do correct me if I am wrong. Anyone?
Regards,
Luis Freitas
Arkadiy Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello ocfs2-users,
I have 2 questions:
1. I forgot the block size and cluster size that I chose
during formatting of the drive. Is there any way I can find it out
afterwards?
Hi,
It seems that you inverted the times on the chart.
Regards,
Luis
GOKHAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everbody this is my first post,
I have two test server .(Both of them is idle)
db1 : RHEL4 OCFS2
db2 : RHEL3 OCFS
I test the IO both of them
The res
ue, 16 Jan 2007 03:17:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Luis Freitas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] ocfs Vs ocfs2
To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
It seems that you inverted the times
Joel,
It is not using o_direct only if the coreutils package was not installed
on the RH3.0 machine. (coreutils-4.5.3-41.i386.rpm ).
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/coreutils/files/
If it is installed, then both tests are using O_DIRECT, and can be
compared.
I do n
Antonio,
Last time I looked, about 6 months ago, LVM2 still wasnt cluster aware. So
changing volume sizes on a cluster disk could lead to data corruption. At least
a reboot of all involved nodes would be required after any LVM change, or some
other procedure to force LVM to reread the v
Brandon,
Can you post details about the Disk layout you are using and disk models?
(RAID5/RAID10, 15K RPM or 10K RPM, 36Gb or 76Gb, how many disks on each raid
group)
Best Regards,
Luis
Brandon Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well today I did clean installs on 3 test machines.
Alexei,
Actually your log seems to show that CSSD (Oracle CRS) rebooted the node
before OCFS2 got a chance to do it.
On a RAC cluster, if the interconnect is interrupted, all the nodes hang
until a split brain resolution is complete and the recovery of all the crashed
nodes i
tter of few month, when it broke in production.
- Original Message -
From:LuisFreitas
To: Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 4:52PM
Subject: Re: Hmm,here is an example. Re:[Ocfs2-users] Also just a
comment to theOracle guys
Alexe
Hi,
This is a bit off topic, hope there is not a problem.
Anyone out there experiencing high swapping with the kernel retaining a
large amount of buffers? This used to be a problem on 2.4, and I usually
changed /proc/sys/vm/freepages to fix it. But on 2.6 this parameter no longe
;
> John
>
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 15:31 -0800, Luis Freitas wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a bit off topic, hope there is not a problem.
>>
>> Anyone out there experiencing high swapping with the kernel
>> retaining a large amount of buffers? This
Andy,
I found helpfull to diagnose this kind of hang to keep a priority 0 shell
opened on the server. This shell usually keeps working even during heavy
swapping or other situations where the system becomes unresponsive. You can
start one with this command:
nice -n -20 bash
(/proc/sys/vm/swappiness)
-
Original Message -
From: Brian Sieler
To: 'Luis Freitas' ; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 10:52 PM
Subject: RE: [Ocfs2-users] High on buffers and deep on swap
Luis, yes I am experiencing what appe
rs in the system.
- Original Message -----
From: Luis Freitas
To: Alexei_Roudnev ; Brian Sieler ; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] High on buffers and deep on swap
Alexei,
Yes, it seems to have no effect, w
stack independently and concurrently
with CRS is not even allowed on other platforms.
This is kind of funny because both o2cb and crs are Oracle products.
Regards,
Luis Freitas
Sunil Mushran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fencing is not a fs operation but a cluster operation.
ory without any delay (because these are buffers which are
already written to the disk or which was never udpated).
Big 'cached' value means only _big free memory_.
- O riginal Message -
From: Luis Freitas
To: Alexei_Roudnev ; Brian Sieler ; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.co
Ulf,
I have implemented a few RAC databases and worked with OCFS, OCFS2,
NetApp and ASM on different machines.
In my opinion, currently, OCFS2 seems to be rather stable for Oracle use,
except for some race conditions with CRS when the CRS files are on OCFS2 and
the small defau
Gaetano,
If o2cb or CRS is killing the machine, it usually shows on
/var/log/messages with lines explaining what happened. Take a look on the
/var/log/messages just before the last "syslogd x.x.x: restart".
Regards,
Luis
Gaetano Giunta wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On a 2 node RAC 10
m,
which is 40 km away from my ususal workplace), and diagnosed the ocfs2
heartbeat as "the killer".
