berry,
thanks for response
> - No narrow down my research, is this based on a MySQL database?
> - Does the problem persist, i.e. does this message keep or appearing?
not in the last days, but did get
Feb 16 20:38:26 rap ods-enforcerd[676]: [keystate_list_task] unknown arguments
for key lis
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:56 AM Roman Serbski wrote:
>
> Actually, the key from my initial email has never been purged from the HSM:
>
> %ods-hsmutil list | grep f30eafaf208d0cab57cda29a75b62820
> SoftHSM f30eafaf208d0cab57cda29a75b62820 RSA/1024
Sorry, I was too quick with conclu
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:55 AM (Berry) A.W. van Halderen via
Opendnssec-user wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 01:43:09PM -0800, Randy Bush via Opendnssec-user
> wrote:
> > opendnssec version 2.1.7
> > softhsm 1.3.8
> >
> > Feb 8 20:07:33 rap ods-enforcerd[676]: [enforcer] update:
> > key_dat
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 01:43:09PM -0800, Randy Bush via Opendnssec-user wrote:
> opendnssec version 2.1.7
> softhsm 1.3.8
>
> Feb 8 20:07:33 rap ods-enforcerd[676]: [enforcer] update: key_data_update()
> failed
>
> goog gives no hits for key_data_update() failed
>
I've had one report earlier
Roman Serbski via Opendnssec-user writes:
Among others things:
>
> I see that the new 2.1.8 has been released yesterday which mentions a
> fix to keys not being purged from the HSM, although I'm not sure it's
> our case.
To prevent possible confusion, let me clarify. A release candidate
(2.1
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:08 PM Randy Bush via Opendnssec-user
wrote:
>
> opendnssec version 2.1.7
> softhsm 1.3.8
>
> Feb 8 20:07:33 rap ods-enforcerd[676]: [enforcer] update: key_data_update()
> failed
>
> goog gives no hits for key_data_update() failed
>
> clue bat, please?
Hello,
Same here
opendnssec version 2.1.7
softhsm 1.3.8
Feb 8 20:07:33 rap ods-enforcerd[676]: [enforcer] update: key_data_update()
failed
goog gives no hits for key_data_update() failed
clue bat, please?
randy
___
Opendnssec-user mailing list
Opendnssec-user@lists.
