Re: [Open Babel] Canonical SMILES with disconnected parts

2017-05-27 Thread Geoff Hutchison
No, this is a known bug with disconnected fragments. The canonical algorithm does not canonicalize the fragments. Geoff > On May 27, 2017, at 4:20 AM, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > > Should be the same. Can you provide the files? > >> On 27 May 2017 12:51 a.m., "xh s" wrote: >> In my program I conve

Re: [Open Babel] Canonical SMILES with disconnected parts

2017-05-27 Thread Noel O'Boyle
Should be the same. Can you provide the files? On 27 May 2017 12:51 a.m., "xh s" wrote: > In my program I convert the molecule ClCCl.O.[Cl-] (from both SMILES and > OBMol) to canonical SMILES but get two different answers, ClCCl.O.[Cl-] and > ClCCl.[Cl-].O > > My question is, is the order of dis