[Okular-devel] [Bug 163117] problem with printing in Okular

2008-09-11 Thread Paul van Erk
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163117 --- Comment #15 from Paul van Erk 2008-09-11 11:12:54 --- Hadn't found it, thanks. Hopefully openSUSE Factory will start using Qt-4.4.1 soon. :/ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Okular-devel] [Bug 163117] problem with printing in Okular

2008-09-11 Thread Pino Toscano
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163117 --- Comment #14 from Pino Toscano 2008-09-11 10:13:21 --- @Paul van Erk (comment #13 and #14): your problem is not this one, but bug #162793. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail be

[Okular-devel] [Bug 163117] problem with printing in Okular

2008-09-11 Thread Paul van Erk
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163117 --- Comment #13 from Paul van Erk 2008-09-11 08:53:31 --- Oops, too big file. Here we go: http://www.parena.net/temp/bugs.kde.org-163117-printingdialog.avi Excuse the Nvidia beta driver choppyness. This is KDE 4.1.1 (openSUSE Factory), but this ha

[Okular-devel] [Bug 163117] problem with printing in Okular

2008-09-11 Thread Paul van Erk
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163117 Paul van Erk parena parena net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Commen

Re: [Okular-devel] md5 hash for annotation file name

2008-09-11 Thread Markus Grabner
Am Donnerstag, 11. September 2008 schrieb Brad Hards: > On Thursday 11 September 2008 08:16:05 am Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > A Dijous 11 Setembre 2008, Markus Grabner va escriure: > > > I like Ivo's proposal to use QCryptographicHash, which supports MD4, > > > MD5, and Sha1, so these are natural

Re: [Okular-devel] md5 hash for annotation file name

2008-09-11 Thread Brad Hards
On Thursday 11 September 2008 08:16:05 am Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Dijous 11 Setembre 2008, Markus Grabner va escriure: > > I like Ivo's proposal to use QCryptographicHash, which supports MD4, MD5, > > and Sha1, so these are natural candidates. > > It's not an attacker, it's you having two file