Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] glibc: Remove site_config and glibc-initial

2018-12-20 Thread Yang, Liezhi
Hi Randy, Sorry, I am OOO today, will do it next week. BTW, I have looked into siteconfig and siteinfo recently, and have some crazy ideas on them, which seems can save a lot of configure time, I will try to send them out next week. // Robert Sent from mobile phone > 在 2018年12月21日,10:22,Mark

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] oeqa/concurrencytest: fix for locating meta-selftest

2018-12-20 Thread Yang, Liezhi
Hi RP, Sorry, I am on vacation today, will do more investigations next week. // Robert Sent from mobile phone > 在 2018年12月20日,23:06,Richard Purdie 写道: > > On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 12:19 +, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org > wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 18:43 +0800, Robert Yang >> wrote:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] glibc: Remove site_config and glibc-initial

2018-12-20 Thread Mark Hatle
On 12/20/18 1:50 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 18:02, Mark Hatle wrote: >> As far as zlib/ncurses being the only things that augmented them, when this >> was >> originally implemented many years ago -- those items were the most commonly >> used >> by other configure scripts.

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for "gnupg: Do not apply -Woverride..." and 1 more

2018-12-20 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: "gnupg: Do not apply -Woverride..." and 1 more Revision: 1 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/15438/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] nfs-utils: Disable format-overflow as Werror

2018-12-20 Thread Khem Raj
These warnings are intricate and we can ignore that for now as they are being found by gcc 9, eventually this should be not needed when code upstream is fixed Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-connectivity/nfs-utils/nfs-utils_2.3.3.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] gnupg: Do not apply -Woverride-init guard for gcc >= 9

2018-12-20 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...erride-init-is-not-needed-with-gcc-9.patch | 31 +++ ...-a-custom-value-for-the-location-of-.patch | 6 ++-- .../gnupg/gnupg/relocate.patch| 2 +- meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_2.2.12.bb| 3 +- 4 files changed, 37 insertions

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] patch: reproducibility: Fix host umask leakage

2018-12-20 Thread Douglas Royds
I haven't sent this as a "v2", because of the change of subject line. On 21/12/18 12:10 PM, Douglas Royds wrote: Some patch files create entirely new files, so their permissions are subject to the host umask. If such a file is later installed into a package with no change in permissions, it br

[OE-core] [PATCH] patch: reproducibility: Fix host umask leakage

2018-12-20 Thread Douglas Royds
Some patch files create entirely new files, so their permissions are subject to the host umask. If such a file is later installed into a package with no change in permissions, it breaks the reproducibility of the package. This was observed on libpam, for instance: The patch file pam-security-abstr

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libpam: reproducibility: Fix host umask leakage at patch-time

2018-12-20 Thread Douglas Royds
On 21/12/18 9:37 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 20:26, Douglas Royds wrote: libpam is unusual in having a patch that creates an entirely new file (tty_secure.c). If that patch eventually goes, then this umask setting can go as well. I haven't come across any other cases of a p

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libpam: reproducibility: Fix host umask leakage at patch-time

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 20:37, Burton, Ross wrote: > > I haven't come across any other cases of a patch creating a file, but if > > there are, then we could certainly move this setting. Perhaps we should > > wait until others emerge. > > I definitely wouldn't want to make the assumption that libpam

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libpam: reproducibility: Fix host umask leakage at patch-time

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 20:26, Douglas Royds wrote: > libpam is unusual in having a patch that creates an entirely new file > (tty_secure.c). If that patch eventually goes, then this umask setting > can go as well. > > I haven't come across any other cases of a patch creating a file, but if > there

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libpam: reproducibility: Fix host umask leakage at patch-time

2018-12-20 Thread Douglas Royds
libpam is unusual in having a patch that creates an entirely new file (tty_secure.c). If that patch eventually goes, then this umask setting can go as well. I haven't come across any other cases of a patch creating a file, but if there are, then we could certainly move this setting. Perhaps we

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] glibc: Remove site_config and glibc-initial

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 18:02, Mark Hatle wrote: > As far as zlib/ncurses being the only things that augmented them, when this > was > originally implemented many years ago -- those items were the most commonly > used > by other configure scripts. So adding those defaults when zlib and/or ncurse

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] glibc: Remove site_config and glibc-initial

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 18:02, Mark Hatle wrote: > We also still want a way that manual definitions can be setup on a global > basis > for a given architecture. (We do want these limited for the most part, since > maintenance is overlooked -- but we've certainly seen cases in the past where > con

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] [RFC] go.bbclass: install dependencies under $GOPATH instead of $GOROOT

2018-12-20 Thread Damien Riegel
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 11:00, Matt Madison wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:02 AM Damien Riegel wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 07:53, Matt Madison wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 5:52 PM Damien Riegel > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 16:41, Matt Madison

