Hi,
what is the current status of the usrmerge patch [1]? It was submitted
quite a long time ago and I can't find any discussion about it. If there
is something I can do to help with testing/tweaking to get it merged
please let me know.
Thanks,
Anton Gerasimov
[1] https://patchwork.openembedded.
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 01:42:06 -0700
akuster808 wrote:
> On 03/17/2017 06:21 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> > On 2017-03-18 00:55, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've got a pre-alpha 'distro' and some layers I think that could
> >> get to an interesting state. The intent is to work the
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 01:42:06 -0700
akuster808 wrote:
> On 03/17/2017 06:21 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> > On 2017-03-18 00:55, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've got a pre-alpha 'distro' and some layers I think that could
> >> get to an interesting state. The intent is to work the
Having changes the sdk test to cpio from cvs, we no longer require an
editor to be present. This patch removes vi from the list of required
tools.
Signed-off-by: brian avery
---
meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/me
We currently fetch,configure,build, and install cvs as our test for the
sdk. cvs unfortunately, requires a default editor in order to run. The
change in 94790a8254d6 that checks to see if you have something like vi
installed is fragile since you may have a different default editor. This
patch swi
We were using cvs as our sdk test by running configure,make, and install using
the sdk. Unfortunately, cvs requires vi and we were therefore requiring vi as
one of our HOSTTOOLS. Since this is a choice among many for editors, it makes
for a fragile requirement. Furthermore, a build container wo
We were using cvs as our sdk test by running configure,make, and install using
the sdk. Unfortunately, cvs requires vi and we were therefore requiring vi as
one of our HOSTTOOLS. Since this is a choice among many for editors, it makes
for a fragile requirement. Furthermore, a build container wo
On 03/17/2017 06:21 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2017-03-18 00:55, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a pre-alpha 'distro' and some layers I think that could get to
an interesting state. The intent is to work them up to where they are
suitable to be submitted as patches to oe-core rather
