> So 3.0.8 should be working, right ?
You'll need to make sure the entire bindings are re-built (e.g., with javac in
this case). But yes, I suspect the problem is that there's an older version of
the bindings present, using SWIG2.
-Geoff
Hi,
On Fr, 2016-11-11 at 11:29 -0500, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote:
> >
...
> > Apparently, the shared object has been found but the symbol
> > new_OBConversion__SWIG_2() is missing in the shared object?
> Out of curiosity, what version of SWIG are you using? I'm wondering
> if there's a mismatch her
Hello,
I use the SWIG version 3.0.8.
Best regards, Jördis
Am Fr, 11. Nov, 2016 um 5:29 schrieb Geoffrey Hutchison
:
I want to use the Java Interface of OpenBabel, so i compiled it
with -DJAVA_BINDINGS=ON.
I include the generated openbabel.jar into my Java Project. My
example Java file cont
Hi,
I use SWIG version 3.0.8
Thanks, Jördis
--
View this message in context:
http://forums.openbabel.org/OBConversion-in-Open-Babel-version-2-4-1-tp4659562p4659584.html
Sent from the General discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
> I want to use the Java Interface of OpenBabel, so i compiled it with
> -DJAVA_BINDINGS=ON.
> I include the generated openbabel.jar into my Java Project. My example Java
> file contains something like that:
...
> Apparently, the shared object has been found but the symbol
> new_OBConversion__SW
