Alle giovedì 11 settembre 2008, Markus Grabner ha scritto:
> The current implementation has the same problem (unless the size of the
> file is the same after a modification), but anyway I understood the
> annotation concept in okular to be designed for static files. Keeping track
> of modifications
Alle giovedì 18 settembre 2008, Albert Astals Cid ha scritto:
> > Reading the whole document by chunks or once at a single shot is
> > basically the same.
>
> Not really, reading the document as a whole gives you a QByteArray of the
> full size of the file, if you read 1MB at a time, you have much
A Dijous 18 Setembre 2008, Pino Toscano va escriure:
> Alle giovedì 11 settembre 2008, Markus Grabner ha scritto:
> > Loading the file from a local hard disk takes considerably longer,
>
> You are assuming whatever will load a document, will load it at once, while
> there are file formats that can
Alle giovedì 11 settembre 2008, Markus Grabner ha scritto:
> Loading the file from a local hard disk takes considerably longer,
You are assuming whatever will load a document, will load it at once, while
there are file formats that can be read by chunk (eg TIFF, PostScript).
> so I'm
> not very
Am Donnerstag, 11. September 2008 schrieb Brad Hards:
> On Thursday 11 September 2008 08:16:05 am Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Dijous 11 Setembre 2008, Markus Grabner va escriure:
> > > I like Ivo's proposal to use QCryptographicHash, which supports MD4,
> > > MD5, and Sha1, so these are natural
On Thursday 11 September 2008 08:16:05 am Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Dijous 11 Setembre 2008, Markus Grabner va escriure:
> > I like Ivo's proposal to use QCryptographicHash, which supports MD4, MD5,
> > and Sha1, so these are natural candidates.
>
> It's not an attacker, it's you having two file
Am Donnerstag, 11. September 2008 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> A Dijous 11 Setembre 2008, Markus Grabner va escriure:
> > I don't see any serious security threat by using a weak hash function at
> > this point. All an attacker could do would be to create a modified file
> > for which the same annot
A Dijous 11 Setembre 2008, Markus Grabner va escriure:
> Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2008 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> > A Dimecres 10 Setembre 2008, Markus Grabner va escriure:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > It has been discussed (http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614)
> > > to use a hash functio
Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2008 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> A Dimecres 10 Setembre 2008, Markus Grabner va escriure:
> > Hi!
> >
> > It has been discussed (http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614) to
> > use a hash function to determine the name of the annotation file created
> > by oku
A Dimecres 10 Setembre 2008, Markus Grabner va escriure:
> Hi!
>
> It has been discussed (http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614) to
> use a hash function to determine the name of the annotation file created by
> okular. The attached patch implements this behaviour (thanks Ivo for
> p
Hi!
It has been discussed (http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614) to use
a hash function to determine the name of the annotation file created by
okular. The attached patch implements this behaviour (thanks Ivo for pointing
me to QCryptographicHash - I looked for such a thing b
11 matches
Mail list logo
