Re: [Opendnssec-user] Set a very low TTL for a label

2013-12-19 Thread Volker Janzen
Hi, I'm running 1.4.3 and have one test record with 60 seconds TTL. The RRSIG has a TTL of 60, too. Seems to work in this version, too. Volker ___ Opendnssec-user mailing list Opendnssec-user@lists.opendnssec.org https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/l

Re: [Opendnssec-user] Set a very low TTL for a label

2013-12-19 Thread Matthijs Mekking
Hi, On 12/19/2013 02:04 PM, Ondřej Caletka wrote: > Hi, > > Dne 19.12.2013 11:27, Matthijs Mekking napsal(a): >> Something like that is not possible: All NSEC3 records TTL will be set >> to SOA minimum value without exceptions. But if you only going to change >> the record (not removing or adding

Re: [Opendnssec-user] Set a very low TTL for a label

2013-12-19 Thread Ondřej Caletka
Hi, Dne 19.12.2013 11:27, Matthijs Mekking napsal(a): > Something like that is not possible: All NSEC3 records TTL will be set > to SOA minimum value without exceptions. But if you only going to change > the record (not removing or adding names), you don't need to worry about > the NSEC3 records T

Re: [Opendnssec-user] Set a very low TTL for a label

2013-12-19 Thread Matthijs Mekking
Hi, On 12/19/2013 10:15 AM, Ondřej Caletka wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using OpenDNSSEC 1.3.2. I'm trying to set a very low TTL (like 60) > for one label in the zone (the IP address is going to change and I want > to minimize downtime). I noticed, that in the signed file, all TTLs are > clamped to the S

[Opendnssec-user] Set a very low TTL for a label

2013-12-19 Thread Ondřej Caletka
Hi, I'm using OpenDNSSEC 1.3.2. I'm trying to set a very low TTL (like 60) for one label in the zone (the IP address is going to change and I want to minimize downtime). I noticed, that in the signed file, all TTLs are clamped to the SOA minimum value set in KASP. When I lowered that value, all RR