Re: [OAUTH-WG] FW: Appsdir review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-23

2012-02-14 Thread Henry S. Thompson
ion from your document shepherd >> or AD before posting a new version of the draft. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-23 >> >> Title: The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol >> >> Reviewer: Henry S. Thompson >> >> Review Date: 2012-02-

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] FW: Appsdir review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-23

2012-03-08 Thread Henry S. Thompson
ld tell me that retrieving  http://www.iana.org/oath2/access-token-types will give me a page listing all the registered access token types, and also  http://www.iana.org/oath2/access-token-types/bearer will return the registration details for the bearer type. This will then make all of (1)

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] FW: Appsdir review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-23

2012-03-08 Thread Henry S. Thompson
for your patience, I hereby get out of the road on this point. I'll reply to Eran's message wrt any other outstanding points. . . ht -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] FW: Appsdir review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-23

2012-03-08 Thread Henry S. Thompson
piana" mailing list ( > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/happiana ) and see if you can > work with Michelle and the other IANA folks on it. Indeed. I should have realised that that was the right level sooner: as I said, thanks for your patience. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, School

[OAUTH-WG] Re: [Last-Call] [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt-18 ietf last call Artart review

2025-05-02 Thread Henry S. Thompson
" %x22 %s"M" %xc3 %xb6 %s"bius" %x22 "]" > > That is about as confusing as you can get, so please don’t do that. Agreed. > (You can write this JSON text as a JSON-encoded JSON text string data item > while staying in ASCII: > "[\"26bc4LT-ac6q2K

[OAUTH-WG] Re: draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt-18 ietf last call Artart review

2025-05-02 Thread Henry S. Thompson
blem you've encountered arises when one tries to illustrate UTF-8 byte sequences in an unambiuous way in, for example, an IETF RFC. My recommendation is to follow RFC 8259's lead, and use e.g. "%xC3" for that purpose. Hope this helps, ht -- Henry S. Thompson, School of