On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Stanacar, StefanX
wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 18:08 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Stefan Stanacar
>> wrote:
>
>> > +# test rootfs + kernel
>> > +self.rootfs = os.path.join(d.getVar("DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE", True),
On 21 March 2014 18:22, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Paul Barker wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> musl-libc hit version 1.0.0 yesterday and is starting to look good to
>> me. It's basically a really small but very functional libc that would
>> suit embedded environments very well as
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Paul Barker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> musl-libc hit version 1.0.0 yesterday and is starting to look good to
> me. It's basically a really small but very functional libc that would
> suit embedded environments very well as an alternative to
> eglibc/uclibc. I'm personall
The GTK+ engine schemas are not insignicant in size but also mostly useless.
Put them in a sub-package instead of PN so they only get installed when
explicitly required.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
---
meta/recipes-gnome/gtk-engines/gtk-engines_2.20.2.bb |3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+
This was accidently left in and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
---
meta/recipes-gnome/gtk-engines/gtk-engines_2.20.2.bb |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk-engines/gtk-engines_2.20.2.bb
b/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk-engines/gtk-en
Since we now run depmod when building images (as the postinst that does
this is now on kernel-base instead of kernel-image) it is possible to
have this file different between the two halves of the multilib image,
and the code that checks for such differences detects this and fails.
Whitelist this f
Since kernel-base is the package that contains the files that depmod
needs to run, we should be running depmod from the kernel-base
postinstall rather than kernel-image.
Fixes [YOCTO #5392].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+
The other fixes from "Misc fixes" branch were merged; this one needed
an additional fix for the multilib changed file detection, which has
been added in v3.
The following changes since commit ef2ba0a17a4fbd0e0c43c144f43d1d40de23697e:
gtk-engines: removed gnome inheritance (2014-03-21 17:14:53
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 13:05 -0300, João Henrique Ferreira de Freitas
wrote:
> The special case when wic is set up to use SD/MMC-Cards in place
> of sdX disks is not handled properly.
>
> Append 'p' to the rootdev when disk is SD/MMC-Cards fix this situation.
This is missing your Signed-off-by. O
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 3/21/14, 7:10 AM, Mats Kärrman wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On: Thursday, March 13, 2014 11:36 AM, Mats Kärrman wrote:
>>>
>>> My "home made" hard float tune for PowerPC looks like this:
>>>
>>> -
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 23:03 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2014 01:45 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > On 11 March 2014 17:08, Robert Yang wrote:
> >> Robert Yang (6):
> >>classes/archive*.bbclass: remove archive-*-source.bbclass
> >>archiver.bbclass: refactor it
> >>package_rpm.bb
On 3/21/14, 7:10 AM, Mats Kärrman wrote:
Hi,
On: Thursday, March 13, 2014 11:36 AM, Mats Kärrman wrote:
My "home made" hard float tune for PowerPC looks like this:
--
# Tune for the e300c3 core
require conf/machine/include/tune-pp
If you want passwordless logins to work with pam enabled, then you can't
have "nullok_secure" enabled on pam_unix entries. Add some
postprocessing to change these to "nullok" when debug-tweaks is in
IMAGE_FEATURES, in order to make passwordless logins with PAM work
again.
Fixes [YOCTO #5973].
Sig
The following change since commit eb53ae4a5702dbd65b6e340bbd3ae4566157c081:
gnome-doc-utils: removed gconf inheritance (2014-03-21 12:05:33 +)
is available in the git repository at:
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib paule/pam-nullok
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit
On Sat, 2014-03-15 at 18:17 -0300, João Henrique Ferreira de Freitas
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These patchs allows the user create the following directdisk-multi-rootfs.wks
> file:
>
> part /boot --source bootimg-pcbios --ondisk sda --fstype=msdos \
> --label boot --active --align 1024
> part /
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 01:59:15PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > On 20 March 2014 19:01, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> >> This init script is adding support for sysv and no more. This is also
> >> indicated in the first line of the commit message. I a
On 21 March 2014 13:10, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 21 March 2014 12:34, Paul Barker wrote:
>> I'm currently very busy between various projects so I don't have time
>> to hack together a musl-libc recipe myself but I should have time to
>> help test it.
>
> I saw that yesterday too and thought it co
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 20 March 2014 19:01, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> This init script is adding support for sysv and no more. This is also
>> indicated in the first line of the commit message. I am sorry, but I
>> will not test it systemd and with other systems
>
>
>
>
> I saw that yesterday too and thought it could be interesting for
> Yocto. I'm curious as to why it's better than uclibc though
> (genuinely curious, I know little about uclibc beyond "it's smaller").
>
It been a while since I've reviewed uclibc, but doesn't it break a lot of
software with i
On 21 March 2014 12:34, Paul Barker wrote:
> I'm currently very busy between various projects so I don't have time
> to hack together a musl-libc recipe myself but I should have time to
> help test it.
I saw that yesterday too and thought it could be interesting for
Yocto. I'm curious as to why
Hi all,
musl-libc hit version 1.0.0 yesterday and is starting to look good to
me. It's basically a really small but very functional libc that would
suit embedded environments very well as an alternative to
eglibc/uclibc. I'm personally very interested in using it in my
projects and I also think it
Hi,
On: Thursday, March 13, 2014 11:36 AM, Mats Kärrman wrote:
> My "home made" hard float tune for PowerPC looks like this:
>
> --
> # Tune for the e300c3 core
> require conf/machine/include/tune-ppce300c3.inc
>
> # Use hardware fl
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 15:15 +, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Since kernel-base is the package that contains the files that depmod
> needs to run, we should be running depmod from the kernel-base
> postinstall rather than kernel-image.
>
> Fixes [YOCTO #5392].
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
> ---
Hi Otavio,
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 18:08 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Stefan Stanacar
> wrote:
> > +# test rootfs + kernel
> > +self.rootfs = os.path.join(d.getVar("DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE", True),
> > d.getVar("IMAGE_LINK_NAME", True) + '.tar.gz')
>
to define UBOOT_ARCH, we map kernel architectures to U-Boot architectures.
In the case of arm64 kernel, we should map to arm U-boot architecture.
This patch add the exception rule to the map_uboot_arch function.
Signed-off-by: Fathi Boudra
---
meta/classes/kernel-arch.bbclass | 1 +
1 file chan
25 matches
Mail list logo
