+--On 20 mai 2011 09:08:56 + Alex Dalitz wrote:
| Can you please try svn r5144?
That stopped the auditor from complaining with that zone, and it did not
start complaining with the hundred+ other zones that I have, so, good for
me :-)
--
Mathieu Arnold
___
Can you please try svn r5144?
Thanks!
Alex.
On 18 May 2011, at 12:24, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a mostly delegation zone (notaires.fr) with the following excerpt
> (all that concerns paris.notaires.fr is in there) :
>
> paris.notaires.fr.86400 IN MX
+--On 18 mai 2011 14:49:04 +0200 Mathieu Arnold wrote:
| +--On 18 mai 2011 14:25:57 +0200 Göran Bengtson
| wrote:
|| On Wed, 18 May 2011, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
||> Have I uncovered a bug, or is there something wrong I can't see ?
||
|| Just for the record. I've seen this too with 1.2.1 for a z
+--On 18 mai 2011 14:25:57 +0200 Göran Bengtson wrote:
| On Wed, 18 May 2011, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
|> Have I uncovered a bug, or is there something wrong I can't see ?
|
| Just for the record. I've seen this too with 1.2.1 for a zone wih >3
| RRs
| but I have not yet isolated it in a smaller
On Wed, 18 May 2011, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
From: Mathieu Arnold
To: "opendnssec-user@lists.opendnssec.org"
Message-ID: <33bbafbca75f7c7b08516...@ogg.in.absolight.net>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 13:24:56 +0200
Subject: [Opendnssec-user] problem with the auditor when upgrading f
Hi,
I have a mostly delegation zone (notaires.fr) with the following excerpt
(all that concerns paris.notaires.fr is in there) :
paris.notaires.fr.86400 IN MX 50
mta1a.mail.zscaler.net.
paris.notaires.fr.86400 IN MX 50
mta1b.mail