Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] bootimg: Scope HDDDIR and ISODIR variables to avoid conflicts

2013-05-02 Thread Jonathan Liu
I guess it is enough to scope just the variables in boot-directdisk for now then. Regards, Jonathan On 03/05/2013, at 8:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 05/02/2013 01:56 PM, Jonathan Liu wrote: >> These variables should not be shared with other image classes. >> The boot-directdisk class also has a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] bootimg: Scope HDDDIR and ISODIR variables to avoid conflicts

2013-05-02 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/02/2013 01:56 PM, Jonathan Liu wrote: These variables should not be shared with other image classes. The boot-directdisk class also has an HDDDIR variable that could be overwritten if executing concurrently in the same image recipe. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu --- meta/classes/bootimg.b

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] bootimg: Scope HDDDIR and ISODIR variables to avoid conflicts

2013-05-02 Thread Jonathan Liu
These variables should not be shared with other image classes. The boot-directdisk class also has an HDDDIR variable that could be overwritten if executing concurrently in the same image recipe. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu --- meta/classes/bootimg.bbclass | 25 + 1 file c

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] boot-directdisk: Scope HDDDIR and HDDIMG variables to avoid conflicts

2013-05-02 Thread Jonathan Liu
These variables should not be shared with other image classes. The bootimg class also has an HDDDIR variable that could be overwritten if executing concurrently in the same image recipe. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu --- meta/classes/boot-directdisk.bbclass | 25 - 1 file c

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Scope variables in image classes to avoid conflicts

2013-05-02 Thread Jonathan Liu
Note: This depends on syslinux update to 4.06. Jonathan Liu (2): boot-directdisk: Scope HDDDIR and HDDIMG variables to avoid conflicts bootimg: Scope HDDDIR and ISODIR variables to avoid conflicts meta/classes/boot-directdisk.bbclass | 25 - meta/classes/bootimg.bbcla

[OE-core] [PATCH v3] guile: Update to 2.0.9

2013-05-02 Thread Jonathan Liu
fix_parallel_build_issue.patch is now part of upstream. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu --- .../guile/files/fix_parallel_build_issue.patch | 20 meta/recipes-devtools/guile/guile_2.0.7.bb | 103 - meta/recipes-devtools/guile/guile_2.0.9.bb | 102

Re: [OE-core] [oe] State of bitbake world

2013-05-02 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > See: > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2013-April/045090.html Ah yes... openembedded-devel... that magic list to which I can't seem to subscribe myself ;-) ___ Openembedded-c

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] guile: Update to 2.0.9

2013-05-02 Thread Saul Wold
On 04/29/2013 03:52 AM, Jonathan Liu wrote: fix_parallel_build_issue.patch is now part of upstream. There was a problem with this patch, maybe due the attachment, can you please resend without the attachment. Thanks Sau! Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu --- .../guile/files/fix_paralle

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH/v2 3/3] core-image-sato: add udev-extraconf

2013-05-02 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/02/2013 09:52 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 12:31 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 04/30/2013 05:30 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: as discussed in [1-2] [1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-April/039025.html [2] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/ope

Re: [OE-core] libexecdir and multilib

2013-05-02 Thread Mark Hatle
On 5/2/13 12:24 PM, Enrico Scholz wrote: "Burton, Ross" writes: rpm allows "executables" (but not libraries) to conflict and will prefer the 64-bit version, Sure? At least rpm-4 (Fedora, RHEL) does not allow files to conflict. Fedora solves the multilib problem by splitting the distribution

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image.bbclass: Don't mark do_rootfs and do_build as nostamp

2013-05-02 Thread Saul Wold
On 04/29/2013 11:33 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:54 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:45 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: Given that this is a departure from previously established behaviour, I do think we need to give a more of an explanation in the commit m

Re: [OE-core] libexecdir and multilib

2013-05-02 Thread Enrico Scholz
"Burton, Ross" writes: > rpm allows "executables" (but not libraries) to conflict and will > prefer the 64-bit version, Sure? At least rpm-4 (Fedora, RHEL) does not allow files to conflict. Fedora solves the multilib problem by splitting the distribution into main packages (unilib only; contain

