TYVM,
Deb
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:30 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
wrote:
> Deb,
>
> Done.
>
>
> All,
>
> I have shuffled the agenda, so please take a look and let us know if you
> have any questions.
>
> Regards,
> Rifaat & Hannes
>
>
>
Thanks for the consideration,
Deb Cooley
Sec AD
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 6:33 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
wrote:
> All,
>
> The following is a draft agenda for the OAuth WG meeting in Dublin:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-121-oauth/
>
> Please, take a look and let us know
I want to add that I appreciate the authors' work to come to a resolution.
It was not easy work. I look forward to when these drafts are passed to me
(as Sec AD) for publication.
Deb Cooley
Sec AD
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 5:24 AM Brian Campbell wrote:
> Oh, and in case you missed it, t
At the risk of drawing oauth chairs ire and only because I happened to
be reading this thread w/ chagrin.
No one thinks that SD-JWT is a perfect answer to the problem. It isn't.
Sadly the perfect solution doesn't exist. So as we make our way to better
and better solutions, let us take this n
e any special provisions for only ignoring header
> parameters if they are specified as being ignored, but instead requires all
> header parameters to be ignored if they are not understood, except if they
> are critical.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 4:37 AM Deb Coole
are both my general comments, and then blow by blow responses to your
42 issues.
Deb Cooley
---
My general comments on the issues:
1. End-User comments: These are implementation choices. Holder is
basically the front for all sorts of different
the issues Deb,
>
> The document editors will take an action to incorporate the indicated
> changes in the next draft.
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 6:58 AM Deb Cooley wrote:
>
>> +oauth working group and Paul:
>>
>> Denis,
>>
>> I have gone through ev
Here are the comments on my AD review of this draft. Most of them will be
easy to fix, except for the normative references to changeable standards:
General: There are more than a couple of Normative references that are
pointing to 'living documents'. From my reading of the draft these
include:
Errata? Did I hear you say errata?
I can push the buttons to properly dispatch this. I think this includes
editing an errata and certainly includes adding notes to it. I need to
know what edits and or comments you want made, and what outcome (reject,
validate, hold for document update). Also h
