https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
michael changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|reeves...@gmail.com |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@archlinux.us
--- Comment #41 from Albe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|general |general
Version|4.9
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|general |general
Version|0.5.81
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
--- Comment #29 from michael ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> (In reply to comment #27)
> > if you never call addClient(), then I'm
> > missing a piece of the puzzle (who adds the client?).
>
> I have no clue, something in kdelibs?
That would seem to b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
--- Comment #28 from Albert A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
--- Comment #27 from David Faure ---
Qt GUI code runs in a single thread, there can't be race conditions.
This is about removeClient() not being called, after addClient(). However I
don't understand comment #14, if you never call addClient(), then I'm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Henry Pfeil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hpf...@psnarf.org
--- Comment #26 from Henry Pfei
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Graeme Hewson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@wormhole.me.uk
--- Comment #25 from Graeme
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Marco Poletti changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||poletti.ma...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Edub Kendo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||esw9...@gmail.com
--- Comment #24 from Edub Kendo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
--- Comment #23 from Jekyll Wu ---
*** Bug 295005 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
Okula
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
mar...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@gmail.com
--- Comment #22 from mar...@
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Pino Toscano changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toralf.foers...@gmx.de
--- Comment #21 from Pino
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Mara Raram changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marara...@gmx.net
--
Configure bugmail: https
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Jonathan Ryshpan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonr...@pacbell.net
--- Comment #20 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
--
Configure bugmail: ht
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||corda...@gmail.com
--- Comment #19 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
--- Comment #18 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
--- Comment #17 from michael 2011-10-09 03:35:50 ---
The kate issue is fixed now in the KDE ppa. Don't know if its been pushed out
on any other stable releases yet. kate had mutiple bugs with its own code where
it called addClient but did not call
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcbev...@gmail.com
--- Comment #16 from David 201
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
michael changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||reeves...@gmail.com
--- Comment #15 from michael
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
--- Comment #14 from Albert Astals Cid 2011-06-16 21:06:33
---
David, can you confirm that i should be calling factory()->removeClient( m_part
); even if i never called addClient()?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=em
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
bk...@gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|bk...@gnu.org |
--- Comment #13 from2011-06-16 20:40:06
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Davor Cubranic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cubra...@acm.org
--- Comment #12 from Davo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Christoph Feck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bk...@gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Christo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
michael changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|reeves...@gmail.com |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/user
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
--- Comment #10 from michael 2011-04-16 22:40:09 ---
Since this apparently cann't be handled by the library the patch mettioned here
would seem to be the only opition.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
--- Comment #9 from David Faure 2011-04-15 12:22:54 ---
I wrote "this will leak" for a good reason. It does leak, forgetClient() can
only do some basic cleanup (forgetting this client, like the name says) but not
delete associated containers, that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
--- Comment #8 from michael 2011-04-12 04:27:29 ---
See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266538 as well. This bug is similar to
that one a might be a duplicate.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You ar
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Martin von Gagern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.vgag...@gmx.net
--- Comment #7 f
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
--- Comment #6 from michael 2011-04-04 04:11:27 ---
Excerpt from kxmlguiclient.cpp at the source of the warning:
if ( d->m_factory ) {
kWarning(240) << this << "deleted without having been removed from the
factory first. This will leak stan
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
--- Comment #5 from michael 2011-04-04 02:26:01 ---
Ignore the last part of that comment.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
--- Comment #4 from michael 2011-04-04 02:13:51 ---
This should be handled by whatever code is doing the adding not okular. It fact
this should be done at the time the warning is given even if a warning message
must still be displayed. This is how
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
michael changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||reeves...@gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: https:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Ahmad Samir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com
--
Configure bugmai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Frank Thieme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fr...@fthieme.net
--- Comment #3 from Frank
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fa...@kde.org
--- Comment #2 from Alber
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261538
Kevin Range changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kra...@lhup.edu
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Ran
39 matches
Mail list logo