Re: [OE-core] [oe] State of bitbake world

2013-05-02 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:30:59PM -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Paul Barker wrote: > > The recipe also has dependencies > > outside meta-oe (fluidsynth in meta-multimedia IIRC) but that's a > > separate issue. > > I've noticed that too. Shouldn't dependencies be

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Andreas Müller
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> [andreas@oe-core]$ bitbake -e gdm | grep ^PSEUDO_PASSWD >>> PSEUDO_PASSWD="/home/andreas/tmp/oe-core-eglibc/sysroots/overo" >> >> >> Check that path contains 'etc/passwd' and 'etc/group'.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH/v2 3/3] core-image-sato: add udev-extraconf

2013-05-02 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 12:31 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > On 04/30/2013 05:30 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: > > as discussed in [1-2] > > > > [1] > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-April/039025.html > > [2] > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-April

Re: [OE-core] libexecdir and multilib

2013-05-02 Thread Mark Hatle
On 5/2/13 11:10 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: Hi all, There were several issues being discussed here under the topic of libexecdir, some simple and some less so. I'll ramble for a bit to try and get a proper conclusion debated. The situation where you have a 32-bit dropbear but a 64-bit openssh is r

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/3] neard: Use SRCREV instead of SRCPV

2013-05-02 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 05:11:28PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 2 May 2013 16:39, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> -PV = "0.10+git${SRCPV}" > >> +PV = "0.10+git${SRCREV}" > > As the git revision is the 0.10 tag, wouldn't it be clearer to not set > PV as the git revision is a detail of the fetcher - th

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Andreas Müller
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 5/2/13 10:31 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Andreas Müller >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Mark Hatle >>> wrote: On 5/2/13 9:55 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: > > > On Thu,

Re: [OE-core] [oe] State of bitbake world

2013-05-02 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Paul Barker wrote: > The recipe also has dependencies > outside meta-oe (fluidsynth in meta-multimedia IIRC) but that's a > separate issue. I've noticed that too. Shouldn't dependencies be contained within the same layer? Is it normal from these dependencies to be

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/3] neard: Use SRCREV instead of SRCPV

2013-05-02 Thread Burton, Ross
On 2 May 2013 16:39, Martin Jansa wrote: >> -PV = "0.10+git${SRCPV}" >> +PV = "0.10+git${SRCREV}" As the git revision is the 0.10 tag, wouldn't it be clearer to not set PV as the git revision is a detail of the fetcher - this *is* 0.10. Ross ___ Opene

[OE-core] libexecdir and multilib

2013-05-02 Thread Burton, Ross
Hi all, There were several issues being discussed here under the topic of libexecdir, some simple and some less so. I'll ramble for a bit to try and get a proper conclusion debated. The situation where you have a 32-bit dropbear but a 64-bit openssh is rather pathological and I'd like to know if

Re: [OE-core] [oe] State of bitbake world

2013-05-02 Thread Paul Barker
On 2 May 2013 16:18, Martin Jansa wrote: > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/vlc/vlc_1.1.11.bb, do_package I did have a potential fix for this, I'll take another look and see what I can do about sending a patch. The recipe also has dependencies outside meta-oe (fluidsynth in meta-mul

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Mark Hatle
On 5/2/13 10:31 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: On 5/2/13 9:55 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: On 5/2/13 9:34 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thurs

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Mark Hatle
On 5/2/13 10:18 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: On 5/2/13 9:55 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: On 5/2/13 9:34 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 02 May 2013 08:35:55 Mark Hatle wrote: On 5/2/13

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/3] neard: Use SRCREV instead of SRCPV

2013-05-02 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 05:56:32PM +0300, Jukka Rissanen wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen > --- > meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.10.bb | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.10.bb > b/meta/recipes-connec

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] mesa-demos: Use PACKAGECONFIG to enable/disable features