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] glibc: Remove site_config and glibc-initial

2018-12-20 Thread Mark Hatle
On 12/20/18 7:02 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 11:59, wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 11:50 +, Burton, Ross wrote: >>> As the only users of siteconfig are now zlib and ncurses, should we >>> just rip it out entirely leaving a gap for a fresh implementation? >> >> I'm cc'ing

Re: [OE-core] flto automake

2018-12-20 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 7:48 AM Burton, Ross wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 15:37, Khem Raj wrote: > > > Well, I built core-image-sato core-image-weston with AR=gcc-ar > > > RANLIB=gcc-ranlib globally and it worked fine. > > > > Please build a lot more. These images cover only handful of recip

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for "nativesdk-meson: add missing d..." and 2 more

2018-12-20 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: "nativesdk-meson: add missing d..." and 2 more Revision: 1 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/15436/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] [RFC] go.bbclass: install dependencies under $GOPATH instead of $GOROOT

2018-12-20 Thread Matt Madison
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:02 AM Damien Riegel wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 07:53, Matt Madison wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 5:52 PM Damien Riegel > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 16:41, Matt Madison wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:51 AM Damien Riege

Re: [OE-core] flto automake

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 15:37, Khem Raj wrote: > > Well, I built core-image-sato core-image-weston with AR=gcc-ar > > RANLIB=gcc-ranlib globally and it worked fine. > > Please build a lot more. These images cover only handful of recipes > there are problems like > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

Re: [OE-core] flto automake

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 15:37, Khem Raj wrote: > > As we build the cross gcc we know what is in it. Other toolchains be > > they clang, ICC, or external GCCs, can override AR just like they do > > the other variables. > > Yes they can, but what doe this buy us ? except we make Core toolchain > gcc

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] oeqa/sdk: add test to exercise Meson

2018-12-20 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/lib/oeqa/sdk/cases/buildepoxy.py | 36 +++ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/lib/oeqa/sdk/cases/buildepoxy.py diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/sdk/cases/buildepoxy.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/sdk/cases/buildepoxy.py ne

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host: add Meson

2018-12-20 Thread Ross Burton
Meson is growing in popularity, so add it to the SDK packagegroup. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host.bb | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host.bb b/meta/reci

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] nativesdk-meson: add missing dependency on setuptools

2018-12-20 Thread Ross Burton
Meson uses pkg_resources, which is part of setuptools. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-devtools/meson/nativesdk-meson_0.49.0.bb | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/meson/nativesdk-meson_0.49.0.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/meso

Re: [OE-core] flto automake

2018-12-20 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 4:37 AM Burton, Ross wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 01:20, Khem Raj wrote: > > > That however leads to the question of should we just change the > > > defaults? Does anything break if we use gcc-ar instead of ar? > > > > Dont think that is a good idea in general since g

[OE-core] [PATCH] man-pages: use alternatives to resolve crypt.3 conflict

2018-12-20 Thread Mark Asselstine
From: mark asselstine To fix: Error: Transaction check error: file /usr/share/man/man3/crypt.3 conflicts between attempted installs of libcrypt-doc-4.4.1-r0.core2_64 and man-pages-4.16-r0.core2_64 This issue came about after commit 59be9254df9f [libxcrypt: Upgrade to 4.4.1 release].

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] oeqa/concurrencytest: fix for locating meta-selftest

2018-12-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 12:19 +, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 18:43 +0800, Robert Yang > wrote:bb.utils.mkdirhier(newbuilddir) > > This broke on our autobuilder: > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/56/builds/61 >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] [RFC] go.bbclass: install dependencies under $GOPATH instead of $GOROOT

2018-12-20 Thread Damien Riegel
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 07:53, Matt Madison wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 5:52 PM Damien Riegel wrote: > > > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 16:41, Matt Madison wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:51 AM Damien Riegel > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > To package a go application in Yocto, one

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libpam: reproducibility: Fix host umask leakage at patch-time

2018-12-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 18:40 +1300, Douglas Royds wrote: > The patch file pam-security-abstract-securetty-handling.patch creates > a new > file (tty_secure.c) at patch-time, so its permissions are subject to > the host > umask. This file is later copied into the -dbg package with no change > in > pe

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libpam: reproducibility: Fix host umask leakage at patch-time

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
Why is this libpam specific and not a general issue that the umask needs to be set in patch.bbclass? Ross On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 05:41, Douglas Royds wrote: > > The patch file pam-security-abstract-securetty-handling.patch creates a new > file (tty_secure.c) at patch-time, so its permissions are

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] glibc: Remove site_config and glibc-initial

