This is kind of odd: there is what appears to be an official KDE site on the
printing subsystem, called printing.kde.org, that is actually all about
kdeprint. It talks about it as a great new improvement in printing for KDE,
and so on and so on, and then at the bottom of the page one realizes it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271869
--- Comment #2 from Davor Cubranic 2011-05-08 07:16:00 ---
I opened the file and scrolled through it -- no lockups here. But there could
be some memory issues if you're RAM is tight, though. As I was reading the file
you sent, I had 'top' running:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #92 from Davor Cubranic 2011-05-08 06:26:26 ---
Falk, to clarify: do you mean that the orientation detection code works
differently than what is already in Okular? You didn't just cut-and-paste,
because the types that they work on are d
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172858
Ilia K. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mail4i...@gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: https:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271755
--- Comment #7 from Davor Cubranic 2011-05-08 03:02:35 ---
Thanks for the clarification, Evert. This can be marked a duplicated of bug
187237.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #155 from Harald Nikolisin 2011-05-08
02:23:40 ---
(In reply to comment #154)
> There is a GSOC project for implementing editing/saving of pdf annotations in
> okular properly (i.e. via the poppler backend, see
> http://socghop.appspot
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #91 from Falk 2011-05-07 23:31:24 ---
@Kevin
It was my first Idea was to reuse the ocular orientation detection code. But I
didn't found a way to pass the information from there to the actual printer
code without breaking the complete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #90 from Kevin Kofler 2011-05-07 22:31:37
---
So for starters, I think it's a bad idea to boycott this bug. Many users are
being annoyed by it and only a small vocal bunch of them complained on this
bug. That said, I understand your fe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #89 from Albert Astals Cid 2011-05-07 19:36:10
---
@Falk: Sorry, as I already stated I don't feel like working on this bug, i was
just giving some quick advice
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #88 from Falk 2011-05-07 19:16:10 ---
@Albert
As I already stated, the patch fixes *only* PDFs all other formats maybe still
encounter the problem. But they should be easily patchable too because we now
know whats wrong.
If you can po
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #87 from Mindaugas 2011-05-07 19:01:02 ---
As I am just user, I try to contribute as I can. I googled and found, that a
few years ago Evince, Acrobat reader, kpdf had similar problem. And the
solution was the same, as said in comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271869
--- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid 2011-05-07 18:34:01
---
Is it possible that you just have too few memory and your system is running out
of RAM?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #86 from Albert Astals Cid 2011-05-07 18:27:40
---
@Kevin: If you think the patch is correct and are prepared to take the blame i
don't see why you should not commit it
@Falk: And you have checked all the other formats we support? Als
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #85 from Falk 2011-05-07 17:41:53 ---
I just checked it.
With the patch also mixed documents now print as one would expect.
Falk
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #84 from Kevin Kofler 2011-05-07 17:24:31
---
That's certainly an improvement over the status quo and I think it should be
applied.
However, I suspect there might still be issues with mixed portrait/landscape
documents.
--
Configure
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #83 from Falk 2011-05-07 17:19:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=59734)
--> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=59734)
Patch for the PDF orientation problem
First of all I am not a Okular/KDE developer ... just a normal user that lo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263445
--- Comment #7 from Pieter De Decker 2011-05-07 16:03:18
---
Honestly, I have no idea. Every day there's a handful of package updates that I
have to approve, so most of the time I don't even look at the updates list. I
can tell you however that I'
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #82 from Karl Sinn 2011-05-07 15:40:31 ---
Hi,
Please don't misunderstand I'm not trying to "attack" anybody body here or to
"destroy" the benefit of anybody's work here. I'm simply frustrated of having
great software here which I can'
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #81 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2011-05-07
13:15:11 ---
Fair enough. However, I stand by what I said then: I think this does harm KDE's
reputation.
Anyway, I understand you so I'll leave it here. I hope working on Okular gets
fun a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #80 from Albert Astals Cid 2011-05-07 13:05:37
---
@Geert: Yes, leave it lay low, don't give us anymore bad comments and we might
come back in the future, or you might be lucky and get some new developer to
fix it.
@Alvaro: Yes it is,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #79 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2011-05-07
12:40:52 ---
No, please... It's bug 157284 all over again.
Out of curiosity, is there any other reason not to fix this bug apart from
"punishing bad users" (and thus all KDE users indirect
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #78 from Geert Janssens 2011-05-07 12:39:13 ---
Thank you for your feedback. Given the history of comments on this bug I can
really understand the developer's attitude here, but at the same time I would
find it unfortunate if this bug i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263445
--- Comment #6 from Albert Astals Cid 2011-05-07 12:35:00
---
You changed your X or X drivers version?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee f
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270602
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268816
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #77 from Albert Astals Cid 2011-05-07 12:19:09
---
#76: We developers got fed up of the abuse happened in this and other various
bugs and moved to greener pastures
By the way if you don't use Okular anymore personally I would be grate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #76 from Karl Sinn 2011-05-07 11:51:50 ---
(In reply to comment #75)
> Does this bug is in plans to fix for KDE 4.7? How can we force developers to
> solve it?
I gave up on this one. Nobody will ever fix it. btw I don't use okular any
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Mindaugas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||em...@super.lt
--- Comment #75 from Mindaugas
28 matches
Mail list logo
