https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363776
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan ---
Created attachment 104034
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104034&action=edit
PDF that demonstrates bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363776
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan ---
Created attachment 104035
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104035&action=edit
Screen capture video demonstrating bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363776
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan ---
I just reproduced the problem once again using Okular from Debian/unstable.
I've attached a copy of the PDF and a screen capture video to demonstrate. The
important bit to notice is at 0:22 after I choose
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363776
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan ---
Created attachment 104037
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104037&action=edit
Patch to fix problem
It's not very elegant, but this patch solves the problem. It does this by
creatin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363776
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan ---
Comment on attachment 104443
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104443
Alberts patch to fix the problem
Sure that is a simple and effective solution to this bug. However it does
nothing for two identif
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363776
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan ---
I beg to differ. The failure to set d->mousePressPos is a direct consequence of
handling this particular click differently from every other one. So although
the patch removes one obvious malfunction, it is one m
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419394
Bug ID: 419394
Summary: Provide an easy way to extract an image from a pdf
Product: okular
Version: 1.9.3
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: wi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419394
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan ---
Created attachment 127096
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=127096&action=edit
pdf containing an image
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361538
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan ---
Still happens to me, at least with Okular version 1.11.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314981
Bug ID: 314981
Summary: active-documentviewer desktop files are installed even
if app is not built
Classification: Unclassified
Product: okular
Version: 0.16.60
Platform: Comp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155515
Jonathan Doman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.do...@gmail.com
--- Comment #57 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155515
--- Comment #62 from Jonathan Doman ---
Thank you for your feedback. I had not considered the case presented in #58. I
will take these comments into consideration and open a review request when I
think the tabs behave reasonably.
--
You are receiving
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
1708501daaef817a1ce35fa5d96701a66ab66983
shell/shell.rc 93fbc417588312792bab39b693c65e5d414c87c6
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https
stals Cid wrote:
> Hello? Is anyone there?
Sorry, I thought you meant nobody was going to look at it for six months.
- Jonathan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git
f. But basically, I had to do this for it to work
on my computer. I'll go back again to see if it works without changing the
names.
- Jonathan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewb
; > people where using.
It seems my experiences were caused by a bug/feature in qdbusviewer
(https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-6943). So, while technically
it's okay to keep the interface names how they are, it makes more sense
1708501daaef817a1ce35fa5d96701a66ab66983
shell/shell.rc 93fbc417588312792bab39b693c65e5d414c87c6
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo
t we're trying to add good practices :-)
Do you want everything as const as possible? For example, there are places I
can do "const Type* const" but I think "Type*" or "const Type*" is cleaner. How
about function parameters (int vs const int)?
- Jonathan
---
1708501daaef817a1ce35fa5d96701a66ab66983
shell/shell.rc 93fbc417588312792bab39b693c65e5d414c87c6
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https
to open as a new tab in an existing window. So
without --new, the Detach Tab feature wouldn't work. Unless you want to change
the default behavior, --new has to come in at the same time.
- Jonathan
---
gt; for anything other than for calling unregisterObject, is this something
> > stale from old changes?
>
> Jonathan Doman wrote:
> I accidentally removed the initialization in the last update. I believe
> it's necessary so that closed tabs don't show up in DBus.
>
&g
1708501daaef817a1ce35fa5d96701a66ab66983
shell/shell.rc 93fbc417588312792bab39b693c65e5d414c87c6
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo
gt; > "if (part)" instead of "if (part != 0)"
> >
> > and
> >
> > "if (!part)" instead of "if (part == 0)"
Is there a coding guidelines document that you follow? It seems many of my
preferences are contrary
gt; for anything other than for calling unregisterObject, is this something
> > stale from old changes?
>
> Jonathan Doman wrote:
> I accidentally removed the initialization in the last update. I believe
> it's necessary so that closed tabs don't show up in DBus.
>
&g
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155515
--- Comment #67 from Jonathan Doman ---
The code is ready to merge from my perspective, but we are still working
through the review stage. Unfortunately, we have not really gotten into any
discussion about the UI design decisions yet, and I suspect the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325745
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Riddell ---
Created attachment 82703
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=82703&action=edit
the eps file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325745
Bug ID: 325745
Summary: EPS file does not scale
Classification: Unclassified
Product: okular
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
ndows, and it would still be possible in
this code to manually open the same document to get it in another tab. Is that
going to be blocked in the future? If not, I don't see how duplication causes
any additional problems.
Do you agree with the logic t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327958
Bug ID: 327958
Summary: okular-gv.png wrong size
Classification: Unclassified
Product: okular
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
/jrmrjnck/okular-tabbed
Diffs (updated)
-
shell/shell.cpp 1708501daaef817a1ce35fa5d96701a66ab66983
shell/shell.h c065c560fb4ddfcf181601cf35e9ca14581731f6
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
n that okularpart knows the
> > mimetype once it opens the file, i'd prefer a signal beign emmited instead
> > another KMimeType call.
Is KMimeType expensive? Are you suggesting that I add a new signal to
Okular::Part?
