Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] uclibc: Revert systemd regressing patch from upsteam uclibc

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 22:59 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > This patch is causing systemd based systemd to not boot > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > --- > meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc-git.inc|5 +- > ...nt.c-wtent.c-move-functions-from-utxent.c.patch | 321 > > 2

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/3] kernel.bbclass, module-base.bbclass: Use CC to form KERNEL_CC

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 22:59 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > kernel compiler is not special and we currently have it so > we want to pass -march and -mtune options as CFLAGS to kernel > build so that compiler picks the right subarch flags when > compiling assembly files in particular. Historically, the ke

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] uclibc: Revert systemd regressing patch from upsteam uclibc

2012-09-11 Thread Khem Raj
This patch is causing systemd based systemd to not boot Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc-git.inc|5 +- ...nt.c-wtent.c-move-functions-from-utxent.c.patch | 321 2 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] runqemu: Explicitly specify MACHINE when calling bitbake

2012-09-11 Thread Khem Raj
When using runqemu with distros outside oe-core then MACHINE may not be there in local.conf so use the one thats available in environment of runqemu which is actually the correct one. Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- scripts/runqemu |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/3] kernel.bbclass, module-base.bbclass: Use CC to form KERNEL_CC

2012-09-11 Thread Khem Raj
kernel compiler is not special and we currently have it so we want to pass -march and -mtune options as CFLAGS to kernel build so that compiler picks the right subarch flags when compiling assembly files in particular. Otherwise defaults are chosen which may not be right in many case e.g. when comp

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] recipes-rt: Update rt-tests, hwlatdetect, and core-image-rt images

2012-09-11 Thread Darren Hart
These changes have been tested on the meta-intel sys940x BSP. cyclictest and hwlatdetect run successfully. The following changes since commit 48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7: classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists (2012-09-10 21:52:37 +0100) are available i

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] rt-tests: Add hwlatdetect package

2012-09-11 Thread Darren Hart
Split out rt-tests into rt-tests and hwlatdetect packages as the latter requires python and we want to be able to install the core rt-tests on minimal systems without python. This also addresses QA warnings about the hwlatdetect files not being packaged. Add an RRECOMMENDS on the hwlat kernel mod

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] rt: Add hwlatdetect to rt images

2012-09-11 Thread Darren Hart
This adds the newly separated hwlatdetect package to the rt images. While this pulls in a python dependency, it is worth have hwlatdetect installed by default on these images as they are intended to assist in the evaluation of platforms for use in real-time environments. Signed-off-by: Darren Hart

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] rt-tests: Update to 0.84, use the kernel.org git repository

2012-09-11 Thread Darren Hart
The maintainer of rt-tests has recreated the git repository on kernel.org and has stated that kernel.org is now the official source for rt-tests. Update to 0.84. Remove the user cflags and ldflags patch as it is included in the 0.84 release. Signed-off-by: Darren Hart --- .../makefile-support-u

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core] valgrind: fix debug info reading error when do memcheck on ppc targets

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 09:02 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:44 PM, wrote: From: Zhenhua Luo following is the error message: --2263-- WARNING: Serious error when reading debug info --2263-- When reading debug info from /lib/ld-2.13.so: -

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core] valgrind: fix debug info reading error when do memcheck on ppc targets

2012-09-11 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:44 PM, wrote: > From: Zhenhua Luo > > following is the error message: > --2263-- WARNING: Serious error when reading debug info > --2263-- When reading debug info from /lib/ld-2.13.so: > --2263-- Can't make sense of .got section mapping >

[OE-core] [oe-core] valgrind: fix debug info reading error when do memcheck on ppc targets

2012-09-11 Thread b19537
From: Zhenhua Luo following is the error message: --2263-- WARNING: Serious error when reading debug info --2263-- When reading debug info from /lib/ld-2.13.so: --2263-- Can't make sense of .got section mapping --2263-- WARNING: Serious error when reading debug

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] gcc: Switch SRC_URI to use svn

2012-09-11 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2012-09-05 22:35, Khem Raj wrote: svn tar balls are 96M as compared to 1.3G git tars its unnessary to suck in that much of data. Fixes [YOCTO #2908] Signed-off-by: Khem Raj What about this patch? Carrying around a 1.7GB (Sorry, Khem, that's the size of my tar ball!) is a bit much, espe

