Re: [Open Babel] Bindings - first and last molecule option

2013-12-04 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
> This only proves, that I really want to use it. Is the proof.py script > working correctly for anybody (attached in previous mail)? It should ouptut > molecules no. 5-10 out of 100 in proof.sdf No, it doesn't work. % python proof.py | wc 100 1001300 Hmm. Chris, any idea why this

Re: [Open Babel] stereo config question

2013-12-04 Thread Tim Vandermeersch
The ability to determine CIP rules is a nice feature to have but not really necessary for most cheminformatics applications. If someone donates this code it would certainly be considered a valuable addition. I rewrote most of the sterochemistry code for OB a few years ago and never got around to im

Re: [Open Babel] stereo config question

2013-12-04 Thread Yoel
Ana this is great! Thanks so much for letting us take peek! I'll take a closer look later. Best wishes Yoel -- View this message in context: http://forums.openbabel.org/stereo-config-question-tp4656879p4657016.html Sent from the General discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---

Re: [Open Babel] stereo config question

2013-12-04 Thread Ana Teixeira
Hi all, Interesting discussion. I have been facing this problem recently and I did not know that RDKit could do it. I developed an algorithm to classify stereocenters as R/S and double bonds as E/Z using CIP rules and the information provided by openbabel. There is only one CIP rule that for

Re: [Open Babel] stereo config question

2013-12-04 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 2013-12-03 22:28, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote: > Craig's point is not that CIP is impossible, but rather from a practical implementation side, it's easier to use other local stereo designations. I might be wrong, but the codes that I can think of with CIP implementations are all commercial, and as

Re: [Open Babel] stereo config question

2013-12-04 Thread Craig James
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Yoel wrote: > Thanks Noel, > > Sure I agree and thanks for answering the original question. For > Dimitri and I that are looking for assigning R and S your original > answer was also the correct one since this winding property bears no > relation to R/S because the

Re: [Open Babel] stereo config question

2013-12-04 Thread Yoel
Thanks Noel, Sure I agree and thanks for answering the original question. For Dimitri and I that are looking for assigning R and S your original answer was also the correct one since this winding property bears no relation to R/S because there are no guarantees that atom 1 is the smallest in prior

Re: [Open Babel] Bindings - first and last molecule option

2013-12-04 Thread Maciek Wójcikowski
This only proves, that I really want to use it. Is the proof.py script working correctly for anybody (attached in previous mail)? It should ouptut molecules no. 5-10 out of 100 in proof.sdf Pozdrawiam, | Best regards, Maciek Wójcikowski mac...@wojcikowski.pl 2013/12/3 Chris Morley > > O

Re: [Open Babel] stereo config question

2013-12-04 Thread Noel O'Boyle
Let me just answer the original question as this is getting somewhat out of hand. :-) Open Babel stores tetrahedral stereochemistry in a Config object. A typical Config object associated with a tetrahedral center may have the following fields and values: winding: "Clockwise" center: 2 from: 1 refs