- Jonathan
--
t; > setting so people were not forced to use tabs if they don't like them
>
> Jonathan Doman wrote:
> Where should the interface for this setting be?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Settings -> Configure -> General -> Program features looks good to me.
/shell.cpp 1708501daaef817a1ce35fa5d96701a66ab66983
shell/shell.rc 93fbc417588312792bab39b693c65e5d414c87c6
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
t; > setting so people were not forced to use tabs if they don't like them
>
> Jonathan Doman wrote:
> Where should the interface for this setting be?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Settings -> Configure -> General -> Program features looks good to me.
/shell.h c065c560fb4ddfcf181601cf35e9ca14581731f6
shell/shell.cpp 1708501daaef817a1ce35fa5d96701a66ab66983
shell/shell.rc 93fbc417588312792bab39b693c65e5d414c87c6
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
might be some kind of policy.
> On Jan. 12, 2014, 9:57 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > shell/shell.cpp, line 256
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/9/?file=233820#file233820line256>
> >
> > space here
Are you sure? Most config keys (in
/shell.rc 93fbc417588312792bab39b693c65e5d414c87c6
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
> you want one check there shouldn't you be doing something like
> > activeTab < m_tabs.size?
> >
> > But this can't happen, no?
>
> Jonathan Doman wrote:
> Yes, you are right. I was specifically trying to change the code as
> litt
and hidden. For some reason, the static
initialization is necessary. If I can figure out how to build kdelibs, I can
dig deeper, but this isn't directly related to my tabs code.
- Jonathan
---
This is an automatical
o tab 1
> > * Go to tab 2
> > * Press Esc
> > * Search bar does not close
> >
>
> Jonathan Doman wrote:
> As you may have noticed, the problem is that the Part::m_closeFindBar
> action loses its shortcut (Key_Escape) after switching tabs. However, I can
/shell.rc 93fbc417588312792bab39b693c65e5d414c87c6
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
> >
> > -
> > +
> >
> >&Help
> >
> >
> > fixes the settings menubar jumping issue?
Yeah, that seems to keep everything in order. Should I add that to this patch?
- Jonathan
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219121
Jonathan Doman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.do...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from
93fbc417588312792bab39b693c65e5d414c87c6
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110914/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
> On Feb. 8, 2014, 3:14 p.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Thanks for this feature, Jonathan!
> >
> > I just tried Okular from master, and noticed that QTabWidget adds a frame
> > around the page view. Is using QTabWidget::setDocumentMode(false) an
> > option,
: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115636/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
remove the frame.
Diffs
-
shell/shell.cpp 822615351a91386c51dad4f4afe67db53c3ec97d
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115636/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331872
Jonathan Doman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.do...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331872
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Doman ---
Okay, I'm not an official developer but I'll try to implement this and get it
reviewed. How would you expect this to behave when there are multiple okular
windows already opened? Should it open a new
27608e5
shell/shell.h 3b9aae061cd6be0c7a86c885fc06d00d9275bd50
shell/main.cpp e0ca587ba167c4020d5af5bd33a2dc1b4923cac4
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116700/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330991
Jonathan Doman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.do...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from
> On March 17, 2014, 4:29 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Does this also solve drag&drop as described in
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332238 ?
No, I have avoided modifying the part/pageview.
- Jonathan
---
> On March 17, 2014, 4:29 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Does this also solve drag&drop as described in
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332238 ?
>
> Jonathan Doman wrote:
> No, I have avoided modifying the part/pageview.
>
> Albert Astals
gt; > traverse all the dbus services.
> >
Measurements on my computer shows that the search (querying up to 5 open
windows) takes only 2-5 ms total. The second half (calling openDocument) takes
at least 50 ms per doc since it waits for everything to load. That could be
made asynchr
> On March 17, 2014, 4:29 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Does this also solve drag&drop as described in
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332238 ?
>
> Jonathan Doman wrote:
> No, I have avoided modifying the part/pageview.
>
> Albert Astals
llows a window that was originally
non-tabbed to change that setting and then handle multiple docs without
restarting (or the other way around).
I think the current logic results in more intuitive behavior, but you may
disagree.
- Jonathan
-
0d9275bd50
part.cpp 4ce7e28e1071772921e6292e61a88c905a62d7f6
part.h 010e9de1f2b5c27531a48b943d821ccc3f3f7205
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116700/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
30940b27b727608e5
shell/shell.h 3b9aae061cd6be0c7a86c885fc06d00d9275bd50
part.cpp 4ce7e28e1071772921e6292e61a88c905a62d7f6
shell/main.cpp e0ca587ba167c4020d5af5bd33a2dc1b4923cac4
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116700/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
pageview.cpp dd4199450672c18ebfa146327d8e9b7eb034ddc8
ui/sidebar.h 036d7788096366d6bab7d7f2a41d55b7a31d303a
ui/pageview.h 577b908633bd0778df33d0a15961ab16071a1500
ui/thumbnaillist.cpp 72b557e6624e8229cf1e5e4c5dc69ed77fec54cb
Diff: https://git.reviewboa
debar.h 036d7788096366d6bab7d7f2a41d55b7a31d303a
ui/pageview.h 577b908633bd0778df33d0a15961ab16071a1500
ui/thumbnaillist.cpp 72b557e6624e8229cf1e5e4c5dc69ed77fec54cb
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116700/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-dev
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334019
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Doman ---
I'm happy to implement this, but it may be a month before I have time to do it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
O
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334018
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Doman ---
I'm happy to implement this, but it may be a month before I have time to do it.
