Re: [OAUTH-WG] Requesting mutliple scope, but user authorizes not all

2010-12-01 Thread David Primmer
As Eran pointed out, the way you've formatted your scope request, you've only specified one scope and I'd guess to keep things simple and consistent can either be approved or denied. I don't have a spec reference about what happens when the user doesn't approve but I assume the response is sent to

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Feedback on preliminary draft 11 from implementers of draft 10

2010-12-10 Thread David Primmer
-1 to separate parameters. I'd imagine every provider has the same issues as the ones you point out, however I don't think we should take another step toward complexity in this area. We've all managed to squeeze our resource access control semantics down into a single value and it usually requires

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Flowchart for legs of OAuth

2011-03-18 Thread David Primmer
Hi Phil, I actually think this rephrasing of the rule of thumb is not really helpful based on how the word "legs" has been used in my experience of discussing and teaching OAuth. I actually tried to be pretty explicit about this topic in a talk I did at Google I/O last year because we have lots of