Re: [OE-core] Parsing error when adding a python function in .inc file

2011-03-24 Thread Graham Gower
On 25 March 2011 03:04, Khem Raj wrote: > On (23/03/11 20:45), Khem Raj wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am facing a strange problem. I am trying to add a small python function to >> qemu.inc and bitbake keeps telling me this >> >> NOTE: Out of date cache found, rebuilding... >> ERROR: Error parsing >> /home

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Split IMAGE* variables into a separate class

2011-03-24 Thread Tom Rini
On 03/24/2011 08:39 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 24 mrt 2011, om 15:49 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: From: Richard Purdie These patches split the IMAGE* variables out into a separate class to improve readabilty. I like it! Agreed. This will help us clean up the N instances of

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] linux-yocto: update to v2.6.37.5

2011-03-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
I missed 2.6.37.4 when I was away for a week, so now that 2.6.37.5 is out, we can grab both of them a single update. As the patch indicates, I built and booted this on all the relevant qemu targets. This is against meta master, if I've got it in the wrong place, just let know. Pull URL: git://gi

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto: update to 2.6.37.5

2011-03-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
The 2.6.37.5 -stable update is available, so it now becomes the new base for linux-yocto. All qemu targets have been built and booted. Changelog is available via: git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit v2.6.37.3..v2.6.37.5 Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- .../conf/distro/include/poky-de

Re: [OE-core] Parsing error when adding a python function in .inc file

2011-03-24 Thread Khem Raj
On (23/03/11 20:45), Khem Raj wrote: > Hi > > I am facing a strange problem. I am trying to add a small python function to > qemu.inc and bitbake keeps telling me this > > NOTE: Out of date cache found, rebuilding... > ERROR: Error parsing > /home/kraj/work/newoe/sources/openembedded-core/meta/r

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Split IMAGE* variables into a separate class

2011-03-24 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 24 mrt 2011, om 15:49 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > From: Richard Purdie > > These patches split the IMAGE* variables out into a separate class > to improve readabilty. I like it! ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] image_types.bbclass: Drop IMAGE_EXTRA_OPTION in favour of the more standard EXTRA_IMAGECMD

2011-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
From: Richard Purdie Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- meta/classes/image_types.bbclass | 13 + meta/conf/bitbake.conf |3 --- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass b/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass index 5c9

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] bitbake.conf/image.bbclass: Move image type information into image_types.bbclass

2011-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
From: Richard Purdie Image generation code in .conf files is hard to read as it needs to be single line. By moving this to a separate class, multiline functions can be used instead improving readability. It also declutters bitbake.conf. There is no real functional change with this patch but it h

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Split IMAGE* variables into a separate class

2011-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
From: Richard Purdie These patches split the IMAGE* variables out into a separate class to improve readabilty. The patch descriptions themselves have the details. Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib Branch: rpurdie/imagetypes Browse: http://git.openembedded.org/cg

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] recipes-efl inside meta-oe or meta-efl next to meta-oe?

2011-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 10:26 +, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 07:49:27AM +, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:27:28AM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > Have either of you ever tried to explain some of the concepts we're > > > dealing with to people who a

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] recipes-efl inside meta-oe or meta-efl next to meta-oe?

2011-03-24 Thread Joshua Lock
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 07:49 +, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:27:28AM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > Have either of you ever tried to explain some of the concepts we're > > dealing with to people who aren't deeply engaged engineers? > > > Yes, everytime I apply for a new

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] recipes-efl inside meta-oe or meta-efl next to meta-oe?

2011-03-24 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 07:49:27AM +, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:27:28AM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > Have either of you ever tried to explain some of the concepts we're > > dealing with to people who aren't deeply engaged engineers? > > > Yes, everytime I apply for

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] recipes-efl inside meta-oe or meta-efl next to meta-oe?

2011-03-24 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 24 mrt 2011, om 08:49 heeft Graeme Gregory het volgende geschreven: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:27:28AM +, Richard Purdie wrote: >> Have either of you ever tried to explain some of the concepts we're >> dealing with to people who aren't deeply engaged engineers? >> > Yes, everytime I app

[OE-core] [PATCH] gnutls: add BBCLASSEXTEND = native

2011-03-24 Thread koen
From: Koen Kooi This is needed for the native recipes in meta-efl Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi --- meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls.inc |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls.inc b/meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls.inc index

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] recipes-efl inside meta-oe or meta-efl next to meta-oe?

2011-03-24 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:27:28AM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > Have either of you ever tried to explain some of the concepts we're > dealing with to people who aren't deeply engaged engineers? > Yes, everytime I apply for a new job/contract getting quite used to explaining it. > Having a model