Re: [OE-core] /usr/bin/python is needed by git

2012-09-11 Thread Jack Mitchell
On 11/09/2012 22:02, Khem Raj wrote: HI Mark, I sent a patch (see above) which added python as a dependency and that seemed to fix it. Whether or not this is the right fix I don't know... should git require the python binary to run? I really don't know much about it... I wonder what needs pyth

Re: [OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3093 > > There has been a bug open for this for years :( > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149 > > Ross appears to have recently closed it as NOTABUG but I think he > mis

Re: [OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Burton, Ross
On 11 September 2012 22:00, Richard Purdie wrote: > There has been a bug open for this for years :( > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149 > > Ross appears to have recently closed it as NOTABUG but I think he > misunderstood the problem. Yes, the bug said "exit". :/ I've taken

Re: [OE-core] /usr/bin/python is needed by git

2012-09-11 Thread Khem Raj
> HI Mark, > > I sent a patch (see above) which added python as a dependency and that > seemed to fix it. Whether or not this is the right fix I don't know... > should git require the python binary to run? I really don't know much about > it... I wonder what needs python in git. Can you inspect ?

Re: [OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 12:36 -0700, Scott Garman wrote: > On 09/11/2012 12:23 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 11 September 2012 20:19, Scott Garman wrote: > >> Negatory on both counts. Sounds like a bug? > > > > Certainly does. Not sure how that regressed or how QA didn't notice. > > So clicking on

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] udev: upgrade to 182

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/06/2012 02:27 AM, Alex DAMIAN wrote: From: Alexandru DAMIAN This is the final upgrade of udev. Futher upgrades will only come in conjunction with systemd. The v4l1 removal patch is deprecated as the bug is fixed inside udev. There is a new patch fixing the path for default sh interpreter

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Khem Raj
On (11/09/12 19:53), Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 11:40 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Koen Kooi > > wrote: > > > From a gcc point of view both are the same ISA, but using xscale will > > > take in account the absurdly long pipeline on that SoC. > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto/3.4: v3.4.10 and uprobes/kprobes configuration updates

2012-09-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-09-11 09:33 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:27:50AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 08:37 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:31:42AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 02:59 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Bruce

Re: [OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Scott Garman
On 09/11/2012 12:23 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 11 September 2012 20:19, Scott Garman wrote: Negatory on both counts. Sounds like a bug? Certainly does. Not sure how that regressed or how QA didn't notice. So clicking on a button or check box doesn't make the keyboard hide? Eek. Eek, indeed

Re: [OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Burton, Ross
On 11 September 2012 20:19, Scott Garman wrote: > Negatory on both counts. Sounds like a bug? Certainly does. Not sure how that regressed or how QA didn't notice. So clicking on a button or check box doesn't make the keyboard hide? Eek. Ross ___ Open

[OE-core] [RFC 17/18] libx11-diet: remove un-needed chunk from stubs patch

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- .../xorg-lib/libx11/X18NCMSstubs.diff | 20 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11/X18NCMSstubs.diff b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11/X18NCMSstubs.diff index 8cd1870..9e91a8b 1

[OE-core] [RFC 18/18] libx11: revise keysymdef patch based on submission upstream

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- .../xorg-lib/libx11/keysymdef_include.patch| 38 meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11_1.5.0.bb |2 +- 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11/keysymdef_include.pat

[OE-core] [RFC 13/18] libx11-trim: remove, it's the same as libx11 now

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb | 15 --- 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb b/meta/recipes-grap

[OE-core] [RFC 14/18] distro-tracking: remove libx11-trim

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/distro_alias.inc |1 - meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc |1 - meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/recipe_color.inc |1 - 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/distro_alias.in

Re: [OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Scott Garman
On 09/11/2012 12:16 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 11 September 2012 20:13, Scott Garman wrote: In the Sato desktop, there is a virtual keyboard which you can bring up to enter text from a touchscreen interface. Once that keyboard pops up, how do you close it? I'm not seeing anything obvious. I'm

[OE-core] [RFC 09/18] libx11: refresh dependencies, and centralise into libx11.inc

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |3 --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb |2 -- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc |5 - meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11_1.5.0.bb |5 - 4 files

[OE-core] [RFC 02/18] libx11-diet: you can't disable XCB anymore, so don't try

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb index ed5a890..d821744 10064

[OE-core] [RFC 16/18] libx11: makekeys can be cross-compiled now, so don't hack around

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- .../recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |5 +-- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc | 43 ++-- .../xorg-lib/libx11/x11_disable_makekeys.patch | 34 meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11_1.5.0.bb

