Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base.bbclass: Fix matching of SOC_FAMILY in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE

2013-04-06 Thread Eric Bénard
Le Sat, 6 Apr 2013 17:58:30 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : > On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Eric Bénard wrote: > > Hi Otavio, > > > > Le Sat, 6 Apr 2013 14:17:48 -0300, > > Otavio Salvador a écrit : > > > >> When a SOC_FAMILY has more than one value, split by ':' as usual > >> OVERRIDES, th

Re: [OE-core] Incorrect FILESPATH usages

2013-04-06 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Saturday 06 April 2013 15:14:20 Chris Larson wrote: > On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: > > I have run across a problem where a main recipe is written in > > such a way that makes using .bbappend impossible. This happens > > if the main recipe has an explicit assignment for FI

Re: [OE-core] Incorrect FILESPATH usages

2013-04-06 Thread Chris Larson
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: > I have run across a problem where a main recipe is written in > such a way that makes using .bbappend impossible. This happens > if the main recipe has an explicit assignment for FILESPATH. > In this case, the .bbappend is unable to add to tha

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] udev: enable multilib support

2013-04-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 12:32 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 5 apr. 2013, om 16:34 heeft Richard Purdie > het volgende geschreven: > > > On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 16:29 +0300, Alex Damian wrote: > >> On udev-184 they changed the default location from /sbin/ > >> to /lib/udev/ and I kept same as the upst

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base.bbclass: Fix matching of SOC_FAMILY in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE

2013-04-06 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Eric Bénard wrote: > Hi Otavio, > > Le Sat, 6 Apr 2013 14:17:48 -0300, > Otavio Salvador a écrit : > >> When a SOC_FAMILY has more than one value, split by ':' as usual >> OVERRIDES, this were not being properly checked in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE >> matching as we need

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base.bbclass: Fix matching of SOC_FAMILY in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE

2013-04-06 Thread Eric Bénard
Hi Otavio, Le Sat, 6 Apr 2013 14:17:48 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : > When a SOC_FAMILY has more than one value, split by ':' as usual > OVERRIDES, this were not being properly checked in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE > matching as we need to iterate over each SoC family and check if it is > compatibl

[OE-core] [PATCH] base.bbclass: Fix matching of SOC_FAMILY in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE

2013-04-06 Thread Otavio Salvador
When a SOC_FAMILY has more than one value, split by ':' as usual OVERRIDES, this were not being properly checked in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE matching as we need to iterate over each SoC family and check if it is compatible or not. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador --- meta/classes/base.bbclass | 12 +

Re: [OE-core] Does support for external toolchains working in current OE?

2013-04-06 Thread Martin Jansa
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 12:10:01AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > I've already tried that, systemd's configure does not respect that. I've patch for systemd which "fixes" this: diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_199.bb b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_199.bb index e574548..2bb9566 1

[OE-core] Incorrect FILESPATH usages

2013-04-06 Thread Gary Thomas
I have run across a problem where a main recipe is written in such a way that makes using .bbappend impossible. This happens if the main recipe has an explicit assignment for FILESPATH. In this case, the .bbappend is unable to add to that path, e.g. to add a machine specific patch, etc. I found

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] linux-firmware: make the main package depend on all sub-packages

2013-04-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 12:36 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > And also staging firmware files just once to resolve > > > WARNING: The recipe linux-firmware is trying to install files into a > shared area when those files already exist. Those files are: > > when building linux-firmware after kernel was b

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] linux-firmware: make the main package depend on all sub-packages

2013-04-06 Thread Martin Jansa
And also staging firmware files just once to resolve > WARNING: The recipe linux-firmware is trying to install files into a shared area when those files already exist. Those files are: when building linux-firmware after kernel was built and vice-versa. On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Koen Kooi

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] udev: enable multilib support

2013-04-06 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 5 apr. 2013, om 16:34 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 16:29 +0300, Alex Damian wrote: >> On udev-184 they changed the default location from /sbin/ >> to /lib/udev/ and I kept same as the upstream is. > > Firstly, I know some people did ask me questions

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] systemd: added python-systemd package generation.

2013-04-06 Thread Yevhen Kyriukha
2013/4/6 Koen Kooi : > > Op 6 apr. 2013, om 00:38 heeft Yevhen Kyriukha het > volgende geschreven: > >> --- >> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_199.bb | 20 >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_199.bb >> b

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] linux-firmware: make the main package depend on all sub-packages

2013-04-06 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 5 apr. 2013, om 19:06 heeft Ross Burton het volgende geschreven: > Whilst splitting out specific large firmware blobs is a good move for space > saving, it makes installing "all the firmware" tricky. > > Make linux-firmware depend on all of the separated packages so that installing > that p

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] systemd: added python-systemd package generation.

2013-04-06 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 6 apr. 2013, om 00:38 heeft Yevhen Kyriukha het volgende geschreven: > --- > meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_199.bb | 20 > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_199.bb > b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/syste

Re: [OE-core] experiences with images based on current layer heads

2013-04-06 Thread Andreas Müller
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > If you are unable to look into this yourself, can you please file a bug on > the bugzilla.yoctoproject.org website? This issue is likely to get more > attention if there is an active bug with reproducer steps. (What you have > below may be enou