[OE-core] [PATCH] dmidecode: add powerpc64 to compatible host

2015-01-23 Thread jackie.huang
From: Jackie Huang Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang --- meta/recipes-devtools/dmidecode/dmidecode_2.12.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/dmidecode/dmidecode_2.12.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/dmidecode/dmidecode_2.12.bb index 3e3a350..b5151b8

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] u-boot: update to version 2015.01

2015-01-23 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
From: Denys Dmytriyenko Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko --- v2 - rebase on top of fw-utils combining patch from Otavio .../0001-tools-env-fix-build-error.patch | 36 ++ ...utils_2014.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2015.01.bb} | 21 +++-- ...kimage_2014.07.bb =>

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arch-mips.inc: Change definition of TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH

2015-01-23 Thread Mark Hatle
Note, I tested this by building a world build for MACHINE qemumips64 with DEFAULTTUNE set to mips64-n32. It and the other recent patches I've sent are available at git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib mhatle/oe-core --Mark On 1/23/15 3:20 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > [YOCTO #7230] > > In certain

[OE-core] [PATCH] arch-mips.inc: Change definition of TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH

2015-01-23 Thread Mark Hatle
[YOCTO #7230] In certain system configurations TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH will not expand in the right order for gcc-cross-candian-mips64n32 to be generated properly. This will cause SDKs to fail to generate properly. Changing the global definition of TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH always expands the ABIEXT

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot-fw-utils: Fix the cross build

2015-01-23 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:55:07PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:18:27PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > This merges the u-boot-fw-utils-cross into the main u-boot-fw-utils > > recipe and fixes the build failure seen since 2014.07 update. > > So, the actual fix is

Re: [OE-core] [OE-Core][PATCH] gcc-sanitizers: fix licensing

2015-01-23 Thread Dan McGregor
On 23 January 2015 at 13:05, Dan McGregor wrote: > From: Dan McGregor > > The sanitizer runtime library is dual-licensed under the NCSA > and MIT licenses. > > Also make nativesdk-gcc-sanitizers use SDKGCCVERSION by default > instead of GCCVERSION > > Signed-off-by: Dan McGregor > --- > meta/co

[OE-core] [OE-Core][PATCH] gcc-sanitizers: fix licensing

2015-01-23 Thread Dan McGregor
From: Dan McGregor The sanitizer runtime library is dual-licensed under the NCSA and MIT licenses. Also make nativesdk-gcc-sanitizers use SDKGCCVERSION by default instead of GCCVERSION Signed-off-by: Dan McGregor --- meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc | 2 +- meta/recipes-devtools/g

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] About GPLv2's native recipe

2015-01-23 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 23 January 2015 09:04:28 akuster808 wrote: > On 01/23/2015 04:47 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Robert Yang wrote: > >> We have several GPLv2 recipes such as m4-native_1.4.9.bb, while we also > >> have GPLv3's m4-native_1.4.17.bb, I think that we can re

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] About GPLv2's native recipe

2015-01-23 Thread akuster808
On 01/23/2015 04:47 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Robert Yang wrote: We have several GPLv2 recipes such as m4-native_1.4.9.bb, while we also have GPLv3's m4-native_1.4.17.bb, I think that we can remove m4-native_1.4.9.bb if the target m4_1.4.9.bb builds well ?

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] About GPLv2's native recipe

2015-01-23 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Christopher Larson wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Otavio Salvador > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Robert Yang >> wrote: >> > We have several GPLv2 recipes such as m4-native_1.4.9.bb, while we also >> > have GPLv3's m4-native_1.4.17.b

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] About GPLv2's native recipe

2015-01-23 Thread Christopher Larson
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Robert Yang > wrote: > > We have several GPLv2 recipes such as m4-native_1.4.9.bb, while we also > > have GPLv3's m4-native_1.4.17.bb, I think that we can remove > > m4-native_1.4.9.bb if the target m4_1.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] qt4-x11-free: Fix Qt4 to build without opengl

2015-01-23 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Fabien, On Thursday 22 January 2015 15:08:35 Fabien Proriol wrote: > --- > meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free.inc | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free.inc > b/meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free.inc index 3b1e0fe..d1b88ea 10064

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc-use-option-groups.patch: Various fixups

2015-01-23 Thread Burton, Ross
On 22 January 2015 at 22:02, Peter Seebach wrote: > > ping. > > My memory (which is notoriously unreliable) was that we'd merged these > changes, but it may be we did thim in our local tree. > Yeah they're not in master - I think I merged and then backed them out locally to bisect some breakage.

[OE-core] [master][dizzy][PATCH 0/2] swig + pcre-config

2015-01-23 Thread Patrick Ohly
The reason for the patch series is the observation that swig from meta-openembedded requires pcre-config to be installed on the host system, even though it does not actually get used. While that can be fixed in the swig recipe, investigating the situation led to the conclusion that the current han

[OE-core] [master][dizzy][PATCH 2/2] binconfig-disabled: install config scripts in sysroot

2015-01-23 Thread Patrick Ohly
The purpose of binconfig-disabled is to manipulate config scripts such that using them causes errors. But that only works when the modified config script really gets installed in the sysroot. That is not the case with the staging code in binconfig.bbclass. Only patched config files get staged. For

[OE-core] [master][dizzy][PATCH 1/2] binconfig-disabled: try harder to prevent usage of config scripts

2015-01-23 Thread Patrick Ohly
Returning a non-zero exit code is not enough to cause errors when configure scripts call the patched config scripts: for example, swig's configure script uses PCRE_LIBS=`$PCRE_CONFIG --libs` and does not abort on errors. Using empty output may then succeed, for example when the required library is

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] About GPLv2's native recipe

2015-01-23 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Robert Yang wrote: > We have several GPLv2 recipes such as m4-native_1.4.9.bb, while we also > have GPLv3's m4-native_1.4.17.bb, I think that we can remove > m4-native_1.4.9.bb if the target m4_1.4.9.bb builds well ? > > I'd like to remove it because we don't buil

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 3/4] xorg-driver: add x11 to required DISTRO_FEATURES

2015-01-23 Thread Burton, Ross
On 22 January 2015 at 16:34, Martin Jansa wrote: > and the .inc file is used in much more recipes (which don't need libx11 to > build) > You can't be arguing that it's alright to build the X11 drivers when the X11 distro feature is disabled? I thought the end goal was to cover all X11 recipes,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] pseudo_1.6.x.bb/pseudo_git.bb: Pseudo 1.6.4

2015-01-23 Thread Burton, Ross
On 23 January 2015 at 02:23, Peter Seebach wrote: > pseudo 1.6.4 fixes a silly configure bug introduced with > 1.6.3. > Thanks for the quick fix Peter :) Ross -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] Add XFCE image build bb file

2015-01-23 Thread Yong Li
Thanks Ross, I will send this patch to meta-xfce later 2015-01-23 18:48 GMT+08:00 Burton, Ross : > > On 23 January 2015 at 07:55, Yong Li wrote: > >> meta/recipes-graphics/images/core-image-xfce.bb | 16 >> > > This doesn't belong in oe-core, add it to meta-xfce instead. > > Ros

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] Add XFCE image build bb file

2015-01-23 Thread Burton, Ross
On 23 January 2015 at 07:55, Yong Li wrote: > meta/recipes-graphics/images/core-image-xfce.bb | 16 > This doesn't belong in oe-core, add it to meta-xfce instead. Ross -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.ope