Silicos NV is pleased to announce the release of its open source
online application tool called ProfiLIB, built on top of the Open
Babel 2.3.0 C++ library and incorporating many of Silicos' open source
programs. ProfiLIB is an online application tool that can be accessed
from the Silicos we
Dear,
My name is NGUYEN Thanh Binh. I am working about the SMARTS parsing.
I have used the library OPENBABEL to do it.
But i have a problem that needs your help. My following problem is :
When i have constructed SMARTS Formulas in order to parse and to count the
fonctional groups for the alpha al
Did you try the SmartsViewer? http://smartsview.zbh.uni-hamburg.de/
Can you give an example molecule (SMILES) where you do not get the
expected result?
- Noel
On 23 February 2011 10:16, NGUYEN Thanh Binh wrote:
> Dear,
>
> My name is NGUYEN Thanh Binh. I am working about the SMARTS parsing.
> I
Hi again,
Could you please send a small list of SMILES and the expected result along with
your code so that we can see what's happening. Please also cc the list.
Kind regards,
Fredrik
24 feb 2011 kl. 10.45 skrev NGUYEN Thanh Binh:
> Thank you very much Mr. Fredrik. It is exactly my problem. Ho
What was your expected result for Ethylene? And how did you do the search. I'm
guessing that you want Ethylene to report two CH2= groups, but since your
SMARTS matches both atoms in Ethylene, you will only get one result from
findall(), namely [(1, 2)]. The other hit would be identical and is th
Hi again,
On looking at the Pybel code for findall I thought that what you probably want
is to use the openbabel backbone and call GetMapList instead of GetUMapList as
findall() does. However, that didn't work either for me (the result was still
only 1 set of atoms). I also tried MatchesSMARTS
Hi again,
I am preparing a file for you , but now it is not important. Indeed, i have
used Findall() but unsuccessfully yet. Anyway, thank you very much.
Best regards,
T-B
2011/2/24 Fredrik Wallner
> Hi again,
>
> On looking at the Pybel code for findall I thought that what you probably
> wa