty

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 5:37 AM Johannes Schneider via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > when empty-root-password AND serial-autologin-root are part of the > IMAGE_FEATURES, save some of the developers time by not having to type > the (then still sole) 'root' username on the serial consoleafter ea