Re: [OE-core] [PATCH meta-oe 3/9] libmad: Imported from OE-classic

2011-09-17 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 18 sep. 2011, om 07:55 heeft Joel A Fernandes het volgende geschreven: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Op 27 aug. 2011, om 06:12 heeft Joel A Fernandes het volgende geschreven: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Koen Kooi >>> wrote: Op 26 aug. 201

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH meta-oe 3/9] libmad: Imported from OE-classic

2011-09-17 Thread Joel A Fernandes
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 27 aug. 2011, om 06:12 heeft Joel A Fernandes het volgende geschreven: > >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Koen Kooi >> wrote: >>> >>> Op 26 aug. 2011, om 02:28 heeft Joel A Fernandes het volgende geschreven: diff --git a/meta-

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/5] kernel.bbclass: move uImage handling to separate task

2011-09-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
This was nack'ed but I don't remember why; Richard? On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 19:18, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > As per org.oe.dev and meta-oe's kernel.bbclass move uImage creation to > separate task from do_deploy. The only major feature of oe-core's > version (not to recreate uImage if it ex

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] kernel.bbclass: respect MACHINE_KERNEL_PR

2011-09-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 19:18, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > MACHINE_KERNEL_PR was introduced long ago in org.oe.dev. It's present in > meta-oe kernel.bbclass. Several machines depend on this functionality. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Acked-by: Otavio Salvador +1 -- Otavio

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] kernel.bbclass: blacklist 'perf-dbg' as well for the modules metapackage

2011-09-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
I have sent this in July and it was nacked. See at https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/commit/5c53cbf951a11ed92fb2ad0837991db256c11489 On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 19:18, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > --- >  meta/classes/kernel.

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] kernel.bbclass: handle .cis firmware

2011-09-17 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
.cis firmware files are used by kernel to patch incorrect CIS fir PCMCIA cards. Create respective packages. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/k

[OE-core] [PATCH 5/5] kernel.bbclass: remove unshipped files in do_install

2011-09-17 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Drop two unsed files (modules.order and modules.builtin) in do_install to stop the "unshipped files" warning. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classe

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] kernel.bbclass: blacklist 'perf-dbg' as well for the modules metapackage

2011-09-17 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass index bc1baa0..c577011 100644 --- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass +++

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] kernel.bbclass: respect MACHINE_KERNEL_PR

2011-09-17 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
MACHINE_KERNEL_PR was introduced long ago in org.oe.dev. It's present in meta-oe kernel.bbclass. Several machines depend on this functionality. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |5 + 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/5] kernel.bbclass: move uImage handling to separate task

2011-09-17 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
As per org.oe.dev and meta-oe's kernel.bbclass move uImage creation to separate task from do_deploy. The only major feature of oe-core's version (not to recreate uImage if it exists) is retained in this patch. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 40

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] initrd contamination and explict PATH

2011-09-17 Thread Darren Hart
On 09/16/2011 05:32 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 15:41 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >> I ran into a bit of a nasty issue where EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES set in my >> local.conf was causing core-image-initramfs to pull a bunch of files into >> my initrd, including bash and a 100+MB vmli

[OE-core] armv6-novfp and armv6-vfp and tune files

2011-09-17 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
hi, I've an HTC Dream, it has an armv6 CPU but lack a vfp unit. I want to add correct support for it in meta-smartphone/meta-htc. In order to have a correct machine config that works a tune inc file must be required in it. In openembedded-core there is no tune file yet for an armv6 that lacks a vf

Re: [OE-core] OE-Core release process

2011-09-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 06:06, Koen Kooi wrote: >> I don't see why it isn't reasonable. If they need a change done sooner >> than can be done by pushing it upstream, they can put it into a local >> layer until it makes it into oe-core. Seems simple enough to me. > > Furthermore, poky is the only d

Re: [OE-core] OE-Core release process

2011-09-17 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 17 sep. 2011, om 04:55 heeft Chris Larson het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> Yes I know but wouldn't be better if you could base your work on >>> oe-core and avoid doing this? >> >> For submitting to oe-core for pull requests, basing work off o