Bye
Gaetano
-Original Message-
From: Luis Freitas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 11:17 PM
To: Gaetano Giunta
Cc: Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Sub
way from my ususal workplace), and diagnosed the
ocfs2 heartbeat as "the killer".
Bye
Gaetano
-Original Message-
From: Luis Freitas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se
Randy,
If you have one big volume with several partitions you will have to stop
all servers if you want to create new partitions or delete one, or be
extremelly careful. With LVM2 and CLVM you could work with one big disk without
this kind of trouble.
Personally I prefer having multi
rn code = 0x2
Anyone knows how to prevent the kernel from trying to access this lun?
Regards,
Luis Freitas
Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
System: Two brand new Dell 1950 servers with dual Intel Quadcore Xeon connected
to an EMC CX3-20 SAN. Running CentOS 5 x
Yohan
The device you are using for OCFS2 need to be shared between nodes, either
a shared device on a external storage or a mirrored device using DRDB or iSCSI.
For Oracle database use on a certified configuration you need to use a external
storage, as drdb is not a officially supported
Harry,
This tool fails here too if I put these "-c" and "-q" parameters for the
storage checks. Even so RAC is installed and running. I would not pay much
attention to this at this point.
Also as far as I know these parameters are originaly intended to work
with raw devices.
second node empty
-Original Message-
From: Harry Ronis
Sent: Aug 21, 2007 1:03 PM
To: Luis Freitas , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] cluvfy fails in pre crs install
running install --asking to run root.sh from hackman only
Didn'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# ./vipca
Exception in thread "main" [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]#
I believe this is the LAST HUMP in clusterware
-Original Message-
From: Luis Freitas
Sent: Aug 21, 2007 3:35 PM
To: Harry Ronis , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ocfs2-users@os
Prabhakar,
This post is only my personal opinion. I do not work for Oracle nor have
any close contact with the support and development groups. But I never heard of
anyone using this combination.
This is kind of a gray area, since Oracle usually provides support for
OCFS2 in
ter what is _officially certified_.
- Original Message -
From: Luis Freitas
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Urgent :: 11i on OCFS2.. I mean
APPL_TOP,COMMON_TOP etc..
I cant read Russian... Does it work???
Regards,
Luis
Alexei_Roudnev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is discussion about it on www.sql.ru, but it is in Russian.
- Original Message -
From: "Santosh Udupa"
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:04 PM
Subject: [Ocfs2-users]
Anyone got this working on emc powerpath?
I remeber seeing somewhere some special configuration to get mounting by
label working with multipath devices, but could not find it again.
Regards,
Luis
Ricardo Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi people,
Thanks a lot for your a
If I am not mistaken, Veritas Storage Foundation can do. It can also do
online resize. But I am not a Veritas expert, feel free to correct me.
>From a whitepaper:
FlashSnap, a feature of Veritas Storage
Foundation Cluster File System, can create point-in-time
copies of production informatio
In OCFSv1 this could only be done with the oracle patched binutils, but it
should be safe to backup OCFSv2 files directly.
Any input from the developers?
Regards,
Luis
Shivaprasad Kambalimath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We use EMC's BCV for OCFS2 split mirror and it works just fine (10
Is there any cluster NFS solution out there? (Two NFS servers sharing the same
filesystem with distributed locking and failover capability)
Regards,
Luis
Sunil Mushran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Appears what you are looking for is a
mix of ocfs2 and nfs.
The storage servers mount the shared di
have the NFS cluster presenting a
>> single IP, and failing over / load balancing some other way.
>>
>> I'm looking at NFS v4 as one potential avenue (no single IP, but it does
>> let you fail over from 1 server to the next in line), and commercial
>> p
;> single IP, and failing over / load balancing some other way.
> >>
> >> I'm looking at NFS v4 as one potential avenue (no single IP, but it does
> >> let you fail over from 1 server to the next in line), and commercial
> >> products such as
Well, I stand corrected, and do think he has a point. OCFS2 is heavilly
tested on Oracle RAC related scenarios, large files, high I/O rates, etc. On
other scenarios, dealing with ACLs, and multiple user ids, it might not be so
throrougly tested. But I do see a large effort to resolve any i
For test and research you could look into DRDB, which should be rather
stable.