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 11:59, wrote: > On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 11:50 +, Burton, Ross wrote: > > As the only users of siteconfig are now zlib and ncurses, should we > > just rip it out entirely leaving a gap for a fresh implementation? > > I'm cc'ing Mark who has a lot of the history on this. > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] [RFC] go.bbclass: install dependencies under $GOPATH instead of $GOROOT

2018-12-20 Thread Matt Madison
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 5:52 PM Damien Riegel wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 16:41, Matt Madison wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:51 AM Damien Riegel > > wrote: > > > > > > To package a go application in Yocto, one needs to also package its > > > dependencies to keep the build reprod

Re: [OE-core] flto automake

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 01:20, Khem Raj wrote: > > That however leads to the question of should we just change the > > defaults? Does anything break if we use gcc-ar instead of ar? > > Dont think that is a good idea in general since gcc-ar is a wrapper > around normal ar > passing --plugin=/path/to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] cmake-native: Set --parallel for configure

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 12:16, Burton, Ross wrote: > I see similar wins here, walltime for cmake-native's build goes from > five minutes to one minute. For anyone playing along at home, this is what I did: Cleaned tmp, applied patch to the mut branch. $ git checkout HEAD^; bitbake cmake-native -

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] oeqa/concurrencytest: fix for locating meta-selftest

2018-12-20 Thread richard . purdie
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 18:43 +0800, Robert Yang wrote: > > On 12/20/18 6:14 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 23:43 -0800, Robert Yang wrote: > > Sorry, but this change just swaps one problem for another. meta- > > selftest is part of OE-Core so its position relative to bitbake >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] cmake-native: Set --parallel for configure

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 06:46, Robert Yang wrote: > + --parallel="${@oe.utils.parallel_make_argument(d, '%d')}" \ Tweaked when merging to mut to be: + ${S}/configure --verbose --prefix=${prefix} \ + ${@oe.utils.parallel_make_argument(d, '--parallel=%d')} \ +

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] glibc: Remove site_config and glibc-initial

2018-12-20 Thread richard . purdie
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 11:50 +, Burton, Ross wrote: > As the only users of siteconfig are now zlib and ncurses, should we > just rip it out entirely leaving a gap for a fresh implementation? I'm cc'ing Mark who has a lot of the history on this. I think we're at a point where we likely need to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] glibc: Remove site_config and glibc-initial

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
As the only users of siteconfig are now zlib and ncurses, should we just rip it out entirely leaving a gap for a fresh implementation? Ross On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 00:16, Richard Purdie wrote: > > The only reason we appear to need glibc-initial at this time is to support > the site_config code. Th

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] create-pull-request: fix sed command for SUBJECT

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
So if I sent a patch with the subject "Fix #1234" it fails? Sounds like a good reason to rewrite create-pull-request in Python to avoid this nonsense. Ross On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 08:05, Robert Yang wrote: > > Fixed when SUBJECT contains slash(/): > sed: -e expression #1, char 35: unknown option

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libpng: Upgrade 1.6.35 -> 1.6.36

2018-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
This upgrade is already on the list. Ross On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 10:48, ricky.yoon wrote: > > License-Update: License file changes are due to updates in Version and > Copyright date > > Signed-off-by: ricky.yoon > --- > .../libpng/{libpng_1.6.35.bb => libpng_1.6.36.bb} | 8 >

[OE-core] [PATCH] libpng: Upgrade 1.6.35 -> 1.6.36

2018-12-20 Thread ricky.yoon
License-Update: License file changes are due to updates in Version and Copyright date Signed-off-by: ricky.yoon --- .../libpng/{libpng_1.6.35.bb => libpng_1.6.36.bb} | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-multimedia/libpng/{libpng_1.6.35.bb =>

[OE-core] [PATCH] libpng: Upgrade 1.6.35 -> 1.6.36

2018-12-20 Thread ricky.yoon
License-Update: License file changes are due to updates in Version and Copyright date (From OE-Core rev: dd46638acf5e8ad0af84cbaf5254918b42bb68ce) Change-Id: I42bda18b0e68626069795487a35a37a3e96a19c6 Signed-off-by: ricky.yoon --- .../libpng/{libpng_1.6.35.bb => libpng_1.6.36.bb} | 8 ++

[OE-core] [PATCH] libpng: Upgrade 1.6.35 -> 1.6.36

2018-12-20 Thread ricky.yoon
License-Update: License file changes are due to updates in Version and Copyright date (From OE-Core rev: dd46638acf5e8ad0af84cbaf5254918b42bb68ce) Change-Id: I42bda18b0e68626069795487a35a37a3e96a19c6 Signed-off-by: ricky.yoon --- .../libpng/{libpng_1.6.35.bb => libpng_1.6.36.bb} | 8 ++

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/4] gcc: Drop gcc-cross-initial and use gcc-cross instead

