Yes, that is in the time plan. But first we need to get the
fundamental PKCS#11 support in place for SoftHSM v2. Then we have the
issue: https://issues.opendnssec.org/browse/SOFTHSM-9
It is my personal preference to keep the documentation up to date,
eve during development. I've s
We're running version 1.3.3 of opendnssec at the moment and I've just
notice that we've been getting these messages appear in our
/var/log/messages:
Nov 23 14:38:09 hostnamer ods-signerd: [fifo] max cap reached, but drudgers
seem to be on hold, notify drudgers again
I did a Google search to t
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
>
> I have now increased the required version to 1.10.0. Because the 1.9.*
> was the development release for 1.10.
>
> You probably want that to be documented in the README as well.
Yes, that is in the time plan. But first we need to ge
Hi all,
We have moved to a new issue tracker (JIRA) and wiki (Confluence) for the
OpenDNSSEC (and SoftHSM) project.
You can find the new wiki here: https://wiki.opendnssec.org/ .
And the new issue tracker can be found here: https://issues.opendnssec.org/ .
Information about reporting bugs in t
I have now increased the required version to 1.10.0. Because the 1.9.*
was the development release for 1.10.
You probably want that to be documented in the README as well.
jaap
___
Opendnssec-user mailing list
Opendnssec-user@li
