On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> hmmm I guess cross recipes are special they should not have been built
> under target recipes. Adding build arch to package name would be ok
> too but may be if they were built under directory of their own which
> was something like -- then it wou
On 2011?11?24? 14:38, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 24 nov. 2011, om 04:06 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende geschreven:
From: Xiaofeng Yan
gtk run over x11 at current OE-core. If gtk want to run over directfb, then \
the configuration related to x11 should be disabled and directfb should be
enabled.
Ap
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:55 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Matthew McClintock
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> isnt BUILD_ARCH in signature
This is a TARGET recipe, so it should *not* be right?
>>>
>>> no this
Op 24 nov. 2011, om 04:06 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende geschreven:
> From: Xiaofeng Yan
>
> gtk run over x11 at current OE-core. If gtk want to run over directfb, then \
> the configuration related to x11 should be disabled and directfb should be
> enabled.
Apart from this patch is messing
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
isnt BUILD_ARCH in signature
>>>
>>> This is a TARGET recipe, so it should *not* be right?
>>
>> no this is a cross recipe.
>
> This is built in tmp/work/ppce5500-fsl-linux/gcc-cross
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> isnt BUILD_ARCH in signature
>>
>> This is a TARGET recipe, so it should *not* be right?
>
> no this is a cross recipe.
This is built in tmp/work/ppce5500-fsl-linux/gcc-cross-*
That's a TARGET package, even though it run on on the HOST... chan
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:35 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Matthew McClintock
>> wrote:
>>> Without some sort of dependency on the HOST arch this "fake"
>>> target package will be reused on a 32bit sys
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Matthew McClintock
> wrote:
>> Without some sort of dependency on the HOST arch this "fake"
>> target package will be reused on a 32bit system even if it was
>> built on a 64bit system.
>>
>> This new dependecy s
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Julian Pidancet
wrote:
> This patch introduces a distro feature which enables gcc to produce
> both 32bit and 64bit code, and enables binutils to operate on both
> 32bit and 64bit binaries. It differs from multilib toolchains in
> that it does not require to compil
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
> Without some sort of dependency on the HOST arch this "fake"
> target package will be reused on a 32bit system even if it was
> built on a 64bit system.
>
> This new dependecy should prevent that from occuring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew
From: Xiaofeng Yan
This file can make an image to run gtk over directfb.
[YOCTO #1674]
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan
---
.../images/core-image-gtk-directfb.bb | 21
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-graphics/im
From: Xiaofeng Yan
Add this package for checking whether directfb run rightly or not.
It also is an useful tool to test directfb.
[YOCTO #1674]
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan
---
.../directfb/directfb-examples_1.2.0.bb| 20
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0
From: Xiaofeng Yan
Add task-gtk-directfb.bb to OE core for running gtk over directfb.
[YOCTO #1674]
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan
---
meta/recipes-graphics/tasks/task-gtk-directfb.bb | 26 ++
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta/recipe
From: Xiaofeng Yan
cairo run over x11 at current OE-core. If cairo want to run over directfb, then
\
the configuration related to x11 should be disabled and directfb should be
enabled.
[YOCTO #1674]
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan
---
meta/recipes-graphics/cairo/cairo.inc | 12 +---
1
From: Xiaofeng Yan
pango run over x11 at current OE-core. If pango want to run over directfb, then
\
the configuration related to x11 should be disabled and directfb should be
enabled.
[YOCTO #1674]
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan
---
meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc | 19 +++
From: Xiaofeng Yan
Add demos for checking whether gtk+ run over directfb successfully or not.
[YOCTO #1674]
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan
---
meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+_2.24.6.bb |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+_2.24.6
From: Xiaofeng Yan
If x11 isn't in DISTRO_FEATURES, then an error information "no providers ..."
will \
arise. I modified this bb file to disable "dbus-x11" when no x11 in
DISTRO_FEATURES.
[YOCTO #1674]
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan
---
meta/recipes-gnome/gnome/gconf_3.2.3.bb |7 ++-
From: Xiaofeng Yan
Hi Saul,
I fix some problems you raised on the basis of previous submitting.
1 Ignore PR bumps for some recipes
There is no PR in gconf and I add it.
2 Add discription to directfb-examples and change its license.
I read README of directfb-examples and its license is MIT.
From: Xiaofeng Yan
gtk run over x11 at current OE-core. If gtk want to run over directfb, then \
the configuration related to x11 should be disabled and directfb should be
enabled.
[YOCTO #1674]
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan
---
meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+.inc | 20
1 f
From: Xiaofeng Yan
dbus-x11 could be not needed by an image without x11.
