[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1][master] Fix for Bug 5403

2013-12-31 Thread Tom Zanussi
This fixes a problem seen when accessing function params in systemtap on certain platforms, due to flaky debuginfo. Tested on the following machines with various systemtap scripts: qemuppc qemuarm qemux86 qemux86-64 crownbay nuc The following changes since commit 005af45191ded6185c618c708181b312

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] systemtap: Add --enable-prologues to configuration

2013-12-31 Thread Tom Zanussi
In some cases, the debuginfo generated by the compiler is insufficient for systemtap to figure out function param locations; using -P allows it to use prologue searching to find the correct locations. Enable prologue searching in the configuration so the user doesn't have to specify it manually.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1][dora] - Fix for Bug 5403

2013-12-31 Thread Saul Wold
On 12/30/2013 09:54 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: Hi Robert, Yes, I'm still testing the one for master - will post tomorrow. Right, we should have the master patch backported into dora hopefully the changes will be the same. Sau! Tom On Tue, 2013-12-31 at 09:29 +0800, Robert Yang wrote: Hi Tom

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] lib/oe/patch.py: Prefer "git am" over "git apply" when applying git patches

2013-12-31 Thread Laszlo Papp
Ping? Alternatively, the system could also have an option for further fine-tuning what to do with git patches On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote: > It is better to use "git am" when possible to preserve the commit messages and > the mail format in general for patches when those

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Adding irssi 0.8.16-rc1 recipe

2013-12-31 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 27 dec. 2013, om 18:30 heeft krzysztof.m.syw...@intel.com het volgende geschreven: > From: Krzysztof Sywula > > --- > meta/recipes-connectivity/irssi/irssi_0.8.16-rc1.bb | 11 +++ that should be 0.8.15+0.8.16-rc1 to conform to the versioning policy __

Re: [OE-core] Why do we allow empty -dev/-dbg packages ?

2013-12-31 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 09:49:21AM +0800, ChenQi wrote: > Hi All, > > This might be a dummy question, but it has been puzzling me for some > time. So if someone could give me some explanation, that would be really > appreciated. > > In bitbake.conf, we have: > ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}-dev = "1" > ALLO