[OE-core] [RFC 03/18] libx11-diet: you can't disable UDC, because it's always disabled

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb index d821744..e6aa63f 100644

[OE-core] [RFC 11/18] libx11-diet: remove statements that are redundant

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |6 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb index 5ab..cb9a5ef 100644 -

[OE-core] [RFC 07/18] libx11: remove redundant license data

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |2 -- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb |3 --- 2 files changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-

[OE-core] [RFC 15/18] libx11: drop makekeys_crosscompile.patch, effectively merged upstream

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- .../xorg-lib/libx11/makekeys_crosscompile.patch| 76 meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11_1.5.0.bb |3 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 78 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11/makekeys_crossc

[OE-core] [RFC 08/18] libx11: merge patches into a single directory

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- .../xorg-lib/libx11-1.5.0/keysymdef_include.patch | 23 - .../libx11-1.5.0/makekeys_crosscompile.patch | 76 --- .../libx11-1.5.0/x11_disable_makekeys.patch| 34 -- .../xorg-lib/libx11-diet-1.5.0/X18NCMSstubs.diff | 541

[OE-core] [RFC 10/18] libx11: make bigfont an optional (disabled by default) packageconfig option

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc |8 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc index 85fdbe7..d56aa23 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/

[OE-core] [RFC 04/18] xorg-lib: move options to disable documentation to xorg-lib-common

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc |4 +--- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxi_1.6.1.bb |4 +--- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/xorg-lib-common.inc |3 ++- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes

[OE-core] [RFC 05/18] libx11: move xcms disabling to PACKAGECONFIG in libx11.inc

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |2 +- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb |2 +- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc |6 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recip

[OE-core] [RFC 12/18] default-providers: default to libx11, not -trim

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc index 2d8a17d..07222c2 100644 --- a/meta/conf/distr

[OE-core] [RFC 01/18] libx11: use INC_PR

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |2 +- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb |2 +- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc |1 + meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11_1.5.0.bb |2 +- 4 files changed

[OE-core] [RFC 06/18] libx11: move keysymdefdir option to .inc

2012-09-11 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-diet_1.5.0.bb |2 +- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb |2 -- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc |4 +++- meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11_1.5.0.bb |2 -- 4 files chan

Re: [OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Burton, Ross
On 11 September 2012 20:13, Scott Garman wrote: > In the Sato desktop, there is a virtual keyboard which you can bring up to > enter text from a touchscreen interface. Once that keyboard pops up, how do > you close it? I'm not seeing anything obvious. > > I'm helping out with a demo at a conferenc

[OE-core] Sato virtual keyboard - how to close it?

2012-09-11 Thread Scott Garman
Hello, In the Sato desktop, there is a virtual keyboard which you can bring up to enter text from a touchscreen interface. Once that keyboard pops up, how do you close it? I'm not seeing anything obvious. I'm helping out with a demo at a conference and could use this info urgently. Thanks,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] autotools.bbclass: Add functionality to force a clean of ${B} when reconfiguring (and ${S} != ${B})

2012-09-11 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > Unfortunately whilst rerunning configure and make against a project will > mostly > work there are situations where it does not correctly do the right thing. > > In particular, eglibc and gcc will fail out with errors where settings > do no

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED REQUEST 00/13] Misc Fixes (cover only)

2012-09-11 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 09/11/2012 09:14 AM, Saul Wold wrote: >> >> >> The following changes since commit >> 48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7: >> >>classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists >> (2012-09-10 21:52:37 +0100) >> >> are

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 11:40 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > From a gcc point of view both are the same ISA, but using xscale will take > > in account the absurdly long pipeline on that SoC. > > Not really, when you tune for XScale it will use ldrd/s

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > From a gcc point of view both are the same ISA, but using xscale will take in > account the absurdly long pipeline on that SoC. Not really, when you tune for XScale it will use ldrd/strd and pld if possible

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] eglibc: Restore ${PN} to before ${PN}-dev in PACKAGES

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 11:14 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: Commit 13544fbc6217fee1731a6da1e2cf94901a500842 changed the ordering of PACKAGES so that ${PN}-dev came before ${PN}. However, this caused the FILES matching to go wrong if ${libdir} == ${base_libdir}. Fix this by moving ${PN} ahead of ${PN}-dev once

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] eglibc: Restore ${PN} to before ${PN}-dev in PACKAGES