So I modified this bb file to enable dbus-x11 when x11 is in DISTRO_FEATURES
and disable \
dbus-x11 without x11 feature.
[YOCTO #1674]
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan
---
meta/recipes-bsp/qemu-config/qemu-config.bb |4 +
USER is the correct variable to use, also this can affect sstate
cache as well.
Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock
---
meta/conf/bitbake.conf |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
index 01f064c..cb70a49 100644
---
On 11/17/2011 02:36 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
USER is the correct variable to use, also this can affect sstate
cache as well.
Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock
---
I'm not 100% sure about this one but it seems like nothing is using this
variable?
Also one of my build machines (Jenkins speci
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 14:15 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Xiaofeng Yan
> wrote:
> > +++
> > b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim-1.4.4/makekeys_crosscompile.patch
> > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> > +Because the size of "unsigned long" is different between 32-bit
> > +an
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Xiaofeng Yan
wrote:
> +++
> b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim-1.4.4/makekeys_crosscompile.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +Because the size of "unsigned long" is different between 32-bit
> +and 64-bit, judge whether target is 32-bit or 64-bit and tell
> +"m
Op 23 nov. 2011, om 22:45 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Rainer Koenig
> wrote:
>> Am 09.11.2011 01:53, schrieb Joshua Lock:
>>> The freedesktop.org.xml is required when updating the mime database but
>>> otherwise not much use. Therefore package it se
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Rainer Koenig
wrote:
> Am 09.11.2011 01:53, schrieb Joshua Lock:
>> The freedesktop.org.xml is required when updating the mime database but
>> otherwise not much use. Therefore package it separately, rather than
>> removing it completely, so that it can be used as
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> Licence has update timestamp and Copyright year.
> This change needs a coresponding change to ASSUME_PROVIDED
> to add git-native
>
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
> ---
> .../gnu-config/config-guess-uclibc.patch | 145
> +---
Op 23 nov. 2011, om 20:36 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
> On 11/22/2011 11:37 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>> Op 23 nov. 2011, om 08:21 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> From: Xiaofeng Yan
>>>
>>> Change check sum of directfb. The previous check sum is wrong.
>>
>> Why
On 11/22/2011 10:47 PM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
From: Xiaofeng Yan
Hi Richard& all,
I fixed some problems found at previous submitting and use PACKAGECONFIG to get
mutual configuration between directfb and x11. I hope this submitting isn't a
horrible mess :).
One previous problem about what hap
On 11/22/2011 10:48 PM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
From: Xiaofeng Yan
Add this package for checking whether directfb run rightly or not.
It also is an useful tool to test directfb.
[YOCTO #1674]
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan
---
.../directfb/directfb-examples_1.2.0.bb| 18 ++
On 11/22/2011 11:37 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 23 nov. 2011, om 08:21 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende geschreven:
From: Xiaofeng Yan
Change check sum of directfb. The previous check sum is wrong.
Why is it wrong? What has changed?
Seems that when the recipe update occurred, the checksums whe
On 11/14/2011 03:41 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
Here are some updates for the distro_tracking.inc file for recipes that
require manual version checks.
The following changes since commit f2316ff39670ed99382411e15ac035550360fbdd:
opkg: Ensure we use the uname/gname fields when extracting tarballs
On 11/17/2011 03:13 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble
The following changes since commit 3b3bf4134fdec13d31d98af3cdb31a7111a05e35:
gmp: also generate the libgmpcxx library (2011-11-17 10:25:22 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.pokylinux.org/p
On 11/22/2011 05:10 AM, Shane Wang wrote:
Here are some updates for the distro_tracking.inc file for recipes that are
owned by Edwin and require manual version checks.
The following changes since commit 17a92c4c9801396ce6aa82f7c1532b49b18dbad4:
netbase: update 4.46 -> 4.47 (2011-11-21 18:4
On 11/22/2011 12:04 AM, Shane Wang wrote:
Here are some updates for the distro_tracking.inc file for recipes that are
owned by Dongxiao and require manual version checks.
The following changes since commit 17a92c4c9801396ce6aa82f7c1532b49b18dbad4:
netbase: update 4.46 -> 4.47 (2011-11-21 1
On 11/21/2011 10:24 PM, Shane Wang wrote:
Here are some updates for the distro_tracking.inc file for recipes that are
owned by Dexuan and require manual version checks.
The following changes since commit 17a92c4c9801396ce6aa82f7c1532b49b18dbad4:
netbase: update 4.46 -> 4.47 (2011-11-21 18:
Xorg VESA driver calls DGAInit enforcing this symbol to be available
to the driver to work so we revert back to only disable DGA for lite
flavor of Xorg.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
.../xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg-1.11.1.inc |2 +-
.../xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg-common.inc
The following changes since commit b7ffe94a17df389644bc216c56f4b339fcb06362:
distro_tracking_fields: Update after Manual Check (2011-11-23 16:14:19 +)
are available in the git repository at:
git://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core master
https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/tree/HEAD
Otavio
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 15:53, Phil Blundell wrote:
> ...
