https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490787
--- Comment #6 from GianPiero Puccioni ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #5)
> Sorry i meant ghostscript.
>
Ok.
> And yes, sadly we use a different way to render eps standalone than eps
> inside dvi. We could change it, but it would be an
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490787
--- Comment #5 from Albert Astals Cid ---
Sorry i meant ghostscript.
And yes, sadly we use a different way to render eps standalone than eps inside
dvi. We could change it, but it would be an super enormous amount of work for
what is almost a dying doc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490787
GianPiero Puccioni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|UPSTREAM|WAITINGFORINFO
--- Comment #4 from GianPie
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490787
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |UPSTREAM
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490787
--- Comment #2 from GianPiero Puccioni ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #1)
> Your eps file seems wrong, just doing
>
> gs test.eps
>
> fails
>
> replacing
>
> %%BoundingBox: (atend)
>
> by
>
> %%BoundingBox: 16 18 727 536
>
> in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490787
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
CC|
