> On Sept. 8, 2012, 1:49 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > David are you there?
No answer in a month, closing, please create a new one if you have time again
- Albert
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103942/#review18688
---
David are you there?
- Albert Astals Cid
On Feb. 12, 2012, 4
> On Feb. 12, 2012, 9:58 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Seems like lots of code of the unar.cpp is "copied" from unrar.cpp could
> > you just generalize/share it? Having "duplicate" code is not good.
>
> David Palacio wrote:
> Right, my fault. My original intention is to remove the Rar
> On Feb. 12, 2012, 9:58 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Seems like lots of code of the unar.cpp is "copied" from unrar.cpp could
> > you just generalize/share it? Having "duplicate" code is not good.
Right, my fault. My original intention is to remove the Rar classes and use
only the Unarc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103942/#review10567
---
Seems like lots of code of the unar.cpp is "copied" from unrar.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103942/
---
(Updated Feb. 12, 2012, 4:09 p.m.)
Review request for Okular.
Changes
--