2013-05-02 Thread Burton, Ross
On 2 May 2013 16:28, Otavio Salvador wrote: > This allow selection of following features: > > drm, egl, freetype2, gbm, gles1, gles2, glut, osmesa, vg, wayland, x11 > > The x11 features is enabled depending on distro features but the > wayland has not been enabled as it does not work with Wayland

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Andreas Müller
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: >> On 5/2/13 9:55 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mark Hatle >>> wrote: On 5/2/13 9:34 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > On Thursday 02 M

[OE-core] [PATCH] mesa-demos: Use PACKAGECONFIG to enable/disable features

2013-05-02 Thread Otavio Salvador
This allow selection of following features: drm, egl, freetype2, gbm, gles1, gles2, glut, osmesa, vg, wayland, x11 The x11 features is enabled depending on distro features but the wayland has not been enabled as it does not work with Wayland 1.0. Rest were enabled for a sane default. Signed-off

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world

2013-05-02 Thread Andreas Müller
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:54:00PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> Updated status, but only change IIRC is fixed php, tbb, >> android-audiosystem and partially fixed llvm2.9 (I'm testing patch to >> fix build on qemuarm again) >> >> qemuarm Summa

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world

2013-05-02 Thread Martin Jansa
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:54:00PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > Updated status, but only change IIRC is fixed php, tbb, > android-audiosystem and partially fixed llvm2.9 (I'm testing patch to > fix build on qemuarm again) > > qemuarm Summary: 19 tasks failed: > http://logs.nslu2-linux.org/buildlog

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Andreas Müller
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 5/2/13 9:55 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mark Hatle >> wrote: >>> >>> On 5/2/13 9:34 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 02 May 2013 08:35:55 Mark Hatle wrote: > > > On 5/2/13 2:4

Re: [OE-core] systemd: /run directory not created

2013-05-02 Thread Jonathan Liu
On 23/02/2013 1:50 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote: On 22/02/13 14:15, Jack Mitchell wrote: On 22/02/13 09:22, Jack Mitchell wrote: On 21/02/13 22:27, Khem Raj wrote: On (14/02/13 15:44), Jack Mitchell wrote: On 14/02/13 15:31, Burton, Ross wrote: On 14 February 2013 14:31, Jack Mitchell wrote: Did

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Mark Hatle
On 5/2/13 9:55 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: On 5/2/13 9:34 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 02 May 2013 08:35:55 Mark Hatle wrote: On 5/2/13 2:49 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: on one of my build machines useradd.bbclass seem to use the UID/GI

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 09:50 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 5/2/13 9:34 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Thursday 02 May 2013 08:35:55 Mark Hatle wrote: > >> On 5/2/13 2:49 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: > >>> on one of my build machines useradd.bbclass seem to use the UID/GID of > >>> build host. On other

Re: [OE-core] systemd: /run directory not created

2013-05-02 Thread Jonathan Liu
On 15/04/2013 11:45 PM, Jack Mitchell wrote: On 15/04/13 14:10, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 01:58:52PM +0100, Jack Mitchell wrote: Ok, I have just come back to trying out the new systemd implementation, and this bug still exists. Exactly the same error as before: [2.390730

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 3/3] neard: Split recipe to two parts

2013-05-02 Thread Jukka Rissanen
This way it is easier to override settings if needed. Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen --- meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard.inc | 59 ++ meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.10.bb | 60 +-- 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/3] neard: Rename the recipe as we are already in 0.10

2013-05-02 Thread Jukka Rissanen
Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen --- meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.10.bb | 69 +++ meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.9.bb | 69 --- 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-connectivity/neard

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/3] neard: Use SRCREV instead of SRCPV

2013-05-02 Thread Jukka Rissanen
Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen --- meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.10.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.10.bb b/meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.10.bb index dc43f7e..b9198af 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-conn

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/3] neard fixes

2013-05-02 Thread Jukka Rissanen
Hi, there was too many unrelated changes in my earlier patch so this one splits it more. Cheers, Jukka Jukka Rissanen (3): neard: Rename the recipe as we are already in 0.10 neard: Use SRCREV instead of SRCPV neard: Split recipe to two parts meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard.inc

