I also support adoption.
Cheers,
Joe
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 12:29 PM Chuck Mortimore
wrote:
> I am in favor of / support adoption.
>
> thanks,
>
> Chuck Mortimore
>
>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 6, 2025 8:37 AM
>> *To:* oauth
>> *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Cal
use by older JWT libraries that don't know to validate the typ. And in
any case, it seems that not including the scope is the intention in this
draft.
Cheers,
Joe DeCock
___
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
I agree that we should align with http for the reasons mentioned elsewhere
in the thread, and also because OAuth 2.1 should only consolidate existing
specifications without introducing new behavior.
I also agree that the existing examples seem sufficient. It would be
problematic to pick which capi
