On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 13:15 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Richard Purdie
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 16:06 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> >> Here's a consolidated update that I've had under test
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 10:15 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> so I figured. which now means you need to have patchelf on build host
> preinstalled instead of chrpath.
That'd be a bit of a pain, since (afaict) patchelf is not so widely
available in host distributions as chrpath.
> you never know. It just l
The header in sourcefile says its BSD licensed
not GPL therefore make the correction
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../unifdef/unifdef-native_2.6.18+git.bb |4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/unifdef/unifdef-native_2.6.18+git.bb
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 13:15 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 16:06 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >> Here's a consolidated update that I've had under test in one
> >> way or another for 3 weeks now. Tom Z and others
On Saturday, August 18, 2012, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> On Saturday 18 August 2012 10:05:52 Khem Raj wrote:
>> The header in sourcefile says its BSD licensed
>> not GPL therefore make the correction
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
>> ---
>> .../unifdef/unifdef-native_2.6.18+git.bb |4 ++
On Saturday 18 August 2012 10:05:52 Khem Raj wrote:
> The header in sourcefile says its BSD licensed
> not GPL therefore make the correction
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
> ---
> .../unifdef/unifdef-native_2.6.18+git.bb |4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> d
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 00:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a patchset that replaces use of chrpath with patchelf. Patchelf can
>> resize the ELF headers to accomodate larger RPATHs
>>
>> The branch is posted here
>>
>> http://git
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 16:06 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> Here's a consolidated update that I've had under test in one
>> way or another for 3 weeks now. Tom Z and others have also been
>> using parts of this for their work, so it has see
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> Could we be more specific there and say LICENSE = "BSD-2-Clause" ?
Its more BSD-3-Clause actually. So I have sent a V2
Thx
-Khem
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openemb
The header in sourcefile says its BSD licensed
not GPL therefore make the correction
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../unifdef/unifdef-native_2.6.18+git.bb |4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/unifdef/unifdef-native_2.6.18+git.bb
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 16:06 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> Here's a consolidated update that I've had under test in one
> way or another for 3 weeks now. Tom Z and others have also been
> using parts of this for their work, so it has seen a reasonably
> wide set of testers.
>
> This series further
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 16:27 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> It's been suggested that it would be a useful feature to be able to
> easily take a binary from a 3rd party software vendor and integrate
> it into an image created by the build system.
>
> * The user can easily use this by:
> # Specify whe
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 10:33 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > There is a bit of uncertainty flying around at the moment about why
> > these changes are failing on the autobuilder. For example:
> >
> > http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:801
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 16:06 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> The kernel branch is no longer required by the yocto-kern-tools
>> to locate BSP feature descriptions (it is the MACHINE:KTYPE
>> descriptor), so we no longer require that the BSP b
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
>> Log data follows:
>> | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_install
>> | install: cannot stat `tools/mkimage': No such file or directory
>> | ERROR: Function failed: do_install (see
>> /srv/ssd/sgw_ab/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-slave/nightly-world/b
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 16:06 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> The kernel branch is no longer required by the yocto-kern-tools
> to locate BSP feature descriptions (it is the MACHINE:KTYPE
> descriptor), so we no longer require that the BSP branch be
> explicitly set.
>
> If a kernel branch is explici
On Friday 17 August 2012 21:56:42 Khem Raj wrote:
> The header in sourcefile says its BSD licensed
> not GPL therefore make the correction
Could we be more specific there and say LICENSE = "BSD-2-Clause" ?
Thanks,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 00:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a patchset that replaces use of chrpath with patchelf. Patchelf can
> resize the ELF headers to accomodate larger RPATHs
>
> The branch is posted here
>
> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/patchel
Hi,
I have a patchset that replaces use of chrpath with patchelf. Patchelf can
resize the ELF headers to accomodate larger RPATHs
The branch is posted here
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/patchelf
Please test it out and let me know if you see any issues
-Khem
19 matches
Mail list logo