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Andreas Müller
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 5/2/13 9:34 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> >> On Thursday 02 May 2013 08:35:55 Mark Hatle wrote: >>> >>> On 5/2/13 2:49 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: on one of my build machines useradd.bbclass seem to use the UID/GID of build host. On

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 02 May 2013 15:49:39 Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 15:34 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > Right, do_install will be well before this stuff happens and it is not a > > fakeroot task anyway. This needs to be moved to a postinstall script > > (which > > should be able to run

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Mark Hatle
On 5/2/13 9:34 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 02 May 2013 08:35:55 Mark Hatle wrote: On 5/2/13 2:49 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: on one of my build machines useradd.bbclass seem to use the UID/GID of build host. On other machines useradd works correct. I have the follwing in gdm: do_insta

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 15:34 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 02 May 2013 08:35:55 Mark Hatle wrote: > > On 5/2/13 2:49 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: > > > on one of my build machines useradd.bbclass seem to use the UID/GID of > > > build host. On other machines useradd works correct. > > > >

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Andreas Müller
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 02 May 2013 08:35:55 Mark Hatle wrote: >> On 5/2/13 2:49 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: >> > on one of my build machines useradd.bbclass seem to use the UID/GID of >> > build host. On other machines useradd works correct. >> > >> > I ha

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 02 May 2013 08:35:55 Mark Hatle wrote: > On 5/2/13 2:49 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: > > on one of my build machines useradd.bbclass seem to use the UID/GID of > > build host. On other machines useradd works correct. > > > > I have the follwing in gdm: > > > > > > do_install_append() {

[OE-core] [PATCH] neard: Split recipe to two parts

2013-05-02 Thread Jukka Rissanen
This way it is easier to override settings if needed. Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen --- meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard.inc | 59 +++ meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.10.bb | 11 + meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.9.bb | 69 ---

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] fs-perms.txt: Don't tinker with file modes in /usr/src/debug

2013-05-02 Thread Mark Hatle
On 5/2/13 8:55 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: Since 6775feb9fe935ab01fd9cae2b2d3fce5824a9a72 our local "copy" of the debug sources has in fact been hardlinked to ${S} and potentially other places too. This means that any modifications we make to these files might have wider consequences than intended.

[OE-core] [PATCH] fs-perms.txt: Don't tinker with file modes in /usr/src/debug

2013-05-02 Thread Phil Blundell
Since 6775feb9fe935ab01fd9cae2b2d3fce5824a9a72 our local "copy" of the debug sources has in fact been hardlinked to ${S} and potentially other places too. This means that any modifications we make to these files might have wider consequences than intended. Avoid this potential pitfall by telling

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] package.bbclass: Remove redundant chmod/chown operations

2013-05-02 Thread Mark Hatle
On 5/2/13 8:20 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: These were introduced in 6021e309e69d823e1467648aee12a32182945569. The code currently reads: os.link(file, fpath) fstat = cpath.stat(file) os.chmod(fpath, fstat.st_mode) os.chown(fpath, f

Re: [OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Mark Hatle
On 5/2/13 2:49 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: Hi, on one of my build machines useradd.bbclass seem to use the UID/GID of build host. On other machines useradd works correct. I have the follwing in gdm: do_install_append() { ... chown -R gdm:gdm ${D}${localstatedir}/lib/gdm chmod 075

Re: [OE-core] yajl: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found

2013-05-02 Thread Burton, Ross
On 2 May 2013 14:16, Stuart Yoder wrote: > It's just my observation that there seems to be a discrepancy between > what is getting built and packaged. Things get built in ./lib and > packaged from ./lib64. It looks like yajl is hard-coding "lib" but presumably your machine configuration wants t

[OE-core] Please submit your unindexed layers

2013-05-02 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi all, Even a cursory search of github reveals that there are a growing number of layers being worked on in the community that aren't currently listed in the OE layer index. I don't think it would be right for us to just add all of these in bulk as we don't necessarily have all the needed info

