El Divendres, 19 d'octubre de 2012, a les 19:55:45, Bogdan Cristea va
escriure:
> On Friday 19 October 2012 17:46:01 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > One would say that on desktop you want okular to have a higher initial
> > preference and the reverse on touch systems, but how do we do that? with a
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200183
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308683
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
Severity|normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308683
--- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid ---
"Set display options"
what are "display options"?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-dev
On Sunday 21 October 2012 22:44:59 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> That doesn't really help with the problem since you can't embed C++ code in
> a .desktop file
No, but you could use this in a cmake lists file instead of a cmake switch as
you said previously.
--
Bogdan
_
El Diumenge, 21 d'octubre de 2012, a les 22:48:47, Bogdan Cristea va escriure:
> On Sunday 21 October 2012 22:44:59 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > That doesn't really help with the problem since you can't embed C++ code
> > in
> > a .desktop file
>
> No, but you could use this in a cmake lists file
On Sunday 21 October 2012 23:35:52 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> I don't think it makes mush sense either, it'd mean distributions would
> have to build the binary for the touch code in a touch enabled server?
I mean that okular active must rely on an API in order to use the touch
screen, so one co
El Diumenge, 21 d'octubre de 2012, a les 23:58:54, Bogdan Cristea va escriure:
> On Sunday 21 October 2012 23:35:52 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I don't think it makes mush sense either, it'd mean distributions would
> > have to build the binary for the touch code in a touch enabled server?
>
> I
El Dissabte, 20 d'octubre de 2012, a les 18:36:40, Jon Mease va escriure:
> Greetings,
Hi
> So I've spent a good bit of time studying the code, planning, and
> prototyping ideas for the undo framework and I wanted to lay them out
> here for general discussion.
>
> Location of the QUndoStack: My
On Monday 22 October 2012 00:21:33 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> The "active" (touch) code needs to be able to be compiled in a server (as
> distributions do). So you can't do any assumption on the host
> environment/hardware doing the compiation versus the target
> environment/hardware.
Well, I g
10 matches
Mail list logo