>
It's true that this will (in some sense) segment them into "new" and
> "old" features but it isn't going to be a hard, fixed division and I
> would expect that most DISTROs will do a fairly good job of keeping up
> to date with the newly
OpenEmbedded TSC Meeting 17-Nov-2011
Attended: Richard, Tom, Mark, Khem
Apologies: Koen
Minutes: Jefro
__
Agenda & results:
- pick a chairperson
fray
- collect open issues
--- revising TSC meeting time & day
[all] discuss on tsc ma
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 17:45 +, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> I think I'm right in assuming that when we introduce a DISTRO_FEATURES
> feature
> we are almost always doing it to allow disabling some existing functionality,
> rather than enabling something new.
I'm not sure that this is true. There
On Wednesday 23 November 2011 17:45:35 Paul Eggleton wrote:
> In that case, should we
> not be providing the appropriate mechanism so that can exclude the features
That should have been "...so that distros can...", sorry.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 02:11 -0600, Matthew McClintock wrote:
> This fixes the following issue:
>
> Log data follows:
> | NOTE: Creating RPM package for perf-dbg
> | NOTE: Creating RPM package for perf
> | NOTE: Creating EMPTY RPM Package for kernel
> | NOTE: Creating EMPTY RPM Package for kernel-3
On Wednesday 23 November 2011 17:09:08 Richard Purdie wrote:
> I'm wondering if we can do something in the core like:
>
> DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILLOPTS = "pulseaudio"
>
> and have the distro set:
>
> DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILLCONSIDERED = ""
>
> and then add some code which looks for anything in
>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:39 +, Julian Pidancet wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Julian Pidancet
>> wrote:
>> > This patch introduces a distro feature which enables gcc to produce
>> > both 32bit and 64bit code, and enables bin
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:48 +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:33 +, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 November 2011 16:59:56 Koen Kooi wrote:
> > > We also agreed that the current behaviour should be retained, so needing
> > > to
> > > add pulse to distro features w
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:33 +, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 November 2011 16:59:56 Koen Kooi wrote:
> > We also agreed that the current behaviour should be retained, so needing to
> > add pulse to distro features would go against that. Having said that, I
> > personally would dislike
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:39 +, Julian Pidancet wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Julian Pidancet
> wrote:
> > This patch introduces a distro feature which enables gcc to produce
> > both 32bit and 64bit code, and enables binutils to operate on both
> > 32bit and 64bit binaries. It diff
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Julian Pidancet
wrote:
> This patch introduces a distro feature which enables gcc to produce
> both 32bit and 64bit code, and enables binutils to operate on both
> 32bit and 64bit binaries. It differs from multilib toolchains in
> that it does not require to compil
On Wednesday 23 November 2011 16:59:56 Koen Kooi wrote:
> The phonon backends (e.g. gstreamer) are nicely modularized is the
> pulseaudio case different?
Unfortunately yes, since libphonon.so.* itself becomes linked to several
pulseaudio shared libraries when it is enabled at configure time.
> W
Op 23 nov. 2011, om 16:32 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
> The initial driver behind this series was a failure on our autobuilder,
> which resulted from qt4-x11-free detecting pulseaudio at configure time
> but then since it wasn't listed in DEPENDS, when it came to compile time
> p
Allow pulseaudio support to be disabled at a distro level rather than
always being enabled.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
.../gstreamer/gst-plugins-good_0.10.30.bb |8 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gst-pl
If pulseaudio is not in DISTRO_FEATURES then disable pulseaudio support
in phonon within Qt4; otherwise it auto-detects it and it may be enabled
or disabled depending on what gets built first.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta/recipes-qt/qt4/files/pulseaudio-config.patch | 44 +
This adds the ability to remove pulseaudio dependencies at the
distribution level.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta/conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc
b/meta/c
The initial driver behind this series was a failure on our autobuilder,
which resulted from qt4-x11-free detecting pulseaudio at configure time
but then since it wasn't listed in DEPENDS, when it came to compile time
pulseaudio happened to be unavailable and the build failed. Since
pulseaudio becom
I just wanted to give people who might be unaware a heads up on what I'm
trying to get done at the moment and why patches are moving a bit
slowly.