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
Commit 13544fbc6217fee1731a6da1e2cf94901a500842 changed the ordering of PACKAGES so that ${PN}-dev came before ${PN}. However, this caused the FILES matching to go wrong if ${libdir} == ${base_libdir}. Fix this by moving ${PN} ahead of ${PN}-dev once again. Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell --- V2:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: Restore ${PN} to before ${PN}-dev in PACKAGES

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
Ah right, yeah, I guess so. Thanks, I'll re-send. Do we have any roadmap for getting to a point where we don't need to keep bumping PR by hand anymore? p. On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 20:09 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > Missing PR bumps? > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > > C

[OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: Restore ${PN} to before ${PN}-dev in PACKAGES

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
Commit 13544fbc6217fee1731a6da1e2cf94901a500842 changed the ordering of PACKAGES so that ${PN}-dev came before ${PN}. However, this caused the FILES matching to go wrong if ${libdir} == ${base_libdir}. Fix this by moving ${PN} ahead of ${PN}-dev once again. Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell --- met

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] sysvinit-inittab_2.88dsf.bb: only run serial checks at boot if we have items to check

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 12:56 -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: > Right now, we delay running the serial console checks to we boot up. This > causes > issues for read only file systems. So, if have not configured any serial > ports to > check via SERIAL_CONSOLES_CHECK we can skip the check at boot.

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/11/12 12:43 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:37:23PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 19:35 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: If this works then DISTRO would have finer control of which DEFAULTTUNE to use 1) default: don't use mtune, optimize only for march (do

[OE-core] [PATCH v3] sysvinit-inittab_2.88dsf.bb: only run serial checks at boot if we have items to check

2012-09-11 Thread Matthew McClintock
Right now, we delay running the serial console checks to we boot up. This causes issues for read only file systems. So, if have not configured any serial ports to check via SERIAL_CONSOLES_CHECK we can skip the check at boot. This fixes any issues with read only file systems and ipk packaging. Si

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:37:23PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 19:35 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > If this works then DISTRO would have finer control of which DEFAULTTUNE > > to use > > > > 1) default: don't use mtune, optimize only for march (don't mix mtune in > > the sa

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 19:35 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > If this works then DISTRO would have finer control of which DEFAULTTUNE > to use > > 1) default: don't use mtune, optimize only for march (don't mix mtune in > the same feed). > > 2) include optimized-tune.inc in distro.conf: use mtune only

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 07:21:07PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:14:22PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 18:53 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > If we drop DEFAULTTUNE from tune-xscale and tune-arm926ejs then > > > PACKAGE_ARCH=armv5te would be the sam

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:14:22PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 18:53 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > If we drop DEFAULTTUNE from tune-xscale and tune-arm926ejs then > > PACKAGE_ARCH=armv5te would be the same and the same feed will be built > > only once. > > Well, that would

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 18:53 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > If we drop DEFAULTTUNE from tune-xscale and tune-arm926ejs then > PACKAGE_ARCH=armv5te would be the same and the same feed will be built > only once. Well, that would also make those two tune files rather useless. It seems like it would be

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 05:46:12PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 15:01 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Shouldn't spitz produce something like armv5te-xscale and qemuarm > > armv5te-arm926ejs? > > That's a DISTRO policy decision really. > > "armv5te", in common with most of t

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 15:01 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > Shouldn't spitz produce something like armv5te-xscale and qemuarm > armv5te-arm926ejs? That's a DISTRO policy decision really. "armv5te", in common with most of the PACKAGE_ARCHes, represents an ISA. That is, it is guaranteed to only conta

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 11/32] sysvinit-inittab_2.88dsf.bb: Allow multiple serial port consoles to be defined

2012-09-11 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 14:14 -0700, Scott Garman wrote: >> +pkg_postinst_${PN} () { >> +# run this on the target >> +if [ "x$D" == "x" ]; then > > By the way, "==" is a bashism; that should just be "=" for portability. > Or you can use '-z "$D

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:09:53AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 9/11/12 10:59 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:51:40AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > >> On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > >>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED REQUEST 00/13] Misc Fixes (cover only)

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 09:14 AM, Saul Wold wrote: The following changes since commit 48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7: classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists (2012-09-10 21:52:37 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembe

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/5] libexif: upgrade to 0.6.21

2012-09-11 Thread Constantin Musca
Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca --- .../{libexif_0.6.20.bb => libexif_0.6.21.bb} |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-support/libexif/{libexif_0.6.20.bb => libexif_0.6.21.bb} (74%) diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libexif/libexif_0.6.20.bb b/