If you are adventurous, you could try running RAID1 over two iSCSI targets,
or use ATA over ethernet. I am pretty sure that the linux md tools are not
cluster aware. Dont know if LVM2 has mirroring.
I
can experiment with whatever you
suggest and won't held you responsible for that.
Thanks.
Anjan
Luis Freitas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anjan,
Are you installing the binaries on OCSF2 too? How are you mounting the
filesystem?
You might want to try using ext3 for
a non-shared oracle home.
It's just not a good shared disk diagnostic tool ;)
Once again, thanks for stepping up and lending a hand.
--Mark
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:50:28AM -0800, Luis Freitas wrote:
> Anjan,
>
> You dont need to share the database binaries, only the CRS and the
using?
Regards,
Luis
Anjan Chakraborty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luis Freitas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Luis,
As far as I know, it's not recommended to mount ORACLE_HOME with
datavolume,nointr but that's not the case with CRS. So, I have different mount
options for ORA
But place OCR, Voting Disks & future datafiles with datavolume,nointr
Did I understand correctly?
I have also gone back to OCFS2 1.2.5-6.
Okay, if this is the suggestion -- I will surely try.
Thanks.
Anjan
Luis Freitas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anjan,
The tw
If you have lots of small files, it could happen. The basic space allocation
unit is one block. If I am not mistaken on OCFS2 the default is 4k.
A quick search on google shows that Reiserfs can coalesce small files
together and save space.
You could try to format your OCFS partition wit
Michael,
You might be able to route IP over your FC network. I know that some unixes
do this, but I am not sure on how to do it on Linux.
Regards,
Luis
Mark Fasheh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:47:37AM
-0800, Michael M. wrote:
> As we have fiber channel, and we have
I had no idea that such a tool existed on Linux. Do anyone know of a
graphical/web frontend for systemtap?
Regards,
Luis
Ulf Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I will look at it. In the meanwhile I
did find at least one of the
standby processes reading in bursts every 60-70 seconds like 400
Laurent,
I never used DRDB (We have a SAN here...), or heartbeat either, but I suspect
you will need to configure the OCFS2 timeouts to be larger than the heartbeat2
timeouts so that DRDB can resolve itself before the OCFS2 causes the machine to
fence.
Also you probably will want to config
Laurent,
What you need to be able to decide is what node still have network
connectivity. If both have network connectivity you could fence any of them. If
both lost connectivity (someone turned the switch off), then you are in trouble.
You will need to plug the backend network in a swit
ith my issue...
Luis Freitas wrote: Laurent,
What you need to be able to decide is what node still have network
connectivity. If both have network connectivity you could fence any of them. If
both lost connectivity (someone turned the switch off), then you are in trouble.
You wil
Sunil,
Can I configure this heartbeat to use a high priority (realtime)
schedulling?
If I simply increase the timeout it still could timeout on heavy I/O
situations, like several different threads queuing large amounts of writes. The
kernel should know this is a high priority write so
If you expect one of the switches to remain alive you should configure your bonding driver timeout low to force it to failover soon to the other switch. What kind of bonding are you using? There are several different modes on Linux, for different types of switch configurations. I have used balan
Werner, Some people reported weird behaviour with SELinux enabled. You could check if it is disabled on the kernel:$ /usr/sbin/sestatusSELinux status: disabledRegards,Luis--- On Thu, 4/24/08, Sunil Mushran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:From: Sunil Mushran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: [Ocfs
Alexandra,
You could use only CRS and ext3 instead of ocfs2 for this kind of
use. You would need to register a script to force umount the filesystem on the
primary node and mount it on the node you are failing over to, it would be nice
to be able to check if the filesystem is mounted before
oss.oracle.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008, 5:07 PM
AFAIK:
a. There is no force umount in Linux.
b. There is no way to know whether a local fs is mounted on another node.
Luis Freitas wrote:
> Alexandra,
>
>You could use only CRS and ext3 instead of ocfs2 for this
sday, May 27, 2008, 7:46 PM
Lazy umount is not the same as forced umount. The processes
that have active descriptors will keep reading and writing to
the fs. The processes are not killed.