2018-12-20 Thread richard . purdie
On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 16:55 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 4:16 PM Richard Purdie > wrote: > > +# ifunc doesn't appear to work on mips, casuses libbfd assertion > > failures > > +CACHED_CONFIGUREVARS_append_mipsarch = " > > libc_cv_ld_gnu_indirect_function=no" > > perhaps we sho

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] oeqa/concurrencytest: fix for locating meta-selftest

2018-12-20 Thread Robert Yang
On 12/20/18 6:14 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 23:43 -0800, Robert Yang wrote: The previous code assumed builddir and meta-selftest are in the same dir, but this isn't always true, builddir can be anywhere, use bitbake to locate meta-selftest can fix the problem. The bb.fat

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] oeqa/concurrencytest: fix for locating meta-selftest

2018-12-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 23:43 -0800, Robert Yang wrote: > The previous code assumed builddir and meta-selftest are in the same > dir, but this isn't always true, builddir can be anywhere, use > bitbake to locate meta-selftest can fix the problem. > > The bb.fatal() doesn't work (no error message is

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] newlib: Move away from gcc-initial dependency

2018-12-20 Thread Alejandro Hernandez
On 12/19/2018 10:13 AM, Khem Raj wrote: gcc-initial step is no more needed Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-core/newlib/newlib.inc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/newlib/newlib.inc b/meta/recipes-core/newlib/newlib.inc index c97c

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] libpcap: upgrade 1.8.1 -> 1.9.0

2018-12-20 Thread Anuj Mittal
* For changes, see: https://www.tcpdump.org/libpcap-changes.txt * Merge inc and bb and remove unnecessary flags. * Remove all patches, they have either been upstreamed or fixed differently. * Compilation with bluez5 works just fine, enable it and remove bluez4 config. * Backport a commit to fix

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for "libsolv: upgrade 0.7.1 -> 0.7...." and 4 more

2018-12-20 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: "libsolv: upgrade 0.7.1 -> 0.7" and 4 more Revision: 1 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/15429/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been

[OE-core] [PATCH 5/5] libpcap: upgrade 1.8.1 -> 1.9.0

2018-12-20 Thread Anuj Mittal
* For changes, see: https://www.tcpdump.org/libpcap-changes.txt * Merge inc and bb and remove unnecessary flags. * Remove all patches, they have either been upstreamed or fixed differently. * Compilation with bluez5 works just fine, enable it and remove bluez4 config. * Backport a commit to fix

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] at-spi2-atk: upgrade 2.26.2 -> 2.30.0

2018-12-20 Thread Anuj Mittal
For changes, see: https://github.com/GNOME/at-spi2-atk/blob/AT_SPI2_ATK_2_30_0/NEWS Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal --- .../atk/{at-spi2-atk_2.26.2.bb => at-spi2-atk_2.30.0.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-support/atk/{at-spi2-atk_2.26.2.bb => a

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/5] atk: upgrade 2.28.1 -> 2.30.0

2018-12-20 Thread Anuj Mittal
* For changes, see: https://github.com/GNOME/atk/blob/ATK_2_30_0/NEWS * Change in doc and introspection switches and patch refresh. Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal --- ...ld-enable-introspection-for-cross-compile.patch | 14 +++--- .../atk/{atk_2.28.1.bb => atk_2.30.0.bb} | 12

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] libsolv: upgrade 0.7.1 -> 0.7.2

2018-12-20 Thread Anuj Mittal
>From NEWS: - bug fixes: * do not autouninstall packages because of forcebest updates - new features: * support rpm's new '^' version separator * support set/get_considered_list in bindings * new experimental SOLVER_FLAG_ONLY_NAMESPACE_RECOMMENDED flag Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal --- ...

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] libjpeg-turbo: upgrade 2.0.0 -> 2.0.1

2018-12-20 Thread Anuj Mittal
* For changes, see: https://github.com/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo/blob/master/ChangeLog.md * Removed upstreamed patch Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal --- ...1-libjpeg-turbo-fix-package_qa-error.patch | 18 +-- ...x-wrongly-defined-define-HAVE_STDLIB.patch | 119 -- ...-turbo_2.0.0.

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] create-pull-request: fix sed command for SUBJECT

2018-12-20 Thread Robert Yang
The following changes since commit 14c291e1fb6324da46885b69fbd7f01b3c6b053e: gcc-runtime: Add missing libc dependency (2018-12-18 16:19:30 +) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib rbt/cpr http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-c

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] create-pull-request: fix sed command for SUBJECT

2018-12-20 Thread Robert Yang
Fixed when SUBJECT contains slash(/): sed: -e expression #1, char 35: unknown option to `s' Use '#' as separator to fix the problem. Signed-off-by: Robert Yang --- scripts/create-pull-request | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/scripts/create-pull-request b/scrip