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] glew: upgrade to 1.9.0

2012-09-11 Thread Constantin Musca
Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca --- .../glew/{glew_1.7.0.bb => glew_1.9.0.bb} |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-graphics/glew/{glew_1.7.0.bb => glew_1.9.0.bb} (80%) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/glew/glew_1.7.0.bb b/meta/recipes-gr

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] boost: upgrade to 1.51.0

2012-09-11 Thread Constantin Musca
Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca --- .../boost/{boost_1.50.0.bb => boost_1.51.0.bb} |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-support/boost/{boost_1.50.0.bb => boost_1.51.0.bb} (53%) diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/boost/boost_1.50.0.bb b/meta/recipe

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] sysstat: upgrade to 10.1.1

2012-09-11 Thread Constantin Musca
Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca --- meta/recipes-extended/sysstat/sysstat_10.0.5.bb |8 meta/recipes-extended/sysstat/sysstat_10.1.1.bb |8 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/sysstat/sysstat_10.0.5.bb create mode 1

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] Package upgrades

2012-09-11 Thread Constantin Musca
This is another set of package upgrades compiled on all architectures and tested using core-image-sato. The following changes since commit 7250638ec895bc89508711831083d43b9e1e9826: upstream_tracking: Fix format issues (2012-09-10 23:21:12 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://

[OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED REQUEST 00/13] Misc Fixes (cover only)

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
The following changes since commit 48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7: classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists (2012-09-10 21:52:37 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/stage http://cgit.op

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 11 sep. 2012, om 17:51 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven: > On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed) >>> resulting packages are tun

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/11/12 10:59 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:51:40AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Hi, when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed) resulting pac

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] image_types.bbclass: Round up ROOTFS_SIZE after base_size check

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/10/2012 11:18 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: If we round up ROOTFS_SIZE to IMAGE_ROOTFS_ALIGNMENT before checking if base_size is greater then IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE, we can end up adding an unaligned value to IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE. Obviously, if IMAGE_ROOTFS_EXTRA_SPACE was overwritten with an unaligned

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 08:58 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:41 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:51:40AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed) > >> resulting packages are tuned with

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:41 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > >> On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >>> When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have > >>> CONFIG_X86_X32=y. > >>>

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] sysvinit-inittab_2.88dsf.bb: only run serial checks at boot if we have items to check

2012-09-11 Thread Matthew McClintock
Right now, we delay running the serial console checks to we boot up. This causes issues for read only file systems. So, if have not configured any serial ports to check via SERIAL_CONSOLES_CHECK we can skip the check at boot. This fixes any issues with read only file systems and ipk packaging. Si

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arch-ia32: Add x32 to MACHINEOVERRIDES

2012-09-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:36 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > On 09/11/2012 08:13 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > >> This will allow the KERNEL_FEATURES to trigger the x32 ABI via overrides > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold > >> --- > >> meta/conf/mac

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arch-ia32: Add x32 to MACHINEOVERRIDES

2012-09-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/11/12 10:36 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:13 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: This will allow the KERNEL_FEATURES to trigger the x32 ABI via overrides Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc |1

Re: [OE-core] ARM-tuning -- was qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/11/12 8:48 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Hi, when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed) resulting packages are tuned with -mtune=xscale (when built for spitz) or -mtune=arm926ej-s (when built for qemuarm)

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] git: add missing Python dependency

2012-09-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 9/11/12 5:33 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote: From: Jack Mitchell Add python to DEPENDS as it fails to install on target with RPM failing at do_rootfs due to un-met dependencies. Signed-off-by: Jack Mitchell --- meta/recipes-devtools/git/git.inc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletio

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have CONFIG_X86_X32=y. This can be accomplished by adding the x32 configuraion fragment to the KER

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have CONFIG_X86_X32=y. This can be accomplished by adding the x32 configuraion fragment to the KERNEL_FEATURES when x32 is the tuning for a given

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arch-ia32: Add x32 to MACHINEOVERRIDES

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 08:13 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: This will allow the KERNEL_FEATURES to trigger the x32 ABI via overrides Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have CONFIG_X86_X32=y. This can be accomplished by adding the x32 configuraion fragment to the KERNEL_FEATURES when x32 is the tuning for a given machine. cc: Saul Wold Signed-off-by:

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] linux-yocto*: append to KERNEL_FEATURES instead of assigning