Luis Freitas wrote:
> Hmm,
>
> There is a "lazy" umount:
>
>
>-l Lazy
Alexandre,
What are you running on the servers? (NFS Server? apache? Oracle?)
Regards,
Luis
--- On Mon, 6/2/08, Alexandre Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Alexandre Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] huge "something" problem
To: "Sunil Mushran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc
Alexandra, I usually make sure that one of the timeouts is large enought so that the other node death is detected before the other node "self-fence". To solve the problem you could configure the OCFS timeouts to be
larger than the CRS timeouts, so that the CRS fences the node and OCFS detects
iker
Kirchstr. 6 - 51647 Gummersbach
Telefon: +49 2261 6001-0
Mobil: +49 173 2808193
http://www.opitz-consulting.de
Geschäftsführer: Bernhard Opitz, Dr. Jürgen Abel, Ulrich Kramer
HRB-Nr. 39163 Amtsgericht Köln
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag von Luis Freitas [EMAIL PROTECTE
Abhishek, Depends on what you intend to use OCFS2 for. Since you want to test Oracle RAC, the best options would be to go with a iSCSI setup or use a firewire shared disk, to get a configuration close to what is supported by Oracle . For both options you will need a third computer to "simulat
Tina,
I believe Sunil already answered this before but...
Since there is no datavolume option on the version you are using the
application needs to use "directio" to guarantee the changes are flushed
immediatelly to disk.
You force this for the database using some parameters
(file
Sunil,
This applies only to subdirectories or also to the number of files inside a
directory?
Oracle Applications can easily have hundreds of thousands files inside the
concurrent output and log directories.
Regards,
Luis
--- On Thu, 7/3/08, Sunil Mushran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From:
Jamin,
If you are using 10g you can create two 170Mb partitions for the OCR and
three 20Mb partitions for the voting disk, and you can leave the rest on a
single partition for the OCFS2 filesystem.
I never installed 11g RAC, but the manual says that each partition must be
280Mb or larger
Funny, I could not find a option to specify the number of inodes or the
inodes/bytes ratio on mkfs.ocfs2?
Regards,
Luis
--- On Tue, 7/22/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Ocfs2-users] Recommended block size for a mail envi
Ed,
My two cents here.
I have some 3Gb datafiles here and restore to OCFS2 using rman with no
problems. But I am using Linux 32bits and the backup is read from veritas
netbackup so it is not exactly the same environment.
Also, 1409*8192 gives about 11Mb, so you are well under 2Gb when
Tina,
The raw devices are being deprecated on Linux. Since you are using fedora
instead of a enterprise distro these changes are already done.
You can use disk devices directly with the 11g clusterware. Also it probably
would work with the main tree OCFS2, that doesnt has the datavolume
Daniel,
What do you have on db_file_multiblock_read_count on the problem database?
Regards,
Luis
--- On Thu, 8/14/08, Daniel Keisling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Daniel Keisling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Ocfs2-users] Linux-x86_64 Error: 4: Interrupted system call
To: ocfs2-users@oss
o 8.
From: Luis Freitas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 3:46 PM
To:
ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com; Daniel Keisling
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users]
Linux-x86_64 Error: 4: Interrupted system call
Daniel,
What do you have on
db_file_multiblock_read_
Silviu,
When I had this kind of issues it usually was caused by a bad hba, or a
power failure. I am assuming it is not the latter as you would be aware of it.
It is a difficult situation, since the controller only malfunctions
sporadically it is difficult to prove that it is the cause or
Silviu,
Just so you be warned, the "ANALYZE TABLE..." command locks the tables
during its execution.
Regards,
Luis
--- On Mon, 9/22/08, Luis Freitas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Luis Freitas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Lost write
Dante,
Your old debian is running OCFS 1.4 and your new Centos is running OCFS 1.2,
right?
If you are running Centos 5.0 you should be able to install OCFS 1.4.
If not you will need to umount your debian before mounting the Centos.
Beware that there are functionalities on OCFS 1.4 th
Lorenzo,
My 2 cents. This is purely speculation, since I never worked with a
environment like what you have there.
