Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][V3 5/5] subversion: add explicit dependency on file-replacement-native for native builds

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Ross Burton wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/subversion/subversion_1.8.13.bb | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/subversion/subversion_1.8.13.bb > b/meta/recipes-devtools/subversion/subv

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] python3-pygobject: Upgrade from 3.18.2 to 3.20.1

Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez --- .../python/python3-pygobject_3.18.2.bb | 25 -- .../python/python3-pygobject_3.20.1.bb | 25 ++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/pytho

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 7/9] python3-pygobject: Upgrade from 3.18.2 to 3.21.0

On 06/08/2016 03:38 AM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: On 8 June 2016 at 08:56, Alejandro Hernandez > wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez > > --- > .../{python3-pygobject_3.18.2.bb

[OE-core] Extensible SDK questions

Hello, I noticed that the Extensible SDK Host Toolchain (in my case /tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin) does not contain a cross gdb variant. Is this how it is supposed to be? Also, how can I add it? Best regards, Matei Valeanu Software developer Enea Linux Email matei.vale...@enea.com Phone +

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/3] ipk/deb/rpm: add kernel version to its dependencies

On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 19:08 +0300, Ovidiu-Adrian Vancea wrote: > Updating the kernel (for all package managers) does not update the > dependencies > (eg. modules) because there is no possibility to do version > enforcement in the > OE recipe. Upon rebooting, the older version modules do not load an

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] smartpm: Don't ignore error if RPM transaction fails without problems

On 6/8/16 11:17 AM, Herve Jourdain wrote: > Hi Mark, > > In my case, the issue was due to an empty problem list, which after Daniel's > fix did trigger a retry, which failed because the packages were already > installed. > But the code for a non-empty problem list does also trigger a retry, and

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] smartpm: Don't ignore error if RPM transaction fails without problems

Hi Mark, In my case, the issue was due to an empty problem list, which after Daniel's fix did trigger a retry, which failed because the packages were already installed. But the code for a non-empty problem list does also trigger a retry, and I suppose it would run also in the same "package alre

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 3/3] package_rpm.bbclass: add kernel version to its dependencies

Use the kernel package Version field for its rdepends, rrecommends, and rsuggests fields’ values. This makes the packages on which the kernel depends be the same version as the kernel. The idea is the same as for .deb and .ipk pkgs but the implementation is slightly different because there are no

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/3] package_deb.bbclass: add kernel version to its dependencies

Use the kernel package Version field for its rdepends, rrecommends, and rsuggests fields’ values. This makes the packages on which the kernel depends be the same version as the kernel. The .deb pkgs behaviour is very similar to .ipk's, and the implementation is identical for this change. Signed-o

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/3] package_ipk.bbclass: add kernel version to its dependencies

Use the kernel package Version field for its rdepends, rrecommends, and rsuggests fields’ values. This makes the packages on which the kernel depends be the same version as the kernel. Signed-off-by: Ovidiu-Adrian Vancea --- meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 inser

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/3] ipk/deb/rpm: add kernel version to its dependencies

Updating the kernel (for all package managers) does not update the dependencies (eg. modules) because there is no possibility to do version enforcement in the OE recipe. Upon rebooting, the older version modules do not load and can leave hardware in a non-functioning state (if their drivers are not

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] smartpm: Don't ignore error if RPM transaction fails without problems

On 6/8/16 10:43 AM, Klauer, Daniel wrote: > Hello, > >> You also need to add another check just before raising the error, or you >> would end up getting an "unknown error" raised there. >> I basically replaced: >> -if (probs is not None) and (not retry): >> + if (probs is not None) a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] smartpm: Don't ignore error if RPM transaction fails without problems

Hi Daniel, OK, I'll send what I've done to fix this for me tomorrow - it's basically what we have discussed here, modification of 2 lines. Regarding the possibility that the whole scheme might fail because of "package already installed" during a retry, I won't try anything yet, because I'd like t

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] smartpm: Don't ignore error if RPM transaction fails without problems

Hello, > You also need to add another check just before raising the error, or you > would end up getting an "unknown error" raised there. > I basically replaced: > -if (probs is not None) and (not retry): > + if (probs is not None) and ((len(probs) != 0) or not > sysconf.has("attempt

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] oe-pkgdata-util: new option to provide full info for binary package(s)

From: "Alexander D. Kanevskiy" New option can be used for displaying full information about binary package(s), including name, full version, recipe name, recipe full version and package size. This information can be useful inside custom buildhistory class to produce detailed image manifest for f

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v1] unzip: fix security issues

On 7 June 2016 at 22:49, Plauchu Edwin < edwin.plauchu.cama...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Ping! > This is merged already: Author: Edwin Plauchu AuthorDate: Fri May 27 15:29:21 2016 -0500 Commit: Richard Purdie CommitDate: Wed Jun 1 12:38:43 2016 +0100 unzip: fix security issues Ro

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] smartpm: Don't ignore error if RPM transaction fails without problems

Hi, Yes, that's what I'm seeing... And setting the check with (len(probs)!=0) in case of retry makes it go away (I tested that exact same thing yesterday), provided another small modification is added. You also need to add another check just before raising the error, or you would end up getting an

[OE-core] [PATCH] libjpeg-turbo: update to 1.5.0

1. LIC_FILES_CHKSUM updates only involves changes in Copyright holders. LICENSE remains the same. 2. libjpeg-turbo don't have non-floating point ABI support in MIPS. Provide a work around for that. [YOCTO #9606] Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John --- ...{libjpeg-turbo_8d+1.4.2.bb => libjpeg-tu

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] smartpm: Don't ignore error if RPM transaction fails without problems

Hello, I don't know the details of the attempt-install feature, but it looks like my patch did change the retry behaviour, due to this change in smart/backends/rpm/pm.py (in smart-attempt.patch): -if probs and sysconf.has("attempt-install", soft=True): +if (probs is not N

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] qemu-native: set ld.bfd, fix cflags, and set some environment vars

On 8 June 2016 at 01:00, Stephen Arnold wrote: > meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc | 13 +++-- > meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/qemu-2.5.0-cflags.patch | 13 + > meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu_2.5.0.bb| 1 + > qemu was upgraded to 2.6.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] oe-pkgdata-util: new option to provide full info for binary package(s)

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Paul Eggleton < paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Hi Sasha, > > Functionality wise this looks good. > > On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:44:29 Alexander D. Kanevskiy wrote: > > New option can be used for displaying full information about binary > > package(s), includin

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 7/9] python3-pygobject: Upgrade from 3.18.2 to 3.21.0

On 8 June 2016 at 08:56, Alejandro Hernandez < alejandro.hernan...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez > --- > .../{python3-pygobject_3.18.2.bb => python3-pygobject_3.21.0.bb} | 4 ++-- I think python3-pygobject follows the "minor-even-is-stable" release numbering