2012-09-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
It is sometimes useful for KERNEL_FEATURES to be set in a machine or other configuration file. The linux-yocto recipes currently initialize the variable, which clobbers any values set by .conf files. Appending to the variables allows these settings to propagate to the kernel configuration, while m

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook

2012-09-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have CONFIG_X86_X32=y. This can be accomplished by adding the x32 configuraion fragment to the KERNEL_FEATURES when x32 is the tuning for a given machine. cc: Saul Wold Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- meta/recipes-kernel/linux/

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] linux-yocto: x32 and features update

2012-09-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Richard/Saul, This is my part of a change that Saul will complete with the addition of x32 as a machine override for x86 BSPs that have x32 as their tuning. With this change, the x32 configuration fragment will be appended to any give x86 BSP configuration and it will support the userspace tuning

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arch-ia32: Add x32 to MACHINEOVERRIDES

2012-09-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > This will allow the KERNEL_FEATURES to trigger the x32 ABI via overrides > > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold > --- > meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc |1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/con

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] libgnome-keyring: add missing DEPENDS on intltool-native

2012-09-11 Thread jackie.huang
From: Jackie Huang The following changes since commit 48169c6bc44c546cecaa06207b6c36da558b81f7: classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists (2012-09-10 21:52:37 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib jhuang0/bug3081_libgno

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] libgnome-keyring: add missing DEPENDS on intltool-native

2012-09-11 Thread jackie.huang
From: Jackie Huang libgnome-keyring requires command 'intltoolize' in configure, so add DEPENDS intltool-native. [YOCTO #3081] Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang --- .../recipes-gnome/gnome/libgnome-keyring_2.32.0.bb |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/re

[OE-core] [PATCH] arch-ia32: Add x32 to MACHINEOVERRIDES

2012-09-11 Thread Saul Wold
This will allow the KERNEL_FEATURES to trigger the x32 ABI via overrides Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/ia

[OE-core] [PATCH] libgpg-error: Use the source file for the licence checksum

2012-09-11 Thread Richard Purdie
It makes sense to us the license checksum from the source .in file rather than that from the generated file which configure can change (or remove). Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libgpg-error/libgpg-error_1.10.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libgpg-error/libgpg-err

[OE-core] [PATCH] autotools.bbclass: Add functionality to force a clean of ${B} when reconfiguring (and ${S} != ${B})

2012-09-11 Thread Richard Purdie
Unfortunately whilst rerunning configure and make against a project will mostly work there are situations where it does not correctly do the right thing. In particular, eglibc and gcc will fail out with errors where settings do not match a previously built configuration. It could be argued they ar

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/1] nativesdk-qemu: fix SDK relocation issue

2012-09-11 Thread Laurentiu Palcu
User mode emulation binaries are linked using a local linker script. The nativesdk ones were not used and the resulting binaries did not have the interp section resized. Hence, those binaries could not be relocated. [YOCTO #3083] Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu --- .../qemu/qemu-1.2.0/relocatabl

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/1] Fix nativesdk-qemu relocation issue

2012-09-11 Thread Laurentiu Palcu
Changes in V2: - bump PR Thanks, Laurentiu The following changes since commit 7250638ec895bc89508711831083d43b9e1e9826: upstream_tracking: Fix format issues (2012-09-10 23:21:12 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib lpalcu/qemu_issue

Re: [OE-core] qemuarm: should it really have TUNE_ARCH armv5te?

2012-09-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:01:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > Hi, > > when building spitz and qemuarm (both produces packages in armv5te feed) > resulting packages are tuned with -mtune=xscale (when built for spitz) > or -mtune=arm926ej-s (when built for qemuarm). > > From > https://bugzilla.y

[OE-core] [PATCH] nativesdk-qemu: fix SDK relocation issue

2012-09-11 Thread Laurentiu Palcu
User mode emulation binaries are linked using a local linker script. The nativesdk ones were not used and the resulting binaries did not have the interp section resized. Hence, those binaries could not be relocated. [YOCTO #3083] Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu --- .../qemu/qemu-1.2.0/relocatabl

Re: [OE-core] /usr/bin/python is needed by git

2012-09-11 Thread Jack Mitchell
= "arm" TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi" MACHINE = "beaglebone" DISTRO= "poky" DISTRO_VERSION= "1.2+snapshot-20120911" TUNE_FEATURES = "armv7a vfp neon cortexa8" TARGET_FPU= "vfp-neo

  1   2   >