[OE-core] [PATCH] package.bbclass: Remove redundant chmod/chown operations

2013-05-02 Thread Phil Blundell
These were introduced in 6021e309e69d823e1467648aee12a32182945569. The code currently reads: os.link(file, fpath) fstat = cpath.stat(file) os.chmod(fpath, fstat.st_mode) os.chown(fpath, fstat.st_uid, fstat.st_gid) which can have no

Re: [OE-core] yajl: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found

2013-05-02 Thread Stuart Yoder
yajl/libyajl is a dependeny I have for another package I'm trying to build so I'm not touching the yajl recipe at all. In fact the complete recipe is this: - DESCRIPTION = "Yet Another JSON Library - A Portable JSON parsing and serializat LICENSE = "MIT" LIC_FILES_

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc-runtime: Avoid error when trying to remove nonexistent directories

2013-05-02 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 13:54 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 2 May 2013 13:19, Phil Blundell wrote: > > If we didn't build libgomp then we won't have installed anything into > > ${infodir} or ${libdir}/gcc/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/finclude. Check > > whether those directories exist before trying to r

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc-runtime: Avoid error when trying to remove nonexistent directories

2013-05-02 Thread Burton, Ross
On 2 May 2013 13:19, Phil Blundell wrote: > If we didn't build libgomp then we won't have installed anything into > ${infodir} or ${libdir}/gcc/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/finclude. Check > whether those directories exist before trying to remove them, else we > will lose. Isn't it neater to use rm -rf

[OE-core] [PATCH] gcc-runtime: Avoid error when trying to remove nonexistent directories

2013-05-02 Thread Phil Blundell
If we didn't build libgomp then we won't have installed anything into ${infodir} or ${libdir}/gcc/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/finclude. Check whether those directories exist before trying to remove them, else we will lose. Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell --- meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-runti

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] insane.bbclass: Add missing R* variables to pkgvarcheck

2013-05-02 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 11:36 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 02 May 2013 11:16:30 Phil Blundell wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 14:25 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > * check also RSUGGESTS, RCONFLICTS, RPROVIDES, RREPLACES > > > > These are already checked by recipe_sanity.bbclass. The

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] insane.bbclass: Add missing R* variables to pkgvarcheck

2013-05-02 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 02 May 2013 11:16:30 Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 14:25 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > * check also RSUGGESTS, RCONFLICTS, RPROVIDES, RREPLACES > > These are already checked by recipe_sanity.bbclass. There's probably no > need to check them again here. recipe_sanity.b

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] insane.bbclass: Add missing R* variables to pkgvarcheck

2013-05-02 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 14:25 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > * check also RSUGGESTS, RCONFLICTS, RPROVIDES, RREPLACES These are already checked by recipe_sanity.bbclass. There's probably no need to check them again here. p. ___ Openembedded-core mailing

Re: [OE-core] yajl: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found

2013-05-02 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 02 May 2013 10:24:10 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 1 May 2013 20:11, Stuart Yoder wrote: > >FILES_yajl="/usr/bin/* /usr/sbin/* /usr/lib64/yajl/* ... > > > > Ho do I get the yajl recipe to either a) build the files in lib64 or > > b) package them from lib. > > Don't hard-code paths, in

Re: [OE-core] yajl: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found

2013-05-02 Thread Burton, Ross
On 1 May 2013 20:11, Stuart Yoder wrote: >FILES_yajl="/usr/bin/* /usr/sbin/* /usr/lib64/yajl/* ... > > Ho do I get the yajl recipe to either a) build the files in lib64 or > b) package them from lib. Don't hard-code paths, instead use the symbols available in bitbake.conf: FILES_yajl = "${bi

[OE-core] useradd.bbclass question

2013-05-02 Thread Andreas Müller
Hi, on one of my build machines useradd.bbclass seem to use the UID/GID of build host. On other machines useradd works correct. I have the follwing in gdm: do_install_append() { ... chown -R gdm:gdm ${D}${localstatedir}/lib/gdm chmod 0750 ${D}${localstatedir}/lib/gdm } ... USERADD