https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186531
--- Comment #9 from Marius Kotsbak ---
What do you think about this then:
"I confirmed this is the case, so ... there's this function "isWhite" in
utils.cpp which isn't used anywhere else than in Utils::imageBoundingBox.
I modified it from
inline sta
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65538
Lars Heineken changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |REMIND
--- Comment #5 from Lars Heineken ---
Ba
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65538
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|REMIND
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65538
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65538
Lars Heineken changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188239
--- Comment #4 from Frédéric COIFFIER ---
Created attachment 77951
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=77951&action=edit
TwoColumnLeft layout example
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188239
--- Comment #5 from Frédéric COIFFIER ---
Created attachment 77952
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=77952&action=edit
TwoColumnRight layout example
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188239
Frédéric COIFFIER changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frederic.coiff...@free.fr
--- Comment #6 fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159601
Marcin Szamotulski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mszamot@accorda-institute.o
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316549
Bug ID: 316549
Summary: Undo and save problem
Classification: Unclassified
Product: okular
Version: 0.14.3
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108614/#review28857
---
Seems more appropriate for me. But one more thing, is reg1 stil
> On March 10, 2013, 12:27 a.m., Azat Khuzhin wrote:
> > Seems more appropriate for me. But one more thing, is reg1 still needed?
>
> Jaydeep Solanki wrote:
> Yes, because it prevents "asdfhttp://www.google.com"; from getting
> detected.
I think that for this it is not necessary.
Because o
> On March 9, 2013, 4:12 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I am not sure this is the totally correct fix (I'm not saying the code we
> > have now is better). But i do have here epubs that set the color of the
> > text to black ( e.g http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=51488 ), so in
> > ca
> On March 10, 2013, 12:27 a.m., Azat Khuzhin wrote:
> > Seems more appropriate for me. But one more thing, is reg1 still needed?
>
> Jaydeep Solanki wrote:
> Yes, because it prevents "asdfhttp://www.google.com"; from getting
> detected.
>
> Azat Khuzhin wrote:
> I think that for this
> On March 9, 2013, 4:12 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I am not sure this is the totally correct fix (I'm not saying the code we
> > have now is better). But i do have here epubs that set the color of the
> > text to black ( e.g http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=51488 ), so in
> > ca
> On March 9, 2013, 4:12 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I am not sure this is the totally correct fix (I'm not saying the code we
> > have now is better). But i do have here epubs that set the color of the
> > text to black ( e.g http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=51488 ), so in
> > ca
> On March 9, 2013, 4:12 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I am not sure this is the totally correct fix (I'm not saying the code we
> > have now is better). But i do have here epubs that set the color of the
> > text to black ( e.g http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=51488 ), so in
> > ca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186531
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186531
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||junior-jobs
Summary|Trim Margin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188239
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||junior-jobs
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316496
--- Comment #9 from Valter Mura ---
Yes, I agree with you. Perhaps it is way the cups/hplip driver communicates
with the printer.
The strange thing is that, for example, if I print an odt file (LibreOffice), I
get the correct printout.
--
You are rece
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316549
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205496
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WAITINGFORIN
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205496
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|0.9 |0.16.0
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205496
--- Comment #15 from Albert Astals Cid ---
Nah, can't still reproduce :-/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://
> On March 9, 2013, 4:12 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I am not sure this is the totally correct fix (I'm not saying the code we
> > have now is better). But i do have here epubs that set the color of the
> > text to black ( e.g http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=51488 ), so in
> > ca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=252462
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version Fixed In|
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109096/#review29033
---
This review has been submitted with commit
5ab30aae15ac69e0306
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109096/
---
(Updated March 11, 2013, 9:53 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107442/
---
(Updated March 12, 2013, 1:24 a.m.)
Review request for Okular.
Changes
-
> On March 7, 2013, 3:59 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Tried it looks pretty cool :) Some minor comments inline
> >
> > You will need to rebase your patch, there's a small conflict with a change
> > i did in document.cp
Thanks a lot for your feedback!
These issues will be addressed in ve
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107442/
---
(Updated March 12, 2013, 1:26 a.m.)
Review request for Okular.
Changes
-
32 matches
Mail list logo