You have a very different configuration from what is usual with OCFS2. The
filesystem is tested on systems that have a fast network connection between
nodes, so it is probab
Depending on your configuration, dataguard will transfer the modifications
on the online log directly to the standby, so that the archived logs are
recreated there. It doesnt transfer the archivedlogs from disk, instead it
transfers the redo log entries directly to the other host, as they ar
Hi list,
I need to implement a High available NFS server. Since we already have OCFS2
here for RAC, and already have a virtual IP on the RAC server that failovers
automatically to the other node, it seems a natural choice to use it too for
our NFS needs. We are using OCFS2 1.2. (Upgrade to 1
ake it to the journal, it would be a
> null op. But the
> nfs client would not know that as the server has
> failed-over.
> This is a qs for nfs.
>
> What is the stack of the nfs clients? As in, what are they
> waiting on?
>
> Luis Freitas wrote:
> > Hi list,
he
> device. Yes, it needs
> to be the same.
>
> Yes, the inode numbers are consistent. It is the block
> number
> of the inode on disk.
>
> Afraid cannot help you with failover lockd.
>
> Sunil
>
> Luis Freitas wrote:
> > Sunil,
> >
> >
If your NAS can do iSCSI you could use it to provide a shared block device.
The performance wont be as good as a SAN as the data has to go through the
kernel TCP/IP stack, it can be comparable if you have a iSCSI IP accelerator
board that simulates a hba.
Regards,
Luis
--- On Fri, 12/19/
Karim,
This is not OCFS2 related, it is more related to the disk hardware
capabilities and how it works.
That will depend on your OS, HBAs and storage, and the workload.
There is a maximum queue depth associated with each LUN, so if you use
several LUNs on the same device, you could achi
ly used the ones
> from qlogic), however they don't 'simulate'
> anything - They're just a SCSI adapter with an iSCSI
> backend.
>
> Luis Freitas wrote:
> > If your NAS can do iSCSI you could use it to provide
> a shared block device.
> >
> &g
2008, at 4:59 AM, Sean Gray
> <mailto:sg...@bluestarinc.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> Note of caution. FWIW It is not recommended to
> mount OCFS2 volumes via NFS.
> >> Sean N. Gray
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Luis Freitas wrote:
> &
a...@yahoo.com; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Filesystem Block Size w//
> DB_BLOCK_SIZE
>
> True.
>
> The only point I would like to add is that you are using a
> 2+ yr
> old version of the fs. You should upgrade to atleast SLES9
> SP4.
>
> L
Brian,
We have EMC Mirrorview here, but it doesnt allow an active-active mirror, we
mount only the primary lun on both servers, and the mirror lun needs to be
"promoted" to primary, and then mounted in case of a disaster recovery. We have
a script to do that.
Regards,
Luis
--- On Thu, 1/22
David,
You said you were keeping the apache log files on OCFS2.
Are you using the same log file (access_log and error_log) for all the
nodes? That is a single access_log that is writen by both nodes simultaneosly?
Regards,
Luis
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Sunil Mushran wrote:
From: Sunil Mu
nce.
Worked well during all my testing environment stress tests, and even
worked great in production for over a month.
At 02:56 PM 1/27/2009, Luis Freitas wrote:
>David,
>
> You said you were keeping the apache log files on OCFS2.
>
> Are you using the same log file (access_lo
Luis Freitas wrote:
>The extent size would play a role on this also, as Sunil pointed. You
could check if the extent size is different on your test environment. The mkfs
tool might have defaulted a larger extent size if the total size of the
filesystem is larger. (Sunil, correct me on this if I
Karim,
I dont see why run ASM over OCFS2. It seems to be a useless overhead. Either
you run ASM or OCFS2.
Btw, neither ASM nor OCFS2 are smart enough to detect that some LUNs are
faster than others. ASM expects each diskgroup to be comprised of LUNs of
similar performance in order for it
is provide performance
and reliability with the least possible administration
Appreciate your thoughts
Best regards,
Karim
From:
ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com]
On
Behalf Of Luis Freitas
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 2
Karim,
Using ASM over OCFS2 on this scenario would not bring a improvement. You
would still have a old version on ASM, and now a complex environment that would
be very hard for a support analyst to duplicate internally at Oracle, in case
you hit issues.
If your concern is over your part
Joel,
I stand corrected.