There have been a spate of rather ugly failures on the yocto autobuilder
and these are badly impacting our ability to feel happy about the state
of OE-
Op 23 nov. 2011, om 14:24 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
> On Tuesday 22 November 2011 18:25:25 Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Does it still suffer from the bug where it will break if you change machine
>> and something goes backward in PV (e.g. gcc 4.6 is used on arm, but 4.5 on
>> ppc)?
>
>
On Tuesday 22 November 2011 18:25:25 Koen Kooi wrote:
> Does it still suffer from the bug where it will break if you change machine
> and something goes backward in PV (e.g. gcc 4.6 is used on arm, but 4.5 on
> ppc)?
So unless I'm mistaken the fix that you yourself applied to OE in 2009 (and
whic
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 19:00 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 09:50 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> Gold defaults to no-add-needed thetefore
> >> it does not link with librtaries that are not on cmdline
> >> it needs libXrender
* Otavio Salvador [23 11:39]:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 18:36, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 06:34 AM, Anders Darander wrote:
> This updates busybox to the latest stable, 1.19.3.
> Among other things, there should be rudimentary support in syslogd for
> syste
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 18:36, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 06:34 AM, Anders Darander wrote:
>
>> This updates busybox to the latest stable, 1.19.3.
>>
>> Among other things, there should be rudimentary support in syslogd for
>> systemd, by enabling CONFIG_FEATURE_SYSTEMD.
>>
>> How much siz
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:55 -0800, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/gmp/gmp.inc
> b/meta/recipes-support/gmp/gmp.inc
> index 66349e6..10c3b9d 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-support/gmp/gmp.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/gmp/gmp.inc
> @@ -14,3 +14,7 @@ ARM_INSTRUCT
Without some sort of dependency on the HOST arch this "fake"
target package will be reused on a 32bit system even if it was
built on a 64bit system.
This new dependecy should prevent that from occuring.
Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock
---
Comments? I still this this is VERY BAD since it will t
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 11:59 -0800, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 04:18 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Nitin A Kamble
> >
> > The following changes since commit 7022a8f8045bdf82b9209b8cd62fb09c4a7a24f8:
> >
> >gcc-4.6: Fix gcc ICE on qt4-x11-free/armv7-a (2011-11-21 16:55:12 +0
On 2011年11月23日 02:50, Saul Wold wrote:
On 11/17/2011 03:16 AM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
From: Xiaofeng Yan
hen gtk+ configures, it should pick up ${NM} from the environment \
if it is defined, instead of just looking for "nm".
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan
---
.../gtk+/gtk+-2.24.6/configure-nm.patch
* Saul Wold [22 21:36]:
> On 11/22/2011 06:34 AM, Anders Darander wrote:
> > This updates busybox to the latest stable, 1.19.3.
> > Among other things, there should be rudimentary support in syslogd for
> > systemd, by enabling CONFIG_FEATURE_SYSTEMD.
> How much size does this add to busybox
On 2011?11?23? 15:31, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 23 nov. 2011, om 07:47 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende geschreven:
From: Xiaofeng Yan
Hi Richard& all,
I fixed some problems found at previous submitting and use PACKAGECONFIG to get
mutual configuration between directfb and x11. I hope this submitt
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 01:24 +, Daniel Lazzari wrote:
> I ran into an interesting problem today that I need some help with.
> I’m not sure if this is a bitbake issue or an oe-core one so I thought
> I’d try here first. We have our own layer that overlays on top of
> oe-core, meta-oe, and meta-an
This fixes the following issue:
Log data follows:
| NOTE: Creating RPM package for perf-dbg
| NOTE: Creating RPM package for perf
| NOTE: Creating EMPTY RPM Package for kernel
| NOTE: Creating EMPTY RPM Package for kernel-3.0.9-00348-gec4b357
| NOTE: Creating RPM package for kernel-image-3.0.9-003
On 11/23/2011 12:10 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 November 2011 00:01:58 Darren Hart wrote:
>> On 11/22/2011 11:36 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> One way:
>>>
>>> DEPENDS = "grub-efi-native"
>>> DEPENDS_virtclass-native = ""
>>
>> Ah, nice. I presume I can also zero out a function for the
On Wednesday 23 November 2011 00:01:58 Darren Hart wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 11:36 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > One way:
> >
> > DEPENDS = "grub-efi-native"
> > DEPENDS_virtclass-native = ""
>
> Ah, nice. I presume I can also zero out a function for the virtclass-native?
>
> do_compile_append() {
>
On 11/22/2011 11:36 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 23 nov. 2011, om 08:01 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
>
>> While working towards supporting efi boot in live images, I have been
>> refactoring bootimg.bbclass, syslinux.bbclass, and adding recipes and
>> classes for grub-efi.
>>
>> I'd
72 matches
Mail list logo