It's really just one line of code, but there are a few other tab improvements
I'd like to do at the same time.
--
Yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334100
Jonathan Doman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.do...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334251
Bug ID: 334251
Summary: Tools don't work if any tab is in review mode
Classification: Unclassified
Product: okular
Version: 0.19.0
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118685/diff/
Testing
---
Tested that the GUI remains coherent when moving two tabs around many times. As
before, the tool selections aren't quite coherent, but that's for another patch.
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Ok
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335852
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Doman ---
Okay, got it. I'm settled in a new city now, so I'll put up patches as fast as
you can review them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
not expose the underlying tab bar.
Personally, I find this simpler than subclassing KTabWidget or using
KTabBar+QStackedLayout.
- Jonathan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewbo
abWidget is a QTabWidget and is setting its tabbar with
> >
> > setTabBar( new KTabBar( this ) );
> >
> > so how would QTabWidget::tabBar not return something valid?
That function is protected. I would have
abWidget is a QTabWidget and is setting its tabbar with
> >
> > setTabBar( new KTabBar( this ) );
> >
> > so how would QTabWidget::tabBar not return something valid?
>
> Jonathan Doman wrote:
> That function is protected. I would have to
. As
before, the tool selections aren't quite coherent, but that's for another patch.
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
, the tool selections aren't quite coherent, but that's for another patch.
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
bff51
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119550/diff/
Testing
---
Tested steps described in bug report.
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
shell/main.cpp d2e0ec72fd43b560d25ac7f903462641cdbbff51
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119550/diff/
Testing
---
Tested steps described in bug report.
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334510
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Doman ---
Thanks for the tip, Willem. The patch is posted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel
Testing
---
Tested steps described in bug report.
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
ments are
made absolute.
Diffs
-
shell/main.cpp d2e0ec72fd43b560d25ac7f903462641cdbbff51
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119550/diff/
Testing
---
Tested steps described in bug report.
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338088
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338088
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Verner ---
Thanks for clarifying. Online discussion has the drawback that one can't see
non-verbal hints and without them, as I said, your second sentence sounded
a bit harsh to me :-)
As for the feature, I won'
code looks good to me.
- Jonathan Doman
On Aug. 3, 2014, 3 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334251
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Doman ---
I took some time to look at this and I'm not sure how to fix it. The problem is
that changing the mouse mode writes the global Settings, which triggers all the
Parts to reload (and potentially overwrite
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334251
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Doman ---
So I tested an older version (tag v4.10.97) and this bug exists for multiple
windows as well. It's probably been around forever. And there are similar bugs
for other settings like continuous view mode. Basica
diff/
Testing
---
Followed steps in bug report for both tabs and windows to make sure different
tools are allowed.
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329740
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341118
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341244
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
ui/pageview.cpp 17e66f4a3b420bbcaf281532fa9d84379c74d48c
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120660/diff/
Testing
---
Followed steps in bug report for both tabs and windows to make sure different
tools are allowed.
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342548
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343101
Jonathan Verner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ver...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335852
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Doman ---
I'm trying to work on this bug but hitting some roadblocks due to the Part
plugin design. The Shell needs to get and set some information on each Part
(the viewport), and this can't really be done usi
ingle window with tabs enabled.
- Restore multiple windows, tabs enabled or disabled.
- Restore session config describing multible tabs, even though tabs are disabled
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
> On Feb. 16, 2015, 4:43 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > How much work would be to add to autotests the manual tests you mention?
No idea, never written qt tests before. I'll take a look.
- Jonathan
---
This is an
save the viewport, but the code became very
complicated, and I couldn't get it working anyway. The viewport is already
saved during a normal close, so I will try to figure out how to invoke the same
logic during a session shut down.
- Jonathan
-
think is how
KDE does it behind the scenes.
- Restore one or more documents in single window with tabs enabled.
- Restore multiple windows, tabs enabled or disabled.
- Restore session config describing multible tabs, even though tabs are disabled
Thank
ibing multible tabs, even though tabs are disabled
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
eApplication::quit() I
think). This just causes app.exec() to return - windows are not closed nor are
destructors called. So the only way to respond is to connect to aboutToQuit.
Just in case this changes in the future, we can clear the tab list in slotQuit
so that it's okay to call
tiple windows, tabs enabled or disabled.
- Restore session config describing multible tabs, even though tabs are disabled
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
Restore session config describing multible tabs, even though tabs are disabled
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
abled.
- Restore session config describing multible tabs, even though tabs are disabled
Thanks,
Jonathan Doman
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
1 - 100 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
