I don't know of an internal tool (wudele is only for simpler
single-queation votes), but can set up a poll today. Something like:
Q1: How should WOW vote on the movement charter?
- Yes
- No
- No vote
Q2: What comments should we leave? (We will combine + summarize as many
points from members as we
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024, 5:42 PM Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
> The main change for the UG would perhaps be that it could become a tier
> 2 or even tier 3 affiliate:
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Supplementary_Document/Future_Affiliate_Landscape
Yes, and a certain increased ab
I agree broadly with your take SJ, we should make a short comment as to what
could be more palatable, but this being said, how do we formally set the UG’s
position one way or the other? Is there some internal voting tool we could use?
> On 2 Jul 2024, at 22:16, Samuel Klein wrote:
>
> Thanks b
You managed to sell the Charter so well Sj ;)
On another note... to comment on Stephane's below... I also feel that
the only real pressuring need that led to the work on this charter is
decision over funding - about collecting the money (eg; having the right
to fundraise), about spending the m
I have no opinion on whether the UG should vote yes or no, because it's
not clear which vote is more likely to produce changes. A resounding no
either from the community or from affiliates may just lead WMF to cancel
the entire thing. The WMF BoT's current proposals are based on the
premise tha
Thanks both for these thoughts! I also don't want to "just" say yes or
no, but those are the options.
We can leave a detailed comment about what we actually want to see. Maybe
we draft that collaboratively?
Stephane writes:
> TL;DR: too complicated; structurally unable to address any type of
ch
Ok, I’ll bite (I’m in a bit of a rush so apologies in advance if the tone seems
curt. Not the intent, but emails often come out as such)
My first concern is that I still don’t know what the exact problem is that this
charter is trying to solve. If it is to restore some balance between
Chapters/
Nevertheless want to insist on the fact I am not sold.
So if others feel unconfortable, prefer for us to abstain or vote
against... I am totally fine with that.
Said differently... count me rather in the "undecided - depends on the
hour of the day"
Flo
Le 02/07/2024 à 00:47, Florence Devoua
I am going to try to put things into perspective.
I do like any of the two options.
I am not fan of the proposition. For all the reasons already mentionned.
I also think that if it were adopted, it would take several years before
getting implemented, and it would certainly be amended. I see a l
Well, the two WMF Board liaisons to the committee have suggested that the
Board not ratify it. WMDE and Wikimedia CEE have said they would vote for
it. Others (like JMabel's thoughts I posted in the other thread) have also
shared their takes.
In general many concerns raised on this list a month a
10 matches
Mail list logo