Regards,
Luis
--- On Mon, 2/9/09, Joel Becker wrote:
From: Joel Becker
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] ASM over OCFS2 vs. Standard locally managed
tablespaces
To: "Luis Freitas"
Cc: ""
Date: Monday, February 9, 2009, 3:25 PM
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009
We use Veritas Netbackup 6.0 (With MP7) to backup some export files on a
OCFS2 filesystem, didnt have any issues so far but we didnt test it too much
either.
OCFS2 can be regarded as a regular file system, unlike OCFS1 which could not
be accessed without a special version of cp and tar.
Diane,
Are you using ASM and OCFS2? Some of the log messages point to a disk group.
Can you post a copy of your /etc/fstab with the mount options?
Regards,
Luis
--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Diane Petersen wrote:
> From: Diane Petersen
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Encountered disk I/O error 19
Robin,
To me, anyone else includes the kernel of the current node.
Well, if it is unclear the man page should be revised. Also a big warning
message on ocfs2.fsck would be nice, after all we all make mistakes. But this
is only my two cents.
Running fsck on any journaled filesystem wi
Saul,
OCFS2 1.2 doesnt has support for indexed directories. So you will need to
have a cleaning procedure for the database dump directories to keep the
quantity of log files reasonable. Unless you dont mind a "ls" hanging when you
try to find a trace. I am not sure if OCFS 1. has support fo
.
Best Regards,
Luis Freitas
--- On Fri, 8/7/09, Brett Worth wrote:
> From: Brett Worth
> Subject: [Ocfs2-users] Heartbeat Timeout Threshold
> To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Date: Friday, August 7, 2009, 9:29 PM
> I've been using OCFS2 on a 3 way
> Centos 5.2 Xen
that lost network conectivy is evicted. That is
why it is required to use a switch between the two nodes, instead of a cross
cable.
OCFS2 should do the same.
Best Regards,
Luis Freitas
--- On Mon, 11/16/09, Srinivas Eeda wrote:
> From: Srinivas Eeda
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] 2 node
cks was in control, in the same
way that happens when you use RAC with Veritas/HP ServiceGuard/Sun Cluster
Suite, or OCFS2 with heartbeat2, for example.
Best Regards,
Luis Freitas
--- On Mon, 11/16/09, Joel Becker wrote:
> From: Joel Becker
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] 2 node OCFS2 clus
Btw, someone actually using DRBD can comment better on this. I use OCFS2 for
RAC, so I have to use shared storage.
Best Regards,
Luis Freitas
--- On Tue, 12/8/09, unni krishnan wrote:
From: unni krishnan
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] ocfs2 heartbeat and drbd in dual primary
To: ocfs2-users@oss.
ones. Maybe Suse has support, I don't know, you
will have to check.
Best Regards,
Luis Freitas
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
From: Patrick J. LoPresti
Subject: [Ocfs2-users] Combining OCFS2 with Linux software RAID-0?
To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com, linux-r...@vger.kerne
OCFS2 offers integration with heartbeat2. Heartbeat2 offers a Resource Agent
'md group take over'. (which enables fail-over of host based mirroring of SAN
volumes), but OCFS2 on top of a software mirror is not supported.
...
Best Regards,
Luis Freitas
--- On Fri, 12/11/09, B
feature for Suse Linux.
Best Regards,
Luis Freitas
--- On Mon, 12/14/09, Sunil Mushran wrote:
From: Sunil Mushran
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Combining OCFS2 with Linux software RAID-0?
To: "Luis Freitas"
Cc: "Brian Kroth" , ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Date: Monday, Decemb
Thomas and James,
Usually the partition is aligned to the Cylinder boundary. In the case of a
LUN, the cylinder bondary might have no sense at all? Funny, I never tought
about this before.
There are some tools that can overwrite a few sectors on the start of the
disk
(lilo, grub, DOS fdi
Dirk,
Also, you should have noatime enabled on this filesystem, check your mount
options. Or else the rsync will end up causing access time to be updated.
Regards,
Luis
From: Eduardo Diaz - Gmail
To: Dirk Bonenkamp - ProActive
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle
Hi Jim,
Have you tried to update the kernel as suggested by Changwei?
The messages seem to indicate kernel 4.4.0, a google search shows this
ubuntu version should be able to use kernel 4.10.
Best Regards,Luis
On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 4:12 PM, Jim Okken wrote:
he
99 matches
Mail list logo
